CFTC Chair Says Crypto Market Structure Bill Nears Final Approval

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-18Actualizado a 2026-02-18

Resumen

The long-debated crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, is nearing a critical point in Washington as end-of-month negotiations continue. CFTC Chair Mike Selig expressed strong confidence that the legislation is close to becoming law, aiming to establish clear U.S. rules for digital assets and prevent regulatory overreach. However, a major unresolved issue is whether stablecoins should be allowed to offer yield. Banks oppose such rewards, while crypto industry groups propose a framework permitting yield generation in DeFi systems. Despite ongoing division, another meeting between stakeholders may occur soon to advance the bill.

With the end of the month approaching and negotiations still ongoing, the long-debated crypto market structure legislation known as the CLARITY Act is facing a critical moment in Washington.

The bill, which aims to establish clear rules for digital asset markets in the United States, has encountered significant obstacles in recent weeks as lawmakers, regulators, banks and crypto industry representatives continue to debate key provisions.

Despite the hurdles, newly appointed Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Mike Selig has expressed strong confidence that the legislation is close to becoming law.

CFTC Chief Optimistic On CLARITY Act

In an interview with FOX Business on Tuesday, Selig said the bill is “about to” be signed, signaling optimism that Congress will ultimately push it across the finish line.

“We want to ensure that the legal framework for cryptocurrencies is adaptable to future developments. We cannot allow a second Gary Gensler to come in and destroy everything. We’re going to get this thing across the line,” he added.

Selig’s remarks build on statements he made earlier this month. On February 3, he argued that the market structure bill moving through Congress could position the United States as the “gold standard” for crypto regulation.

According to Selig, the industry has operated for too long without clear guidelines, causing businesses and innovation to migrate offshore. “The goal [of this legislation] is just to get some clarity.

It’s been too long with these markets just languishing, and they’ve fled offshore,” he said at the time. He also projected that a finalized bill could land on President Donald Trump’s desk “in the next couple of months,” praising the president’s leadership and support for the cryptocurrency sector.

However, as the White House’s end-of-month deadline looms, a major sticking point remains unresolved: whether stablecoins should be permitted to offer yield.

Crypto, Banks Remain Divided On Stablecoin Rewards

Journalist Eleanor Terrett reported Monday for Crypto In America that discussions between the crypto and banking industries have yet to produce a compromise on the issue, which is widely seen as the linchpin for advancing the CLARITY Act.

Last Tuesday, policy staff from banks and crypto firms met at the White House. The meeting concluded without agreement after banking representatives circulated a one-page document titled “Yield and Interest Prohibition Principles,” which argued that stablecoins should not provide yield or rewards to holders.

In response, the Digital Chamber, a trade group representing more than 130 crypto firms and several traditional banks with digital asset exposure, released its own proposed framework on Friday.

The organization suggested principles that would allow payment stablecoins to generate yield within decentralized finance (DeFi) systems.

The group said its recommendations are intended to preserve stablecoins as payment tools, safeguard DeFi liquidity and reinforce US dollar dominance, while introducing a rigorous, data-driven method to assess potential impacts on bank deposits.

Banks have not formally responded to the Digital Chamber’s proposal. However, a source close to the Senate Banking Committee described the document to Crypto In America as “constructive,” though cautioning that some elements may be too broad to gain full support from financial institutions.

The next steps remain uncertain. Patrick Witt, executive director of the White House Crypto Council, told Yahoo Finance on Friday that another meeting could take place as early as this week, though no specific date was provided.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.29 trillion as of Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from Openart, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure legislation discussed in the article and who expressed confidence in its approval?

AThe legislation is called the CLARITY Act. Newly appointed Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Mike Selig expressed strong confidence that it is close to becoming law.

QAccording to CFTC Chair Mike Selig, what is the main goal of the CLARITY Act?

AThe main goal of the legislation is to provide clarity and establish a clear legal framework for digital asset markets in the United States, which has been lacking and causing businesses to move offshore.

QWhat is the major unresolved issue preventing the advancement of the CLARITY Act, as reported by journalist Eleanor Terrett?

AThe major unresolved issue is whether stablecoins should be permitted to offer yield or rewards to their holders.

QHow did the banking industry and the Digital Chamber's proposals on stablecoin yields differ?

ABanking representatives argued that stablecoins should not provide any yield or rewards. In contrast, the Digital Chamber proposed a framework that would allow payment stablecoins to generate yield within decentralized finance (DeFi) systems.

QWhat did CFTC Chair Mike Selig say about the potential impact of this legislation on the United States?

ASelig argued that the market structure bill could position the United States as the 'gold standard' for cryptocurrency regulation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences

Founder of Baixing.com Shares 14 Personal Tips for Using Claude Code The author outlines his personal, non-universal strategies for maximizing Claude Code. Key points include: focusing deeply on one primary tool (Claude Code) rather than constant comparison; mastering essential shortcuts for the editor and command line; utilizing voice input like HoldSpeak; starting projects with a structured PROJECT.md file; defaulting to Claude agents for most tasks; and leveraging integrations with GitHub and Cloudflare for build, deployment, and infrastructure. He emphasizes a clear separation between human and machine work: manually maintain a core CLAUDE.md file, and understand AI-generated content by asking the AI, not reading its raw code. Efficient communication involves dragging files (screenshots, audio, documents) directly into the interface. For knowledge management, he recommends a centralized, Git-synced memory system based on ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md to ensure permanence and avoid scattered project memories. Other practices include writing and continuously refining "Skills," using the expensive but reliable ultracode for complex dynamic workflows, and employing Git documentation as handoff points between agents. The overarching philosophy is to treat Claude Code like a horse (or a person) with its own pathfinding abilities—setting goals and boundaries rather than micromanaging every turn.

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

**Title:** Agent Economy and AI Sub-Microeconomics - Gary Yang **Summary:** Following the AI singularity, the pace of evolution has accelerated rapidly, creating new generational disparities in technological advancement globally. While many regions are still grappling with single-agent bottlenecks, Silicon Valley has moved ahead into the next dimension: the Agent Economy and A2A ecosystems. The article outlines six key areas of this emerging paradigm: 1. **AI Payment Competition & H2A Bottlenecks:** A fierce battle for AI Agent payment protocol standards is underway (e.g., MPP, x402). However, most current efforts remain Human-to-Agent (H2A), essentially grafting AI onto traditional human-centric commerce, which creates a non-AI-native bottleneck. The true potential lies in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) autonomous economies. 2. **Agent Economy & the Inevitable A2A Trend:** The Agent Economy is defined by autonomous AI Agents creating, exchanging, and capitalizing value as independent economic actors. The A2A ecosystem describes their interactions. This represents the next major investment frontier, akin to the early days of e-commerce or DeFi, but with faster iteration and an AI-native, efficiency-first perspective that often diverges from human needs. 3. **AI Protocol vs. Crypto Protocol:** AI Protocols are the foundational rules for Agent interaction in an open network (communication, discovery, collaboration), akin to the governance and economic laws of the AI world. Currently, they focus on communication and weak boundaries, unlike Crypto Protocols which emphasize asset rights and clear ownership. While they appear different due to political-economic factors and legacy system constraints, their eventual convergence into a unified Digital Protocol system is seen as inevitable, driven by first principles. 4. **AI Agent Sub-Microeconomics & Biological Analogy:** AI Agent economics differ fundamentally from human economics: higher frequency/lower value transactions, energy/value direct correlation, efficiency-driven (not emotional) decisions, task-oriented (not consumption-oriented) behavior, and near-zero organizational/communication costs. A powerful analogy frames the Agent economy as a biological system: the LLM is the nucleus, the Agent harness is the cytoplasm, the Agent itself is a cell, its communication protocol is the cell membrane, and external tools (Skills, Prompts) are the extracellular environment. 5. **The Inevitability of AIFi & FinChip:** AIFi (AI Finance) represents the financial system where AI-native value within the Agent economy is tokenized and exchanged. Unlike TradFi/DeFi where value resides *in* finance, in AIFi, value originates *in* AI, and finance becomes its form. This shift is enabled by Agents taking over value discovery. FinChip (Financial Chip) is introduced as a key infrastructure—a fusion of AI autonomy and crypto smart contracts—forming intelligent financial assets to power the future A2A economy. 6. **AI-Native as a Paradigm Shift:** Adopting AI is not akin to "Internet+". It requires AI-Native thinking—designing systems based on first principles, the shortest energy-value path, and maximum efficiency. This abstract, counter-intuitive logic poses a significant, ongoing challenge for all practitioners, as effective, generalized upgrade methodologies will be slow to emerge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片