CLARITY Act Gains Momentum as SEC, CFTC Align and Senate Advances Crypto Rules

ccn.comPublicado a 2026-02-18Actualizado a 2026-02-18

Resumen

U.S. lawmakers and regulators are advancing efforts to establish a clearer regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025), which has passed the House and gained reported White House backing, aims to resolve the long-standing jurisdictional stalemate between the SEC and CFTC. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has urged Congress to pass the bill "this spring." Key developments include the Senate Agriculture Committee advancing its own market-structure bill, which builds upon the CLARITY Act. Furthermore, SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced that the SEC and CFTC are coordinating through "Project Crypto" to develop a clearer token classification approach, serving as a bridge until legislation is enacted. The push seeks to provide predictability for crypto exchanges, brokers, and issuers by defining regulatory oversight and reducing reliance on enforcement-driven interpretations. The end goal is a negotiated legislative package that creates a more stable and defined U.S. crypto framework.

Key Takeaways

Reported White House backing is refocusing attention on the CLARITY Act as Congress debates crypto market structure.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the SEC and CFTC are coordinating via “Project Crypto” as a bridge toward legislation.
The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced a separate market-structure bill it says builds on the House-passed CLARITY Act.

U.S. lawmakers and regulators are ramping up the push for a clearer crypto rulebook as the Senate advances market-structure legislation and the SEC signals deeper coordination with the CFTC ahead of potential reforms.

According to reports, the White House is backing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633) , framing the move as an attempt to break the SEC–CFTC stalemate that has shaped crypto oversight for years.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Feb. 13 that Congress should pass CLARITY “this spring,” as the administration pushes for a clearer market structure for digital assets.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges

Bitget

promotions

New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.

Coins

Claim Offer

Bitunix

promotions

Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.

Coins

Claim Offer

ChangeNow

promotions

Receive 0.4% of the volume from each transaction with your referral link.

Coins

Claim Offer

Explore All Offers

House Passed CLARITY Act, Senate Is Next

The CLARITY Act is already a House product.

The bill text on Congress.gov lays out a framework for regulating digital assets across the SEC and CFTC, with the core objective of clarifying who oversees what in U.S. spot markets.

That makes the Senate the next gate: committee markups, cross-committee negotiations, and whether leadership schedules a market-structure package for a floor vote.

What the Bill Would Change

The bill is designed to reduce the industry’s reliance on enforcement-driven interpretation by creating clearer categories and compliance expectations for intermediaries.

For exchanges, brokers, issuers, and market makers, the prize is predictability.

This means fewer gray-zone listing decisions and a more stable understanding of which regulator is in charge of which activity.

SEC and CFTC Say They’re Coordinating

At a House hearing on Feb. 11, 2026, SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins told lawmakers he supports Congress enacting the CLARITY Act.

He described a joint SEC–CFTC effort dubbed “Project Crypto.”

Atkins said the effort would work toward a clearer token classification approach and would serve as a bridge while legislation moves through Congress.

That coordination matters because implementation is often where market-structure bills bog down.

When agencies start aligning publicly, it signals they expect something durable to emerge from Capitol Hill.

Senate Agriculture Advances a Parallel Framework

The Senate Agriculture Committee said on Jan. 29, 2026, it advanced the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act.

They describe it as legislation that builds on the House-passed CLARITY Act and incorporates provisions negotiated with Senate Democrats.

The takeaway is that the Senate is not starting from scratch.

The likely endgame is a negotiated package that uses CLARITY as the backbone, with Senate-side additions to secure votes and address consumer-protection concerns.

What To Watch Next

The near-term catalysts are procedural: Senate committee markups, Banking–Agriculture coordination, and whether leadership gives market structure floor time.

For now, the direction of travel is clearer than it has been in years: reported White House backing, active Senate drafting, and explicit SEC–CFTC coordination are all pointing toward a more defined U.S. crypto framework, just not on a fixed timeline yet.

Top Picks for Bitcoin

Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) as discussed in the article?

AThe main purpose of the CLARITY Act is to create a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets by defining the oversight roles of the SEC and CFTC, thereby breaking the regulatory stalemate and providing more predictable compliance expectations for crypto market intermediaries like exchanges and brokers.

QWhat is 'Project Crypto' and which regulatory chairs are involved in it?

A'Project Crypto' is a joint coordination effort between the SEC and CFTC, mentioned by SEC Chair Paul Atkins. It aims to develop a clearer approach to token classification and serve as a bridge while comprehensive crypto legislation moves through Congress.

QWhich Senate committee has advanced a bill related to the CLARITY Act, and what is it called?

AThe Senate Agriculture Committee has advanced a related bill called the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, which is described as building upon the House-passed CLARITY Act and incorporates provisions negotiated with Senate Democrats.

QAccording to the article, what did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent say about the timeline for passing the CLARITY Act?

ATreasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on February 13 that Congress should pass the CLARITY Act 'this spring,' as the administration pushes for a clearer market structure for digital assets.

QWhat key benefit does the article suggest the CLARITY Act would provide for crypto exchanges and market participants?

AThe article suggests the CLARITY Act would provide greater predictability for crypto exchanges, brokers, and market makers by reducing reliance on enforcement-driven interpretation, creating clearer regulatory categories, and establishing a more definitive understanding of which regulator oversees which market activity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros