CFTC Withdraws Proposed Ban on Sports and Political Prediction Markets

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-05Actualizado a 2026-02-05

Resumen

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has withdrawn its 2024 proposal to ban sports and political prediction markets. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig stated the agency will not proceed with final rules on the matter and will instead initiate new rulemaking based on a revised interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act. The withdrawn proposal had sought to prohibit event contracts related to topics such as war, terrorism, and other outcomes deemed against public interest. The CFTC also repealed a 2025 staff advisory that had caused confusion. The new rulemaking aims to provide clearer guidelines, reduce regulatory uncertainty, and support innovation while reassessing the CFTC’s role in ongoing litigation regarding event contract jurisdiction. This shift signals a potential alignment of federal regulation with market practices amid ongoing tensions with state governments that often treat such contracts as unlicensed gambling.

The CFTC has pulled its 2024 proposal that aimed to ban sports and political prediction markets, saying it will not proceed with final rules on the issue. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the agency will instead initiate new rulemaking based on a sound interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Proposal Withdrawal and Advisory Repeal

The proposed rule, initially proposed in June 2024, aimed to ban a wide array of event contracts, including those related to wars, terrorism, and other outcomes deemed not in the public interest. The CFTC also withdrew a 2025 staff advisory regarding sports-related event contracts, which it believed had confused in the market.

As Chairman Selig stated, markets were left confused by the advisory, and he hopes the new rulemaking process will provide clearer guidance. The CFTC aims to set standards that will enable innovation and provide clarity for entities subject to CFTC regulation.

In this regard, “event contracts” is a term that defines financial contracts that allow traders to place bets on the outcome of future events, such as election results or sports, as governed by the federal government. The nature of platforms that offer event contracts includes those that offer futures or swap markets for real-world events.

Some prediction markets have faced challenges from the state government, which views event contracts as unlicensed gambling, thus creating a conflict of regulation between the federal and state governments. The withdrawal of the proposal may signal a shift towards aligning federal regulation with market realities.

New Rulemaking on the Horizon

Chairman Selig has directed the staff of the CFTC to initiate a new rule on event contracts that will reflect the new interpretation of the law by the agency. This new interpretation will help to provide a clearer set of guidelines for prediction markets, while at the same time reducing uncertainty for exchanges and intermediaries that list event contracts. Chairman Selig has also stated that the CFTC will reassess its role in current litigation related to the jurisdiction of event contracts.

The withdrawal of the proposed prohibition on sports and political prediction markets by the CFTC is a significant change in the policy of federal regulation of event contracts. The CFTC’s move to withdraw the proposed prohibition in favor of new rulemaking proposals is an attempt to ensure a balance between legal certainty and innovation. As the regulatory environment evolves, the future of prediction markets may be marked by a clean regulatory environment.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Binance Completes Second Bitcoin Purchase for SAFU, Adding 1,315 BTC

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main action taken by the CFTC regarding its 2024 proposal on prediction markets?

AThe CFTC withdrew its 2024 proposal that aimed to ban sports and political prediction markets and will not proceed with final rules on the issue.

QWhat did the CFTC also withdraw alongside the proposed rule, and why?

AThe CFTC also withdrew a 2025 staff advisory regarding sports-related event contracts because it had created confusion in the market.

QAccording to Chairman Selig, what is the CFTC's new approach to event contracts?

AChairman Selig stated the CFTC will initiate new rulemaking based on a sound interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act to provide clearer guidance and enable innovation.

QWhat regulatory conflict is mentioned regarding prediction markets in the United States?

AThere is a conflict between federal and state governments, as some state governments view event contracts as unlicensed gambling.

QWhat is the expected outcome of the CFTC's withdrawal and new rulemaking direction?

AThe move is expected to provide a clearer regulatory framework, reduce uncertainty for exchanges, and align federal regulation with market realities to balance legal certainty and innovation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

Bitcoin has reached a critical juncture around the $60,000 level, which analysts view as a major technical and psychological support zone. According to a TradingView analysis, a successful hold above this demand area could pave the way for a recovery toward $81,000. However, the warning is clear: a decisive and sustained break below $60,000 would invalidate the bullish outlook, likely triggering stop losses and a deeper market correction. The current setup is described as a binary test—maintaining support keeps the recovery narrative alive, while losing it would signal a shift toward a more significant downturn.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

Venus Protocol now allows tokenized stocks from companies like Apple, Tesla, and Microsoft to be used as borrowing collateral on BNB Chain. This integration brings a key real-world asset (RWA) use case into DeFi lending. Users can deposit these tokenized equities, which are described as 1:1 backed by real shares held by regulated custodians, into isolated pools to borrow stablecoins or BNB without selling their underlying positions. This move expands DeFi lending beyond crypto-native assets, resembling traditional margin finance. It highlights BNB Chain's competition for RWA activity and aims to attract more stable liquidity. However, tokenized stocks introduce different risks, including dependency on off-chain custodians and challenges with collateral valuation due to differing market hours between traditional and on-chain trading. While not an immediate price catalyst, this development is significant within broader crypto trends like compliance pressure and RWA tokenization. Success will depend on growing liquidity, reliable custody, robust price oracles, and clear rules for redemptions and liquidations.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BAN

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Comedian (BAN) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Comedian (BAN) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Comedian (BAN)Después de comprar tu Comedian (BAN), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Comedian (BAN)Tradear fácilmente con Comedian (BAN) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

576 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BAN (BAN).