Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capitals Frenziedly Betting on New Public Blockchains? The Answer Lies in These Three Points

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-14Actualizado a 2026-05-14

Resumen

Recently, a wave of major funding announcements for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo signals a significant industry shift. This article analyzes the driving forces behind this surge. Firstly, regulatory clarity is a key catalyst. These massive investments, including Circle's Arc ($222M), Digital Asset's Canton ($300M), and Stripe's Tempo ($500M), all followed the US passage of the *Genius Act* in July 2025. This suggests that clear legislation is unlocking institutional capital. The anticipated, broader *Clarity Act* could further accelerate growth, particularly in tokenization and compliant infrastructure. Secondly, built-in privacy is emerging as a critical design feature. Unlike Ethereum or Solana, these new chains natively support confidential transactions. This directly addresses real-world business needs, where public transparency can be a liability for corporate dealings or personal salary data, making privacy a potential killer application. Finally, the entry of traditional giants marks a new competitive phase. These projects are backed by major firms: Arc by Circle, Canton by a consortium including Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq, and Tempo by Stripe with partners like Visa. While crypto-native projects remain strong contenders, this institutional involvement brings substantial capital, execution capability, and operational rigor. In conclusion, the convergence of regulatory progress, demand for privacy, and competition from established financial and t...

Industry news often emerges in clusters. Such moments deserve high attention, as a major trend is undoubtedly unfolding behind them.

Just this Monday, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that its new blockchain project, Arc, completed a $222 million funding round, reaching an overall valuation of $3 billion. The investor lineup is impressive, including top-tier institutions like BlackRock, Apollo Funds, and the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, among others.

Just the day before, news emerged about another emerging blockchain, Canton Network, developed by Digital Asset: led by a16z, it raised $300 million at a valuation of $2 billion.

Similarly, Stripe's blockchain, Tempo, has been leading the track: it completed a $500 million funding round at the end of last year, reaching a valuation of $5 billion, and later announced strategic partnerships with companies like DoorDash and Visa.

Arc, Canton, and Tempo are all public blockchains tailored for stablecoin and asset tokenization scenarios. This wave of concentrated funding activity has led me to summarize three crucial insights for the crypto industry.

Capital Always Follows Regulatory Legislation

These several hundred-million-dollar funding rounds all occurred after the US Congress passed the 'Genius Act' in July 2025.

I have always believed that before the act's passage, the sluggish and slow progress of US crypto legislation directly dampened industry investment enthusiasm; major institutions were unwilling to rashly deploy capital or build blockchain infrastructure amid unclear regulatory prospects. Now, with regulation clarified, the industry landscape is changing.

No one can be sure whether these projects could maintain their current valuations or secure such large funding rounds without the protection of the 'Genius Act,' but it is certain that regulatory clarity has played a key facilitating role.

For investors, the most thought-provoking question is: If the comprehensive market structure bill for the crypto industry, the 'Clarity Act,' successfully passes Congress, how much industry opportunity will it unlock?

The coverage breadth of the 'Clarity Act' far exceeds that of the 'Genius Act,' and the final text of the bill is not yet set, making it impossible to precisely predict its impact scope at this time. However, it is certain that the asset tokenization track and compliant financial infrastructure will be the biggest beneficiaries. I also hope the final version of the bill will simultaneously benefit decentralized finance, innovative token design, and other areas, but specifics will depend on the official text. The 'Clarity Act' deserves everyone's continuous tracking.

Privacy Protection May Become a Phenomenal Core Application

Arc, Canton, and Tempo share a common feature, which is also their biggest distinction from Ethereum and Solana: all three blockchains natively have private transaction functionality built-in.

As crypto assets gradually integrate into mainstream commercial scenarios, this design logic fits real-world needs very well. The public transparency of a public blockchain, originally the cornerstone of trust-building, can become a shortcoming in commercial settings.

Businesses do not want every pending transaction to be publicly visible, and professionals do not want their salary details to be easily queryable by anyone via a block explorer. In these cases, public transparency is no longer an advantage but a real pain point.

Even the staunchest supporters of blockchain transparency must admit: the business world inherently requires a degree of privacy and confidentiality of information. These three emerging blockchains have pre-embedded privacy features at the foundational design level, accurately addressing the genuine needs of traditional institutions. The recent rounds of high-value funding confirm: the direction of this track is completely correct.

Traditional Giants Officially Enter the Race

The most special aspect of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their backing by top-tier enterprises and financial institutions.

· Arc is led and developed by the publicly-traded company Circle;

· Canton's backers include Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, Virtu, among others;

· Tempo is jointly built by payment giant Stripe and crypto VC Paradigm, with companies like Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI participating in the project's architecture design.

In contrast, the older generation of blockchains is quite different: Ethereum was initiated by a 19-year-old dropout on a Bitcoin forum, and Solana was conceived from a moment of inspiration by a Qualcomm engineer.

Of course, this does not mean traditional giants are guaranteed to win. Personally, I remain more bullish on crypto-native projects in the long term. However, it is undeniable that the entry of banks and large tech corporations brings more substantial capital, stronger execution capabilities for real-world implementation, and more professional, standardized operations to the industry.

Competition fosters growth. I believe that through the bidirectional competition between giants and native projects, the innovation speed and developmental boundaries of the entire crypto industry will be further expanded.

After all, steel sharpens steel; competition and cooperation give rise to progress.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent surge in large-scale funding for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo according to the article?

AThe recent surge in large-scale funding is primarily attributed to the clarification of U.S. regulatory landscape, specifically following the passage of the *Genius Act* by the U.S. Congress in July 2025, which reduced regulatory uncertainty and boosted investor confidence.

QWhat is a key technological design feature that distinguishes Arc, Canton, and Tempo from established chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AA key distinguishing feature of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their native, built-in private transaction functionality, addressing the privacy needs of mainstream business applications where public transparency can be a disadvantage.

QWhich traditional financial and corporate giants are mentioned as being involved in the development or backing of the new public blockchains discussed?

AThe article mentions involvement from major traditional institutions: Arc is led by Circle; Canton's backers include Goldman Sachs, Citadel, DTCC, Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu; Tempo is built by Stripe and Paradigm, with design input from Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI.

QWhat potential future legislation does the article suggest could unlock even greater opportunities for the crypto industry, and in which areas?

AThe article suggests the potential passage of the broader *Clarity Act* could unlock significant opportunities, particularly in the areas of asset tokenization and compliant financial infrastructure, possibly also benefiting decentralized finance (DeFi) and innovative token design.

QHow does the article contrast the origins of new chains like Arc, Canton, Tempo with those of older chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AThe article contrasts their origins by noting that Arc, Canton, and Tempo are backed by established corporations and financial giants, whereas Ethereum was founded by a teenager on a Bitcoin forum and Solana was conceived by a former Qualcomm engineer, highlighting a shift from crypto-native origins to institutional involvement.

Lecturas Relacionadas

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 26 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 26 min(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片