BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-13Actualizado a 2026-01-13

Resumen

Crypto custody firm BitGo is targeting a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming U.S. IPO, planning to raise $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares priced between $15 and $17. Despite a volatile market environment and recent selloffs, BitGo aims to leverage positive momentum in early 2026. The company, which secured a national trust charter from the OCC, has enlisted Goldman Sachs and Citigroup as lead managers for the offering. It plans to list on the NYSE under the ticker "BTGO," joining other major crypto firms entering public markets.

Crypto custody firm BitGo announced on Monday that it aims for a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming initial public offering (IPO) in the United States, amid major interest by these firms to trade in public markets.

As reported by Reuters, the crypto company plans to raise as much as $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares, with prices expected to range from $15 to $17 per share.

Investing Climate Remains Shaky

Established in 2013, BitGo has emerged as one of the largest crypto custody firms in the United States, specializing in the secure storage and protection of digital assets. This role has become increasingly important amid rising institutional interest in cryptocurrencies.

Following a strong showing for other major crypto firms in 2025, including successful market debuts from stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL) and cryptocurrency exchange Bullish (BLSH), BitGo is entering a competitive landscape. Crypto exchange Kraken is also looking to go public.

However, recent market volatility, particularly the sharp selloff in October of last year, whipping out nearly $20 billion in long positions, has created challenges for companies looking to attract investors. Additionally, ongoing pressure on technology and artificial intelligence (AI) valuations has heightened scrutiny across risk assets.

According to Lukas Muehlbauer, an IPOX research analyst, this shift has led to a “flight to quality,” favoring established and regulated companies like BitGo over more speculative ventures.

BitGo Targets IPO Success

Despite the challenges, BitGo aims to leverage positive market momentum in early 2026, when outperformance by small and mid-cap indices could provide a favorable environment for mid-sized offerings.

The firm has enlisted Goldman Sachs as the lead book-running manager for the IPO, with Citigroup also serving as a book-running manager. Other financial institutions in the offering include Deutsche Bank Securities, Mizuho, Wells Fargo Securities, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Canaccord Genuity, and Cantor.

Clear Street, Compass Point, Craig-Hallum, Rosenblatt, Wedbush Securities, and SoFi will act as co-managers. BitGo plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BTGO.”

Notably, the company is one of five crypto firms, alongside Ripple, Circle, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos Trust Company, to receive national trust charter applications approved by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in December of last year.

This national trust bank charter would empower BitGo to manage and hold assets for its customers, enabling faster payment settlements—a move that could bolster the firm’s competitive edge in the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency and digital finance.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap recovery and subsequent consolidation above the $3 trillion mark. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the target valuation and how much does BitGo aim to raise in its upcoming IPO?

ABitGo aims for a valuation of up to $1.96 billion and plans to raise as much as $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares at a price range of $15 to $17 per share.

QWhat is BitGo's primary business and why has its role become increasingly important?

ABitGo is a crypto custody firm that specializes in the secure storage and protection of digital assets. Its role has become increasingly important due to rising institutional interest in cryptocurrencies.

QWhich major financial institutions are leading BitGo's IPO process?

AGoldman Sachs is the lead book-running manager for the IPO, with Citigroup also serving as a book-running manager. Other institutions involved include Deutsche Bank Securities, Mizuho, Wells Fargo Securities, and several others.

QWhat significant regulatory approval did BitGo receive recently and what does it allow the company to do?

AIn December of last year, BitGo was one of five crypto firms to have its national trust charter application approved by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). This charter empowers BitGo to manage and hold assets for its customers and enables faster payment settlements.

QOn which stock exchange and under what ticker symbol does BitGo plan to list its shares?

ABitGo plans to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol 'BTGO'.

Lecturas Relacionadas

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

Authors: Dave Mazza, Thomas DiFazio | Source: Deep Tide TechFlow The article, written by Roundhill Investments (issuer of the DRAM ETF), responds to Morningstar's caution about investing in memory chip stocks. Morningstar warns of the sector's history of boom-bust cycles, a lack of economic moats, and potential momentum-driven overvaluation. Roundhill argues the current situation is structurally different due to AI. Key points in Roundhill's rebuttal include: * **Changed Demand & Supply Dynamics:** AI infrastructure, not consumer electronics, is now the primary growth driver for memory demand. New, strict long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers reflect the high capital intensity of advanced manufacturing. * **Existence of a Moat:** High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI, has extremely high manufacturing barriers. The market is dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, with new entrants blocked by technological complexity and long lead times for equipment like ASML's EUV machines. * **Strong Fundamental Outlook:** Analyst consensus projects the three companies will rank among the world's most profitable by 2027, with combined profits of $704 billion on over $1 trillion in revenue. Their operating margins have already reached record highs. * **Valuation Re-rating:** Despite significant stock price gains, memory stocks trade at attractive valuations (e.g., a median NTM P/E of 8.37x for the DRAM ETF) relative to projected explosive EPS growth. Roundhill suggests historical valuation frameworks may no longer apply given the new profitability paradigm. Conclusion: Roundhill contends the rally is justified by fundamentals, marking a structural shift for the memory industry into a new era of sustained, AI-driven demand against constrained supply, rather than a repeat of past cycles.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报Hace 54 min(s)

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报Hace 54 min(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: Why the Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Stagnate at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb analyzes AI service pricing, particularly Anthropic's model, as a form of "tax policy" on AI labor. He observes a stark contrast: small companies (under ~150 users) benefit from low or zero marginal cost via flat-rate subscriptions, incentivizing them to maximize AI usage ("tokenmaxxing"). In contrast, large enterprises pay per-token API costs with high (e.g., 75%) markups, creating a disincentive for experimental or marginal automation. This pricing cliff at 150 users acts like a regulatory notch, potentially causing the fastest-growing AI-native companies to artificially cap their headcount to retain subsidized rates. Consequently, large-scale direct AI-for-human substitution within big corporations may not happen as expected; instead, job displacement may occur indirectly as lean, AI-heavy startups outcompete and erode their market share. The article concludes that token pricing, though not designed as such, functions as a powerful de facto tax policy shaping company structure and automation incentives.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: Why the Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Stagnate at 149 Employees

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros