Breaking Through $500 Again: Why Is ZEC Outperforming While Bitcoin Trades Sideways?

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-29Actualizado a 2025-12-29

Resumen

Zcash (ZEC), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has surged past $500, marking a significant rally of nearly 40% from recent lows and a 13x increase since mid-2025. This growth occurred while Bitcoin remained range-bound between $80k–$90k, highlighting ZEC’s independent momentum. The rise reflects a broader market reassessment of privacy as a core monetary attribute in response to increasing financial surveillance, institutionalization of Bitcoin, and the global rollout of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). ZEC’s value proposition lies in its robust privacy features, enabled by zero-knowledge cryptography, which offers transactional anonymity similar to physical cash—a feature Bitcoin inherently lacks due to its transparent ledger. This positions ZEC as a hedge against surveillance states and the risks of Bitcoin’s centralization, as nearly 24% of BTC supply is held by regulated custodians vulnerable to potential seizure. Key infrastructure upgrades, such as Sapling and Orchard, have drastically improved ZEC’s usability by reducing memory use and proof generation time, while the Zashi mobile wallet and NEAR Intents integration have simplified private transactions and enhanced accessibility. ZEC’s declining correlation with BTC and rising beta indicate that the market is pricing in a distinct privacy premium. Rather than competing with Bitcoin, ZEC complements it by addressing privacy needs that Bitcoin intentionally omits, solidifying its role as a specialized ...

Editor's Note: While Bitcoin repeatedly "paints the door," trading sideways in the $80,000 to $90,000 range, market attention likely remains largely focused on Bitcoin itself. However, ZEC, a representative asset in the privacy sector, has once again charted its own independent trajectory, breaking through the $500 mark again to currently trade at $518, representing a nearly 40% increase from its recent low. More ironically, ZEC was once included in Binance's voting candidate list for delisting, yet it has welcomed its own breakout moment in the latter half of 2025, with a阶段性涨幅 (stage gain) once approaching 13x.

This shift from a "peripheral asset" to being "repriced by the market" also raises a more compelling question: Is ZEC's rise merely a short-term concentrated宣泄 (vent) of sentiment and capital manipulation, or is privacy as a monetary attribute being systematically revalued? Messari attempts to explain why ZEC is being rediscovered by the market at this specific juncture, examining multiple dimensions such as monetary attributes, regulatory environment, and structural changes in Bitcoin. The following content is excerpted from @MessariCrypto's "The Crypto Theses 2026".

Among all crypto assets outside of BTC and ETH, ZEC experienced the most significant shift in "monetary attribute perception" in 2025. For a long time, ZEC existed outside the "monetary hierarchy of cryptocurrencies," seen as a niche privacy coin rather than a true monetary asset. However, as concerns about financial surveillance intensify, and Bitcoin accelerates towards institutionalization, privacy is once again being viewed by the market as a core monetary attribute, not merely a preference for a few geeks or ideological groups.

Bitcoin has proven that non-sovereign digital currencies can operate on a global scale; but it does not preserve the privacy attributes people were accustomed to with physical cash. Every transaction is broadcast to a completely transparent public ledger, traceable and analyzable by anyone using a block explorer. The irony is stark: a tool originally intended to weaken state control has inadvertently built a financial "panopticon".

Zcash combines Bitcoin's monetary policy with the privacy attributes of physical cash through zero-knowledge cryptography. In the current digital asset system, no other asset can provide the long-term, battle-tested, and deterministic privacy guarantees offered by the latest Zcash privacy pools. This makes ZEC a form of "private money" that is extremely difficult to replicate.

We believe the market is repricing ZEC relative to BTC based on this very point—viewing it as an "ideal form of private cryptocurrency" and positioning it as a hedge against the rise of the surveillance state and the institutionalization process of Bitcoin.

Year-to-date, ZEC has gained 666% against BTC, its market capitalization has risen to approximately $7 billion, and it briefly surpassed XMR in market cap to become the largest privacy coin. This relative strength indicates the market is viewing both ZEC and XMR as viable forms of private cryptocurrency.

Privacy on Bitcoin: A Nearly Impossible Path

It is almost impossible for Bitcoin to introduce a privacy pool architecture similar to Zcash at the protocol layer; therefore, the notion that "Bitcoin will ultimately absorb Zcash's value proposition" is unfounded.

The Bitcoin community is known for its highly conservative technical culture, prioritizing mechanism ossification to minimize attack surfaces and maintain the monetary system's integrity. Embedding privacy features at the protocol layer would require modifications to Bitcoin's core architecture, introducing potential inflation vulnerability risks that threaten its core monetary credibility. For Zcash, this risk is acceptable because privacy is its core value proposition.

