Chainlink: How THIS liquidity cluster could pull LINK to $9

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-13Actualizado a 2026-02-13

Resumen

Chainlink (LINK) gained 5% in a week, rebounding from key support at $7.52 to the $8.39–$8.42 range. Underlying fundamentals strengthened, with reserves climbing to 2 million LINK and a sevenfold increase in revenue. LINK ETFs saw consistent institutional inflows, adding 1.71 million tokens this week alone without any outflows. Technical indicators suggest accumulation, with RSI hitting a historic low and a bullish flag pattern forming. Liquidity is heavily clustered between $9 and $9.3, which may act as a price magnet. However, failure to reclaim this zone risks another downward move.

Chainlink [LINK] gained 5% over the past week after holding support near $7.52. Instead of breaking lower, LINK rebounded toward the $8.39–$8.42 range, shifting short‐term momentum cautiously upward.

Meanwhile, Chainlink’s reserve climbed to 2 million LINK, valued at roughly $17 million. Revenue also increased sevenfold, signaling a sharp acceleration in operational activity.

Notably, this growth was not cosmetic. It reflected strengthening protocol fundamentals beneath the surface.

1.71M LINK ETF weekly inflows

LINK ETFs have posted inflows every week since their launch. This week alone added about 1.71 million LINK. Notably, there have been no recorded outflows, showing that institutions have remained consistently committed.

As a result, accumulation continued quietly beneath surface volatility. Meanwhile, retail participation looked hesitant near resistance. Therefore, capital flows stayed strong despite compressed price action.

KEY support and rebound to $8.39

LINK price tapped the lower boundary of the symmetrical triangle at $7.52.

Instead of breaking down, it rebounded sharply toward the $8.39–$8.42 range. That reaction showed buyers stepped in with intent rather than hesitation.

At press time, the RSI dropped below 32 for the first time in its history. That level screamed accumulation, not panic. Selling pressure looked exhausted, and dip buyers clearly sensed an opportunity.

However, reclaiming higher levels remained unfinished business. Failure to build sustained momentum still risked another liquidity sweep. Therefore, structure held, but conviction required confirmation beyond a relief bounce.

On the lower timeframes, LINK formed a bullish flag, similar to several major caps. Historically, that pattern preceded strong upside expansion. As a result, expectations for a breakout began building aggressively.

At the same time, LINK hovered around the breakout zone on the 4-hour timeframe. Meanwhile, the MACD histogram flipped positive, signaling strengthening bullish momentum. Bulls were no longer passive; they were pressing forward decisively.

Will $9–$9.3 liquidity pull LINK higher?

Looking at CoinGlass data, liquidity clustered heavily between $9 and $9.3. In particular, this zone was built into a visible magnet for price expansion. Therefore, momentum could accelerate if buyers pushed upward decisively.

On the other hand, liquidity between $7.8 and $8 still sat exposed. Looking ahead, the price would likely hunt one side aggressively. The market waited for that decision.


Final Thoughts

  • Reserve growth and relentless ETF inflows strengthened LINK’s underlying position.
  • However, reclaiming $9–$9.3 remained critical to avoid another downside sweep.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat key support level did Chainlink (LINK) hold and rebound from according to the article?

AChainlink held support near $7.52 and rebounded toward the $8.39–$8.42 range.

QWhat two metrics are cited as evidence of strengthening fundamentals for the Chainlink protocol?

AThe article cites Chainlink's reserve climbing to 2 million LINK (worth ~$17M) and a sevenfold increase in revenue as evidence of strengthening fundamentals.

QHow much LINK did ETFs add in the week discussed, and what does the consistent pattern of flows indicate?

ALINK ETFs added about 1.71 million LINK that week. The consistent weekly inflows with no recorded outflows indicate that institutions have remained consistently committed.

QWhat technical pattern on the lower timeframes is described as historically preceding strong upside expansion?

AOn the lower timeframes, LINK formed a bullish flag, which is a pattern that historically precedes strong upside expansion.

QAccording to CoinGlass data, where is a significant cluster of liquidity that could act as a price magnet?

AAccording to CoinGlass data, a significant cluster of liquidity is located between $9 and $9.3, which could act as a magnet for price expansion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报Hace 54 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报Hace 54 min(s)

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar LINK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar ChainLink (LINK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar ChainLink (LINK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu ChainLink (LINK)Después de comprar tu ChainLink (LINK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear ChainLink (LINK)Tradear fácilmente con ChainLink (LINK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.1k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar LINK

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de LINK (LINK).

活动图片