CLARITY Act Moves to Senate Markup Next Week, Tim Scott Says

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

Senator Tim Scott announced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will undergo a Senate markup next week, a key step for U.S. crypto legislation. The bill aims to establish a uniform market structure for digital assets. Scott emphasized the importance of the upcoming committee vote, noting months of draft reviews and negotiations. Despite progress, the bill faces unresolved divisions within the industry. Some experts, like Gabriel Shapiro, believe a compromise is possible, while others, such as Alex Thorn, remain skeptical due to ongoing disagreements. Democrats are pushing for stricter measures, including DeFi sanctions compliance and enhanced authority for the OFAC. Regulatory uncertainty has contributed to market volatility, with significant outflows from crypto investment products recently reported. As the Senate prepares to debate the bill, stakeholders emphasize the need to balance innovation, enforcement, and investor protection, as the outcome could shape the future of crypto markets in the U.S.

A Senate markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been announced for next week, marking a critical point in the future of U.S. cryptocurrency legislation, according to Tim Scott. A new cryptocurrency bill has been proposed in order to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

“Next Thursday, we’ll have a vote on market structure,” Scott told Breitbart News on Tuesday. “It’s important for us to get on the record and vote,” Scott added that committee members have reviewed multiple drafts over the past six months, underscoring sustained negotiations ahead of the markup.

Scott’s comments align with December remarks from David Sacks, who said the landmark legislation would reach the Senate in January. The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a measure called the CLARITY Act as of July 2025. Should the Senate enact the legislation unchanged, then it would go straight to Donald Trump for final approval.

Outstanding issues keep the industry divided

Despite the progress, the bill still faces unresolved disagreements. Crypto executives and policy experts have debated its scope since it was introduced in May 2025, and opinions remain split as the Senate vote approaches.

Gabriel Shapiro, founder of MetaLeX, said the U.S. is “probably going to get a crypto market structure bill,” but cautioned that concerns around illicit finance persist. He suggested lawmakers could still reach a compromise to address those risks.

Others express more skepticism. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, said after reviewing notes from a bipartisan Senate meeting that it remains “unclear if the two sides can come together.” Thorn pointed to several unresolved issues that could slow passage.

Democrats continue to press for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions. They also want to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

However, Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures, felt that such demands were “actually pretty reasonable,” leaving scope for bipartisan support.

Markets react to regulatory uncertainty

Some market actors have pointed out that the recent volatility has been caused in part by the delay regarding the CLARITY Act. CoinShares recently attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the bill.

Meanwhile, Coinbase Institutional’s head of strategy, John D’Agostino, said on CNBC that he understands why the process has taken time. “It’s a type of legislation that’s much more foundational to the development of crypto or any asset class, really,” he continued.

However, with the Senate on the verge of a markup session, the CLARITY Act is at a crossroads. A balance has to be struck regarding innovation, enforcement, and investor protections. The decision that is to come could determine the future of the crypto markets in the US.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Upbit Enables $CRO Staking, Expanding Cronos Access for Korean Users

TagsBlockchainCryptocrypto regulationDeFiDigital Asset

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the cryptocurrency bill being discussed in the Senate and what is its primary purpose?

AThe bill is called the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act). Its primary purpose is to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

QAccording to the article, what is a major point of disagreement among lawmakers regarding the bill?

AA major point of disagreement is that Democrats are pressing for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions, and to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

QHow did CoinShares link recent market volatility to the CLARITY Act?

ACoinShares attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the next immediate step for the CLARITY Act in the legislative process, as announced by Tim Scott?

AThe next immediate step is a Senate markup session and a vote on market structure scheduled for the following Thursday.

QWhat did Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital suggest about the bill's chances of passing?

AAlex Thorn suggested it remains 'unclear if the two sides can come together,' pointing to several unresolved issues that could slow the bill's passage.

Lecturas Relacionadas

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片