Furthermore, introducing zero-knowledge cryptography at the base layer would significantly reduce blockchain scalability. To prevent double-spending, nullifiers and hashed note structures are required, leading to long-term concerns about "state bloat." Nullifiers are essentially an ever-growing list, increasing over time and potentially causing a substantial rise in the resource cost required to run nodes. If nodes are forced to store an ever-expanding set of nullifiers, Bitcoin's decentralization would be substantially weakened as the barrier to running a node increases over time.

As mentioned earlier, in the absence of a soft fork capable of supporting ZK verification (e.g., OP_CAT), no Bitcoin Layer 2 solution can achieve Zcash-level privacy while inheriting Bitcoin's security. You either introduce trusted intermediaries (like federation structures), accept long and highly interactive withdrawal delays (like the BitVM model), or outright outsource execution and security to an independent system (like sovereign Rollups).

Until this landscape changes, there is no practical path that simultaneously offers both Bitcoin's security and Zcash's privacy. This is precisely the fundamental reason why ZEC possesses unique value as a private cryptocurrency.

A Privacy Hedge Against CBDCs

The urgency for privacy is further amplified against the backdrop of the陆续登场 (sequential rollout) of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) worldwide. Currently, about half of the world's countries are researching or have already launched a CBDC.

The core feature of CBDCs is "programmability": the issuer can not only track every transaction but also directly control how, when, and where the funds can be used. Funds can even be programmed to be valid only at specified merchants or within specific geographical boundaries.

This is not a dystopian fantasy but a present reality:

· Nigeria (2020): During the EndSARS protests against police brutality, the Nigerian Central Bank froze the bank accounts of several protest organizers and feminist groups, forcing the movement to rely on cryptocurrencies to sustain operations.

· United States (2020–2025): Regulators and large banks implemented de-banking against a series of legal but politically unpopular industries citing "reputational risk." The issue became severe enough for the White House to order an investigation, and an OCC research report in 2025 documented systematic restrictions on the oil & gas, firearms, adult content, and crypto industries.

· Canada (2022): During the "Freedom Convoy" protests, the Canadian government invoked the Emergencies Act to freeze the bank and crypto accounts of protesters and small donors without court orders. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police even blacklisted 34 self-custodied crypto wallet addresses, requiring all regulated exchanges to cease transactions with them. This event clearly demonstrated that Western democracies are also willing to weaponize the financial system to suppress political dissent.

In an era where "money can be programmed to control you," ZEC offers a clear "exit mechanism." But Zcash's significance extends beyond escaping CBDCs; it is becoming increasingly important for protecting Bitcoin itself.

An Insurance Mechanism Against Bitcoin's "Co-option"

As emphasized by figures like Naval Ravikant and Balaji Srinivasan, Zcash is essentially an insurance policy for preserving Bitcoin's vision of financial freedom.

Bitcoin is rapidly concentrating towards centralized entities: centralized exchanges hold ~3 million BTC, ETFs hold ~1.3 million, and public companies hold ~829,000. Combined, approximately 5.1 million BTC (24% of total supply) is currently held by third-party custodians.

This means theoretically, nearly a quarter of the BTC supply is at risk of regulatory confiscation. This structure highly resembles the centralized conditions during the US government's gold confiscation in 1933. Back then, the US government, via Executive Order 6102,强制公民 (forced citizens) to surrender gold holdings exceeding $100, exchanging them for paper currency at a fixed price, a process accomplished through the banking system without reliance on violence.

For Bitcoin, the path is identical. Regulators don't need your private keys; they only need legal jurisdiction over the custodian. Once the government issues an enforcement order to entities like BlackRock or Coinbase, these companies, under legal obligation, can only freeze and transfer the held BTC. Without modifying a single line of code, nearly a quarter of the BTC supply could be "nationalized" overnight.

Moreover, self-custody is no longer a sufficient defense given the blockchain's high transparency. Any BTC withdrawn from a KYC exchange or brokerage account ultimately leaves a traceable "paper trail."

BTC holders can sever this custodial and regulatory link by converting to Zcash, achieving an air gap for their wealth. Once funds enter Zcash's privacy pools, their destination becomes a cryptographic "black hole" to observers. Regulators can see funds leave the Bitcoin network but cannot ascertain their final destination. Of course, the strength of this anonymity depends entirely on operational security: address reuse or acquiring assets through KYC exchanges leaves permanent associations before entering the privacy pool.

