Buybacks and Telegram fuel LIT’s 40% surge, but can the rally extend itself?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-04-09Actualizado a 2026-04-09

Resumen

LIT, the native token of Peter Thiel-backed Lighter perpetual DEX, surged 40% in April, driven by an aggressive buyback program and a key Telegram integration. The project has repurchased and locked 10 million LIT (4% of the 250 million circulating supply) and is buying back tokens at a rate of about 1% per month. Meanwhile, Telegram’s integration of Lighter for leveraged trading attracted 40,000 new users. Despite this, open interest saw only a modest increase, though daily revenue rose from $35K to over $100K. A trader cautioned that the rally faces a key resistance level at the 200-EMA, and further gains depend on bulls flipping it into support.

Peter Thiel-backed Lighter perpetual DEX has accelerated the buyback of its native LIT token. On 08 April, the project announced it had bought and locked 10 million LIT. This translated to 4% of the current circulation of 250 million tokens since its debut last December.

A month ago, the buyback program was at 3% of the circulating supply. At its current pace, the project is buying back about 1% of supply or an average of 2.4 million LIT per month. If the trend persists, it would take the DEX about 10 months to lock the entire current circulating supply.

Worth pointing out, however, that LIT’s total supply is capped at 1 billion, and only 250 million LIT tokens were released after the debut. The first wave of unlocks will begin in December 2026.

In the meantime, how is the market responding to the aggressive LIT buyback though?

Telegram spikes Lighter traction

Well, the reception has been very positive and bullish. Since late March, the token has recovered by over 40%, rising from a record low of $0.74 to above $1.13.

LIT’s uptrend momentum was further boosted by a recent Telegram integration. The privacy-focused messenger will use Lighter to power its native trading with up to 50x leverage across crypto and non-crypto assets.

It’s been about a week since the Telegram integration. So, AMBCrypto dug deeper to check whether the partnership is driving meaningful traction for the DEX or not.

According to Lightalytics data, Lighter recorded about 40K new registered users after the Telegram update.

Source: Lightalytics

Will LIT extend the 40% rally?

However, the Open Interest (OI), which tracks users’ opened bets, posted only a slight improvement.

The OI rose by about $40 from $675 million to $717 million. Interestingly, the little traction saw daily revenue rise from $35K to over $100K over the last seven days.

Source: DeFiLlama

Since most of the revenue is being channeled to buybacks, any further improved traction could help bolster LIT’s recovery.

Even so, a trader recently cautioned that the rally had hit the 200-EMA (Exponential Moving Average) – A key dynamic resistance that may derail bulls in the near-term. An extended rally could only be confirmed if bulls flip the 200-EMA into support.

Source: X

Final Summary

  • Lighter’s buyback program has hit 10 million LIT or 4% of the circulating supply of 250 million.
  • Aggressive buyback program and Telegram integration fueled LIT’s 40% rally in April.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current percentage of LIT's circulating supply that has been bought back by the project?

AThe project has bought back 4% of the current circulating supply of 250 million LIT tokens.

QWhat two main factors are credited with fueling LIT's 40% price surge in April?

AThe aggressive buyback program and the integration with Telegram fueled LIT's 40% rally.

QHow many new registered users did Lighter record after the Telegram integration was announced?

ALighter recorded about 40,000 new registered users after the Telegram update.

QWhat key technical resistance level did the rally hit, according to a trader's caution?

AThe rally hit the 200-EMA (Exponential Moving Average), which is a key dynamic resistance that could derail the bulls in the near-term.

QWhen is the first wave of LIT token unlocks scheduled to begin?

AThe first wave of unlocks is scheduled to begin in December 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHace 18 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHace 18 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar LIT

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Lighter (LIT) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Lighter (LIT) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Lighter (LIT)Después de comprar tu Lighter (LIT), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Lighter (LIT)Tradear fácilmente con Lighter (LIT) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

490 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.01.15Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar LIT

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de LIT (LIT).

活动图片