CLARITY Act Moves to Senate Markup Next Week, Tim Scott Says

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

Senator Tim Scott announced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will undergo a Senate markup next week, a key step for U.S. crypto legislation. The bill aims to establish a uniform market structure for digital assets. Scott emphasized the importance of the upcoming committee vote, noting months of draft reviews and negotiations. Despite progress, the bill faces unresolved divisions within the industry. Some experts, like Gabriel Shapiro, believe a compromise is possible, while others, such as Alex Thorn, remain skeptical due to ongoing disagreements. Democrats are pushing for stricter measures, including DeFi sanctions compliance and enhanced authority for the OFAC. Regulatory uncertainty has contributed to market volatility, with significant outflows from crypto investment products recently reported. As the Senate prepares to debate the bill, stakeholders emphasize the need to balance innovation, enforcement, and investor protection, as the outcome could shape the future of crypto markets in the U.S.

A Senate markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been announced for next week, marking a critical point in the future of U.S. cryptocurrency legislation, according to Tim Scott. A new cryptocurrency bill has been proposed in order to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

“Next Thursday, we’ll have a vote on market structure,” Scott told Breitbart News on Tuesday. “It’s important for us to get on the record and vote,” Scott added that committee members have reviewed multiple drafts over the past six months, underscoring sustained negotiations ahead of the markup.

Scott’s comments align with December remarks from David Sacks, who said the landmark legislation would reach the Senate in January. The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a measure called the CLARITY Act as of July 2025. Should the Senate enact the legislation unchanged, then it would go straight to Donald Trump for final approval.

Outstanding issues keep the industry divided

Despite the progress, the bill still faces unresolved disagreements. Crypto executives and policy experts have debated its scope since it was introduced in May 2025, and opinions remain split as the Senate vote approaches.

Gabriel Shapiro, founder of MetaLeX, said the U.S. is “probably going to get a crypto market structure bill,” but cautioned that concerns around illicit finance persist. He suggested lawmakers could still reach a compromise to address those risks.

Others express more skepticism. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, said after reviewing notes from a bipartisan Senate meeting that it remains “unclear if the two sides can come together.” Thorn pointed to several unresolved issues that could slow passage.

Democrats continue to press for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions. They also want to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

However, Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures, felt that such demands were “actually pretty reasonable,” leaving scope for bipartisan support.

Markets react to regulatory uncertainty

Some market actors have pointed out that the recent volatility has been caused in part by the delay regarding the CLARITY Act. CoinShares recently attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the bill.

Meanwhile, Coinbase Institutional’s head of strategy, John D’Agostino, said on CNBC that he understands why the process has taken time. “It’s a type of legislation that’s much more foundational to the development of crypto or any asset class, really,” he continued.

However, with the Senate on the verge of a markup session, the CLARITY Act is at a crossroads. A balance has to be struck regarding innovation, enforcement, and investor protections. The decision that is to come could determine the future of the crypto markets in the US.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Upbit Enables $CRO Staking, Expanding Cronos Access for Korean Users

TagsBlockchainCryptocrypto regulationDeFiDigital Asset

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the cryptocurrency bill being discussed in the Senate and what is its primary purpose?

AThe bill is called the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act). Its primary purpose is to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

QAccording to the article, what is a major point of disagreement among lawmakers regarding the bill?

AA major point of disagreement is that Democrats are pressing for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions, and to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

QHow did CoinShares link recent market volatility to the CLARITY Act?

ACoinShares attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the next immediate step for the CLARITY Act in the legislative process, as announced by Tim Scott?

AThe next immediate step is a Senate markup session and a vote on market structure scheduled for the following Thursday.

QWhat did Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital suggest about the bill's chances of passing?

AAlex Thorn suggested it remains 'unclear if the two sides can come together,' pointing to several unresolved issues that could slow the bill's passage.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片