CEA Chair Stephen Miran Resigns, Expresses Support for Rate Cuts as Crypto Prices Plunge

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

Stephen Miran, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), has resigned from his White House position. His departure, described as non-political, follows his earlier commitment to a short tenure. Miran expressed support for interest rate cuts in 2026, aligning with President Trump's stance, citing current monetary policy as "too tight" despite inflation being above the 2% target. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency prices have significantly declined, with the total market cap dropping nearly 2% to $2.59 trillion. Bitcoin fell 2.79%, and other major tokens like ETH and BNB also saw losses. This downturn coincides with market uncertainty from conflicting signals on future rate cuts, as the Federal Reserve appears less inclined to reduce rates. Billionaire investor Ken Griffin attributed the US dollar's recent loss in value to volatile fiscal policy and rate cut expectations. He welcomed the appointment of the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, who supports rate cuts, which could potentially boost investor appetite for risky assets like cryptocurrencies.

The Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) Chair, Stephen Miran, has resigned from his White House position. He earlier came out in support of more rate cuts in 2026, something that aligns with the US President Donald Trump’s statement. Crypto prices have plunged over the last 24 hours; however, a statement by Ken Griffin on the US Dollar may have also played a role here.

Stephen Miran Bids Adieu as CEA Chair

The resignation of Stephen Miran is reportedly not political, given his tenure was originally set for a short time. He had committed to the Senate about leaving the White House position if it ever lasted longer than it should. Miran was recently placed on unpaid leave, and the decision comes days after Kevin Warsh’s confirmed selection for the next US Fed Chair.

According to the resignation letter, reviewed by Reuters, Miran called for the importance of staying true to his word as he continues to work at the Federal Reserve.

Stephen earlier interacted with the media and confirmed his support for rate cuts in 2026. He acknowledged that inflation was above the 2% target, but emphasized that underlying price pressures were benign. He also called the current monetary policy too tight for the economy.

Crypto Prices Plunge

On the contrary, the US Federal Reserve is less likely to cut rates in 2026. Two different approaches to rate cuts are possibly leading the crypto market, and thereby crypto prices, to uncertainty. As a result, the prices are down, led by BTC, which has declined by 2.79% over the last 24 hours.

The collective market cap has dropped 1.97% of its value to reach around $2.59 trillion, once above the $3 trillion milestone. The FGI has shifted to 14 points. Also down are other top tokens, including, but not limited to, ETH (-2.52%), BNB (-2.52%), and XRP (-1.15%), in a single day.

Kevin Griffin on USD

Kevin Griffin, a notable & billionaire investor, believes that the US Dollar has lost its value in the last 12 months. According to a report by Reuters, Kevin has attributed this loss to volatile fiscal policy and expectations around rate cuts by the US Fed.

Nevertheless, he has welcomed the appointment of Kevin Warsh, who is in favor of rate cuts. If so, then it could positively influence the appetite of investors to allocate their funds to risky segments, the crypto market in this case. Meanwhile, his statement on the US Dollar has drawn attention to the limit at which investors want to stick to risky ventures.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Kraken Parent Payward Sees Revenue Surge on Trading Boom

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Stephen Miran resign as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA)?

AHis resignation was reportedly not political, as his tenure was originally set for a short time. He had previously committed to the Senate about leaving the White House position if it lasted longer than intended.

QWhat is Stephen Miran's stance on interest rate cuts?

AStephen Miran expressed support for more rate cuts in 2026. He acknowledged that inflation was above the 2% target but emphasized that underlying price pressures were benign and called the current monetary policy 'too tight' for the economy.

QWhat was the impact on the cryptocurrency market mentioned in the article?

ACryptocurrency prices plunged, with the collective market cap dropping 1.97% to around $2.59 trillion. Bitcoin (BTC) led the decline, falling 2.79% in 24 hours, followed by other major tokens like ETH and BNB.

QWhat reason did Kevin Griffin give for the US Dollar losing its value?

AKevin Griffin attributed the US Dollar's loss in value over the last 12 months to volatile fiscal policy and expectations around interest rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve.

QHow might the appointment of Kevin Warsh as the next US Fed Chair influence the market?

AAs Kevin Warsh is in favor of rate cuts, his appointment could positively influence investor appetite to allocate funds to risky segments, such as the cryptocurrency market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

"Vertical Integration Capital Aggregators: How Web3 Builds Unbreachable Moats" explores how leading Web3 protocols create competitive advantages by vertically integrating multiple ecosystem components. Unlike Web2 aggregators that focus on user demand or supplier commoditization, successful Web3 entities like Hyperliquid aggregate capital, liquidity, users, and distribution into a unified financial ecosystem. This integration allows for efficient capital deployment—Hyperliquid generates $0.30 in fees per $1 of TVL annually, compared to Aave's $0.05—while creating a defensible moat that is difficult to replicate across six simultaneous fronts. However, this model comes with risks: DeFi loses $0.50 to hacks for every $1 earned, pushing protocols toward partial centralization and closed systems for security and scalability. The token serves as a shared incentive layer, aligning stakeholders and driving value through mechanisms like buybacks. The article concludes that vertical integration, not capital itself, is the true moat, and that the industry is evolving toward pragmatic, partially centralized models to ensure economic growth and sustainability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Vertically Integrated Capital Aggregators: How Does Web3 Build an Impregnable Moat?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

Summary: Angela Lipps, a woman from Tennessee, was wrongfully imprisoned for 160 days after a facial recognition AI incorrectly identified her as a suspect in a bank fraud case in North Dakota. Despite her insistence that she had never been to the state, she was arrested in July 2025 and held without bail. She spent 108 days in a local jail before being transferred to North Dakota in October, where she was eventually cleared after her lawyer provided bank records proving she was buying pizza in Tennessee at the time of the crime. Her ordeal highlights a growing issue with AI-driven law enforcement errors. Similar cases include Robert Williams, detained for 30 hours in 2020, and Chris Gatlin, jailed for 17 months based on flawed AI matches. Systems like Clearview AI, used by over 3,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies, often rely on low-quality images and can produce inaccurate results. Human oversight failures exacerbate the problem, as officers sometimes skip verification steps, leading to wrongful arrests. While AI has improved policing efficiency, its errors have serious consequences, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations and human accountability in its use.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Falsely Accused by AI and Jailed for 160 Days: American Woman Steps into the Execution Zone

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros