Centrifuge and Pharos Partner to Expand Onchain Access for Institutional Assets

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-17Actualizado a 2026-02-17

Resumen

Centrifuge and Pharos have partnered to enhance the distribution and usability of institutional-grade onchain assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The collaboration addresses key challenges in institutional onchain finance, including fragmented distribution, regulatory barriers, and limited post-issuance activity outside the U.S. and Western Europe. By integrating Centrifuge’s tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’ high-performance Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified ecosystem for asset accessibility, liquidity, and execution. Both CEOs emphasize that tokenization alone is insufficient—the focus is on building robust infrastructure to enable active, composable financial systems for institutional assets.

Today, Centrifuge and Pharos announced a collaboration aimed at facilitating the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain via a common infrastructure architecture, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

The partnership focuses on addressing distribution, one of the main issues facing institutional onchain finance. Even though tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets are still inaccessible, dispersed across platforms, or passive after they are issued. The goal of this collaboration is to make institutional assets useable in live onchain financial systems when they are issued.

Regulatory, onboarding, custody, and operational barriers still affect access to U.S. dollar-denominated credit and treasury products in many areas outside of the U.S. and Western Europe. Even with tokenization, these goods’ distribution is often dispersed and indirect, which restricts their capacity to actively spread once onchain or reach new users.

The collaboration tackles these issues at the system level by fusing Pharos’ inclusive, execution-first Layer 1 with Centrifuge’s institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards. With its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, Pharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued via Centrifuge, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance. Assets may be accessible, pooled, allocated, and reused instead of being static after issue thanks to this integrated ecosystem, which includes wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capability.

“Tokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem,” said Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs. “This partnership focuses on building the distribution and infrastructure layer that allows institutional assets to function within real onchain financial environments.”

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 that uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations. The network is designed to support ongoing onchain operations and accommodate significant institutional asset activity.

“The challenge isn’t demand, it’s infrastructure,” said Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos. “This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can move onchain and remain active within open, composable financial systems.”

This collaboration is a first step toward practical onchain finance, in which institutional assets are backed by infrastructure intended for long-term participation, distribution, and execution in addition to being represented onchain.

As the future financial-grade infrastructure of global finance for everyone, Pharos is the inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where institutional-grade assets and real value move onchain and may be combined with decentralized assets. To enable asset-native ecosystems, Pharos blends deep-parallel execution, modular design, and built-in compliance. Supported by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other international TradFi investors, the project was developed by Ant Group’s engineers and leadership.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main goal of the partnership between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to facilitate the large-scale distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets onchain, making them usable in live onchain financial systems upon issuance.

QWhat specific types of institutional assets are mentioned in the collaboration?

AThe collaboration focuses on tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA).

QAccording to Centrifuge Labs' CEO, what problem does tokenization alone not solve?

ATokenization alone does not solve the access and usability problem for institutional assets onchain.

QWhat role does Pharos play in this partnership according to the article?

APharos acts as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer with its high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity, enabling deeper onchain liquidity pathways and wider capital entrance.

QWhat are some key technical features of the Pharos network mentioned in the article?

APharos uses a modular architecture and native deep-parallel execution to facilitate high-throughput, real-world financial operations and support ongoing onchain institutional asset activity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Hace 35 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Hace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片