The Path to PMF Is Being Paved

The demand for private money has always existed; the problem was that Zcash was historically difficult to "get in front of users." For a long time, high memory usage, lengthy proof generation times, and complex desktop configurations made private transactions slow and daunting for average users. A series of recent infrastructure breakthroughs have systematically removed these barriers.

The Sapling upgrade reduced memory requirements by 97% (to ~40MB) and proof time by 81% (~7 seconds), enabling mobile private transactions.

While Sapling solved the speed issue, the trusted setup remained a concern for the privacy community. Subsequently, Orchard removed the reliance on trusted setups entirely by introducing Halo 2 and introduced Unified Addresses, integrating transparent and shielded addresses into a single entry point, significantly reducing user cognitive load.

These improvements culminated in the release of the Zashi mobile wallet in March 2024. Leveraging the abstract design of Unified Addresses, Zashi simplified the operation of private transactions to a few taps on the screen, making "privacy" the default experience.

With the UX problem solved, distribution became the final hurdle. Users still relied on centralized exchanges to deposit and withdraw ZEC to their wallets. The integration of NEAR Intents eliminated user dependence on centralized exchanges, allowing them to directly swap assets like BTC, ETH for shielded ZEC, or even use private ZEC to pay to any address on 20 different chains.

These initiatives collectively helped Zcash bypass historical friction, access global liquidity, and connect with genuine market demand.

Looking Ahead

Since 2019, the rolling correlation coefficient between ZEC and BTC has持续下行 (continuously declined), dropping from 0.90 to a recent 0.24; meanwhile, ZEC's rolling Beta against BTC has risen to historical highs. This divergence indicates that the market is assigning an independent premium to Zcash's privacy attributes.

We do not believe ZEC will surpass BTC. Bitcoin, with its transparent supply and auditability, has established itself as the most reliable cryptocurrency; whereas Zcash, as a privacy coin, still inevitably bears the trade-off between privacy and auditability.

But ZEC can absolutely carve out its own niche without replacing BTC. The two are not solving the same problem but play different roles within the cryptocurrency system: BTC is a "sound cryptocurrency" optimized for transparency and security, while ZEC is a "private cryptocurrency" built for privacy and confidentiality.

In this sense, ZEC's success does not depend on defeating Bitcoin, but on complementing the attributes that Bitcoin deliberately abandoned.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why former Bank of America strategist sees an Ethereum ‘tactical bottom’

Stephen Suttmeier, former Bank of America strategist, identifies a potential "tactical bottom" for Ethereum (ETH), contingent on the price holding above $1690-$1700 and reclaiming $1800. A decisive move above $1800, turning the 50-day moving average into support, could target the 200-day MA near $2200, implying a 25% upside. This technical view finds some support from other analysts and a double-bottom pattern on the daily chart. However, on-chain data shows significant headwinds. Exchange selling pressure has surged, with over 220K ETH moved to exchanges recently, and whale selling persists. Furthermore, U.S. spot ETH ETFs, after days of inflows, recorded a $52 million net outflow due to macro risks like U.S.-Iran tensions and bond market volatility. In summary, while technicals suggest a bullish reversal is possible if ETH sustains above $1800, sustained selling pressure and macroeconomic risks threaten to invalidate the optimistic "tactical bottom" thesis.

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Why former Bank of America strategist sees an Ethereum ‘tactical bottom’

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Injective software package hit by malicious supply chain attack – Details

In a software supply chain attack, malicious actors compromised the Injective Labs TypeScript SDK (@injectivelabs/sdk-ts v1.20.21) by uploading a tainted version to the npm registry. The attackers gained access to a legitimate contributor's GitHub account to distribute malicious commits. The compromised package, disguised as a routine update, contained malware that activated only when developers used specific wallet generation functions, stealing private keys and mnemonic seed phrases. This breach impacted approximately 50,000 weekly downloads and spread through transitive dependencies in 17 other Injective packages. While a clean version (v1.20.23) was later released, the malicious package remained accessible. Affected users are advised to rotate credentials, create new wallets, and move their funds.

ambcryptoHace 4 hora(s)

Injective software package hit by malicious supply chain attack – Details

ambcryptoHace 4 hora(s)

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ZEC

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Zcash (ZEC) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Zcash (ZEC) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Zcash (ZEC)Después de comprar tu Zcash (ZEC), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Zcash (ZEC)Tradear fácilmente con Zcash (ZEC) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

374 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ZEC (ZEC).