BlackRock, Apollo, Citadel Enter the Market in the Same Week, Investing Real Money in DeFi Governance Tokens

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-25Actualizado a 2026-03-25

Resumen

In February 2026, major financial institutions including BlackRock, Apollo, and Citadel made significant moves into DeFi by directly purchasing governance tokens and integrating their products with decentralized infrastructure. Citadel invested in LayerZero’s ZRO token, BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and acquired UNI tokens, and Apollo committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho’s token supply over four years. These actions mark a shift from exploratory partnerships to tangible on-chain engagement, emphasizing economic alignment through token ownership and the use of live, revenue-generating DeFi protocols. The trend reflects growing institutional confidence in public, permissionless DeFi infrastructure, driven by proven scalability and network effects. Regulatory developments, such as the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, could further accelerate this institutional adoption of DeFi.

Author: José Sanchez & Kelvin Koh

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: In February 2026, the way traditional financial institutions entered DeFi underwent a qualitative change: no longer through strategic partnership announcements, but by directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

Within five days, Citadel bought ZRO, BlackRock bought UNI and listed BUIDL on UniswapX, Apollo committed to acquiring 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years. Spartan Group believes this is the true inflection point for the institutionalization of DeFi.

Full Text Below:

Inflection Point for DeFi Institutionalization

February 2026, within just five days, a cluster of landmark institution-crypto collaborations emerged, which we believe marks a qualitative change in how traditional finance participates in on-chain infrastructure.

Citadel Securities announced an investment in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5 billion BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's total governance token supply over four years.

Previously, the NYSE had already announced on January 19th the launch of a tokenized securities platform supporting 24/7 on-chain settlement. The pattern is clear: institutional capital is shifting from exploration to real on-chain execution—buying tokens, acquiring governance rights, routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

This wave of entry differs from previous cycles in three ways.

First, these are direct token purchases that create economic alignment, not advisory arrangements or pilot declarations.

Second, the related products are actively operating with real revenue: BUIDL manages $2.5 billion, Morpho supports over $900 million in active loans for Coinbase, LayerZero has settled over $70 billion in USDT0 cross-chain transfers.

Third, institutions chose public, permissionless protocols, not proprietary closed systems, indicating that the composability and network effects of existing DeFi infrastructure are more valuable than the control offered by custom systems.

The NYSE kicked off this show on January 19th, announcing plans to build a blockchain-based venue supporting 24/7 trading and instant on-chain settlement of tokenized stocks and ETFs, combining its Pillar matching engine with a blockchain post-trade system. Although still subject to regulatory approval and implementation details are relatively limited, this is the highest-level directional signal: the world's most iconic stock exchange is targeting on-chain settlement as core infrastructure.

LayerZero followed on February 10th with Zero, a new L1 designed for institutional-grade financial infrastructure. Citadel Securities made a strategic ZRO token purchase, significant for a firm handling about 35% of US retail stock trading.

DTCC will explore using Zero to expand its tokenization and collateral management capabilities; ICE is evaluating the chain for 24/7 trading infrastructure; Google Cloud joined to explore AI Agent micropayments; ARK Invest holds both equity and token positions, with Cathie Wood joining the advisory board.

Tether also announced a separate strategic investment in LayerZero Labs on the same day. Zero is expected to launch in Fall 2026, with three zones: a general EVM environment, a privacy-focused payments zone, and a dedicated trading zone.

Institutional interest reflects proven throughput capability. USDT0—Tether's omnichain stablecoin built on LayerZero's OFT standard—has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since January 2025.

As shown in the figure below, daily settled value accelerated sharply after USDT0's launch, transforming LayerZero from a messaging layer into critical financial infrastructure.

Figure: USDT0 has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since launch

Source: BridgeWTF

The next day, BlackRock's $2.4 billion BUIDL fund (the largest tokenized US Treasury product) was listed and made tradable on UniswapX, marking the first time a BlackRock product became accessible via decentralized exchange infrastructure.

Securitize handles compliance and whitelisting, while Wintermute, Flowdesk, and Tokka Labs compete for quotes through UniswapX's RFQ framework. BlackRock also disclosed a strategic UNI token purchase (specific terms not yet public), its first DeFi governance token on its balance sheet.

Although BUIDL's access is still limited to qualified purchasers with a minimum of $5 million, Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo stated that the infrastructure is designed to scale to retail products over time.

The decision to list on Uniswap reflects BUIDL's evolution from a niche experiment to an institutional-scale product. Since launching in March 2024 with a $40 million size, the fund peaked at nearly $2.9 billion in mid-2025 and currently has a TVL of around $2.5 billion.

Figure: BlackRock's BUIDL fund currently has a TVL of $2.5 billion

Source: Defillama

On February 13th, Apollo Global Management signed a cooperation agreement, committing to acquire up to 90 million MORPHO tokens over 48 months, approximately 9% of the total supply.

In addition to the token acquisition (valued at approximately $110 million at mid-February prices), Apollo will also collaborate to build on-chain lending markets, extending its blockchain footprint—part of its credit strategies are already tokenized via Securitize (ACRED) and Anemoy (ACRDX).

This deal is one of the most significant collaborations to date between an institution and a native DeFi protocol.

The opportunities for institutions within Morpho extend beyond token ownership. The protocol's architecture allows any entity to become a vault curator, building lending markets with customized risk parameters. Curators can earn performance fees from generated yield and management fees (capped at 5%) from AUM, creating a sustainable revenue model for institutional participants.

