Centrifuge and Pharos Collaborate to Advance On-Chain Distribution Infrastructure for Institutional Assets

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-17Actualizado a 2026-02-17

Resumen

Centrifuge and Pharos have announced a collaboration to build shared on-chain infrastructure for the scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The partnership addresses a core challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. While tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets remain siloed, inaccessible, or become inactive after issuance. A key issue is that access to dollar-denominated products like credit and Treasuries remains restricted in many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe due to regulatory, operational, and custodial barriers. Even when tokenized, these assets are often distributed in a fragmented way, limiting their reach and usability within active on-chain financial systems. By integrating Centrifuge’s institutional tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’s “inclusive, execution-first” Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified environment for asset distribution, liquidity, and continuous on-chain operation. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets originated through Centrifuge, enabling deeper liquidity pathways and broader capital access. Centrifuge Labs CEO Bhaji Illuminati emphasized that “tokenization alone doesn’t solve accessibility and usability,” underscoring the need for distribution infrastructure. Pharos CEO Wish Wu noted that “the challeng...

February 17, 2026 - Centrifuge and Pharos announced today a collaboration aimed at enabling institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), to achieve scaled distribution and operation on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

This collaboration focuses on addressing a key challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. Although significant progress has been made in asset tokenization, a large number of institutional assets remain difficult to access, fragmented across different platforms, or become "static assets" after issuance, lacking continuous use cases. This collaboration aims to ensure that institutional assets do not merely stop at on-chain issuance but remain continuously usable within a functioning, real on-chain financial system.

In many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe, access to dollar-denominated credit and treasury products still faces regulatory, account registration, custody, and operational hurdles. Even when these products are tokenized, their distribution often remains indirect and fragmented, limiting their ability to reach new participants and their potential for active deployment and use after being brought on-chain.

By combining Centrifuge's institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards with Pharos's "inclusive, execution-first" Layer 1, this collaboration addresses these challenges at a systemic level. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital inflow and create deeper on-chain liquidity pathways. This integrated environment covers wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capabilities, enabling assets to be accessed, aggregated, allocated, and reused, rather than remaining idle long after issuance.

Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs, stated: "Tokenization alone does not solve the problems of accessibility and usability. The focus of this collaboration is to build the distribution and infrastructure layers that allow institutional assets to function within a real on-chain financial environment."

Pharos is positioned as an inclusive financial Layer 1, supporting high-throughput real-world financial workflows through native deep parallel execution and a modular architecture. The network is designed to host large-scale institutional asset activities and enable continuous on-chain operations.

Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos, stated: "The challenge is not demand, but infrastructure. This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can migrate on-chain and remain active within an open, composable financial system."

This collaboration is an early step towards "operational onchain finance": institutional assets are not only mapped onto the chain but are also supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement.

Pharos Network

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where real value and institutional-grade assets can circulate on-chain and achieve composability with decentralized assets, thereby becoming the next generation of financial-grade infrastructure for the global economy. Pharos combines a modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities to drive the development of an "asset-native" ecosystem. The project is built by a management and engineering team from Ant Group and is backed by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other global traditional finance (TradFi) investors.

Official website: https://www.pharos.xyz/

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main goal of the collaboration between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to enable scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

QWhat key challenge in institutional onchain finance does this partnership aim to address?

AThe partnership aims to address the challenge of distribution, ensuring that institutional assets are not just tokenized but remain actively usable within a functioning onchain financial system.

QHow does Pharos contribute to this collaboration?

APharos serves as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital access and deeper onchain liquidity pathways.

QWhat is Pharos Network's primary focus as a Layer 1 blockchain?

APharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, designed to enable the circulation of real-world and institutional-grade assets on-chain with composability with decentralized assets, featuring modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities.

QAccording to the CEOs, what is the broader vision behind this partnership?

AThe broader vision is to move towards 'operational onchain finance,' where institutional assets are not only tokenized but are actively supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement in an open, composable financial system.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

The 2026 Q1 earnings season reveals a paradox: while AI helps companies freeze hiring and boost productivity, the soaring costs of AI inference—token consumption and GPU depreciation—are eroding savings from workforce reductions. Shopify reported that AI now writes over 50% of its code, enabling significant output with stable headcount. However, LLM costs, driven by heavy usage of its AI assistant Sidekick, are pressuring its subscription毛利率. Similarly, Roblox attributed a quarter of its full-year利润率下调 to increased AI investment. The article highlights a broader industry imbalance: combined AI capital expenditure for Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Google is projected to reach $725 billion in 2026, vastly outpacing potential savings from layoffs. For instance, Meta's planned裁员 would save about $2.4 billion annually, offsetting only ~12% of its incremental AI depreciation. While底层 model and chip suppliers like NVIDIA maintain high profitability, application-layer companies face a pricing squeeze. Their strategies now involve要么 tightly linking AI costs to user engagement (like Shopify) or introducing fees for advanced AI features (like Roblox), as covering AI bills with裁员 savings alone is financially unsustainable.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 39 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Hace 44 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Hace 44 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros