Blockchain Association says no to expanding stablecoin yield prohibition

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-19Actualizado a 2025-12-19

Resumen

The Blockchain Association, along with over 125 crypto industry groups, has written to the US Senate Committee on Banking opposing a proposed expansion of the ban on offering yield rewards to stablecoin holders. The letter argues that extending the prohibition—originally targeting stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act to include third-party platforms—would stifle innovation, increase market concentration, and unfairly disadvantage crypto services compared to traditional financial providers like banks and credit card companies that offer similar rewards. The Association contends that stablecoin rewards help consumers offset inflation and are a standard feature of competitive markets. It also challenges banking industry claims that yield-bearing stablecoins threaten bank lending, stating there is no evidence to support such concerns. Additionally, the letter comes as the FDIC proposes rules allowing banks to issue stablecoins through subsidiaries, subject to reserve requirements and regulatory oversight.

The Blockchain Association, a non-profit crypto advocacy organization, wrote a letter to the US Senate Committee on Banking, signed by over 125 crypto industry groups and companies, opposing the ban on third-party service providers and platforms offering customer rewards to stablecoin holders.

Expanding the prohibition on stablecoin issuers sharing yield directly with customers, outlined in the GENIUS stablecoin regulatory framework, to include third-party service providers stifles innovation and leads to “greater market concentration,” the letter said.

The letter compared the rewards offered by crypto platforms to those offered by credit card companies, banks and other traditional payment providers.

The letter opposes efforts to stop crypto platforms from sharing yield with customers. Source: The Blockchain Association

Prohibiting crypto platforms from offering similar rewards for stablecoins gives an unfair advantage to incumbent financial service providers, the Blockchain Association said.

“The potential benefits of payment stablecoins will not be realized if these types of payments cannot compete on a level playing field with other payment mechanisms. Rewards and incentives are a standard feature of competitive markets.”

The Blockchain Association has issued several statements and letters pushing back against efforts to prohibit crypto platforms from sharing yield-bearing opportunities with customers, arguing that these rewards help consumers offset inflation.

Related: Bank of Canada lays out criteria for ‘good money’ stablecoins

FDIC paves the way for banks to issue stablecoins, industry group says stables aren’t a threat

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the US regulatory agency that oversees and insures the banking sector, published a proposal on Tuesday that would allow banks to issue stablecoins through subsidiaries.

Under the proposal, both the bank and its stablecoin subsidiary would be subject to FDIC rules and assessments for financial fitness, including reserve requirements.

The FDIC proposal to allow banks to issue stablecoins. Source: FDIC

The Blockchain Association continues to push back on claims that yield-bearing stablecoins and sharing rewards with customers threaten the banking sector and bank lending.

“Evidence does not support claims that stablecoin rewards threaten community banks or lending capacity,” the Blockchain Association said, adding that it is difficult to make the case that bank lending is actually constrained by customer deposits.

Despite this, the banking industry has lobbied against yield-bearing stablecoins and crypto platforms sharing yield with clients over fears that interest offered on digital asset products will erode the market share of banks.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Blockchain Association's main argument against expanding the stablecoin yield prohibition to third-party service providers?

AThe Blockchain Association argues that expanding the prohibition to third-party service providers stifles innovation, leads to greater market concentration, and gives an unfair advantage to traditional financial service providers by preventing crypto platforms from competing on a level playing field.

QHow does the Blockchain Association compare the rewards offered by crypto platforms to those in traditional finance?

AThe letter compares the rewards offered by crypto platforms to the rewards offered by credit card companies, banks, and other traditional payment providers, stating that such incentives are a standard feature of competitive markets.

QWhat recent proposal did the FDIC make regarding banks and stablecoins?

AThe FDIC published a proposal that would allow banks to issue stablecoins through subsidiaries, with both the bank and its subsidiary being subject to FDIC rules, assessments for financial fitness, and reserve requirements.

QWhat is the banking industry's primary concern regarding yield-bearing stablecoins, according to the article?

AThe banking industry fears that the interest offered on digital asset products like yield-bearing stablecoins will erode their market share, leading them to lobby against these products and platforms sharing yield with clients.

QWhat reason does the Blockchain Association give for supporting the ability of platforms to share yield with stablecoin holders?

AThe Blockchain Association argues that these rewards help consumers offset inflation and are necessary for the potential benefits of payment stablecoins to be realized in a competitive market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片