Perhaps the most convincing validation of the infrastructure is the CeFi-DeFi "Mohawk" model pioneered by Coinbase: retail users borrow against BTC and ETH collateral through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend, currently supporting over $900 million in active loans and $1.7 billion in collateral.

This proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled to operate behind familiar consumer interfaces, with users not needing to interact with the underlying protocol.

For Apollo, the vault curator economics, the validated distribution channel via Coinbase, and the governance influence gained through token accumulation together form a strong positioning in the on-chain credit space.

This convergence validates the design choices of permissionless, composable protocols and suggests sustained demand for governance tokens of infrastructure layer projects.

Key risks remain in execution: regulatory approval for the NYSE platform and Zero is pending, institutional token purchases may test protocol governance, and the gap between announcements and sustained on-chain activity remains significant. Nonetheless, the directional signal is unmistakable.

Figure: Morpho vault curators have generated substantial fee revenue

Source: Blockworks Research

Looking ahead, we expect these partnerships to deepen further once the CLARITY Act is passed. The Act passed the House in July 2025 by a vote of 294 to 134 and is now advancing in the Senate, where the Banking and Agriculture Committees need to reconcile their respective draft versions before a full vote.

The main point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield: the banking side is pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

July is widely seen as a key deadline before the August recess; if missed, the next window will be delayed until the fall. Once enacted, the CLARITY Act will provide the US's first comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework, clarify SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, establish a registration path for digital commodity exchanges, and provide legal certainty for tokenized products.

For protocols like Morpho and Uniswap, this will remove the regulatory ambiguity that currently constrains the scope of institutional cooperation. We believe this will unlock a second, broader wave of TradFi-crypto integration.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat significant shift in how traditional financial institutions engage with DeFi occurred in February 2026?

AThe shift was a move from strategic partnership announcements to directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure, marking a qualitative change in their participation.

QWhich three major institutions made significant moves into DeFi within a five-day period, and what did each do?

ACitadel Securities invested in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years.

QWhat are the three key differences between this wave of institutional entry into DeFi and previous cycles?

A1. They involve direct token purchases creating economic alignment, not just advisory roles or pilot announcements. 2. The involved products are actively operating with real revenue. 3. Institutions chose public, permissionless protocols over proprietary closed systems, valuing composability and network effects.

QWhat is the significance of the 'Mohawk' model pioneered by Coinbase, as mentioned in the context of Morpho?

AThe 'Mohawk' model is a CeFi-DeFi hybrid where retail users borrow against BTC and ETH through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend. It proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled behind a consumer interface.

QWhat potential future development does the article suggest could further deepen these TradFi-DeFi partnerships, and what is a key point of contention surrounding it?

AThe passage of the CLARITY Act is expected to deepen partnerships. A key point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield, with banks pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

"Anthropic Nears Trillion-Dollar IPO, Fueled by Explosive Growth and 2028 'Intelligence Explosion' Warning Anthropic is considering a deal valuing the AI company near $1 trillion, potentially leading to one of the largest IPOs ever and surpassing SpaceX. Its revenue has skyrocketed, with Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) reaching $45 billion in May 2026—a 500% increase in just five months. This vertical growth curve is attributed to its key products, Claude Code and Cowork, dominating AI coding and enterprise collaboration. Beyond commercial success, co-founder Jack Clark issued a pivotal warning in an interview: there is a greater than 50% chance that by the end of 2028, AI systems will achieve recursive self-improvement—the ability to autonomously build a 'better version' of themselves, initiating an 'intelligence explosion.' This prophecy underpins the company's astronomical valuation, as the market prices in the potential for transformative and disruptive AI. Further signaling its ambition, Anthropic formed a $1.5 billion joint venture with Goldman Sachs and Blackstone, aiming to disrupt traditional consulting firms like McKinsey by deploying Claude AI for complex strategic work. This move tests AI's capacity to replace high-level cognitive labor, a precursor to its predicted autonomous evolution. The narrative presents a dual future: unprecedented economic opportunity alongside significant risks like economic restructuring and security threats. Anthropic's meteoric rise and Clark's 2028 prediction frame the coming years as a countdown to a potential technological singularity."

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

The 2026 Q1 earnings season reveals a paradox: while AI helps companies freeze hiring and boost productivity, the soaring costs of AI inference—token consumption and GPU depreciation—are eroding savings from workforce reductions. Shopify reported that AI now writes over 50% of its code, enabling significant output with stable headcount. However, LLM costs, driven by heavy usage of its AI assistant Sidekick, are pressuring its subscription毛利率. Similarly, Roblox attributed a quarter of its full-year利润率下调 to increased AI investment. The article highlights a broader industry imbalance: combined AI capital expenditure for Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Google is projected to reach $725 billion in 2026, vastly outpacing potential savings from layoffs. For instance, Meta's planned裁员 would save about $2.4 billion annually, offsetting only ~12% of its incremental AI depreciation. While底层 model and chip suppliers like NVIDIA maintain high profitability, application-layer companies face a pricing squeeze. Their strategies now involve要么 tightly linking AI costs to user engagement (like Shopify) or introducing fees for advanced AI features (like Roblox), as covering AI bills with裁员 savings alone is financially unsustainable.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros