Bitcoin Fork ECX, Created by Paul Sztorc, Surpasses 25,000 Blocks in Just 13 Hours

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-23Actualizado a 2026-08-23

Resumen

The ECX Bitcoin fork, created by Drivechain developer Paul Sztorc, launched its alpha phase at Bitcoin block height 963,648. Remarkably, the network surpassed 25,000 blocks in just 13 hours due to its initial difficulty being set to 1, mirroring Bitcoin's 2009 launch. By Sunday morning, August 23, the difficulty had already skyrocketed to 16.78 million after several adjustments, with miners contributing a hashrate of 3.53 PH/s to the chain. This level of support from multiple mining pools starkly contrasts with the failed BIP-110 event earlier in the month, which lacked miner backing. While ECX has attracted real mining power and has a small number of wallets, the ecash (ECX) token currently has no established market value and is not yet listed on exchanges. Its economic viability will face a significant test after the initial mining surge subsides and block rewards diminish, especially during the long wait until the network's final phase is scheduled for launch on October 31, 2026. The early activity demonstrates technical feasibility, but sustained growth will depend on whether it can maintain miner interest and attract listings from wallets and exchanges in the absence of a tradable price.

The latest Bitcoin fork has begun its alpha phase: the ECX network, created by Paul Sztorc, the developer of Drivechain, launched at block height 963,648. As of 9 a.m. on Sunday, August 23rd, the new network had already processed over 25,000 blocks in just 13 hours. The intervals between blocks were incredibly short, as the network's difficulty started at 1—exactly like Bitcoin did at its launch in 2009.

As of 9 a.m. Eastern Time (EDT), after a series of difficulty adjustments every 2,016 blocks, ECX's difficulty soared to 16.78 million. According to current data, miners are processing 3.53 petahashes per second (PH/s) on the ECX chain. If every miner used the original Bitmain Antminer S19 model (not Pro), which provides 95 terahashes per second (TH/s), this would correspond to nearly 36 Antminer S19 units working on Sztorc's fork.

Image source: Explorer.alpha.ecash.ninja/mining at 9:00 AM EDT, August 23, 2026. The alpha snapshot was taken at Bitcoin block ~963,648 (August 22nd). Test coins can later be burned in exchange for a stake in the permanent ECX, which is scheduled to launch on the mainnet around October 31st. The difficulty will continue to rise as new hashpower joins, so now is the perfect time.

But miners can obviously deploy almost any old Antminer, including the vintage S9, along with brands like Sealminers, Whatsminers, Bitaxes, Nerdaxes, or even the weakest hash-rate machines, to earn Alpha rewards. What immediately distinguishes this fork from the failed BIP-110 fiasco earlier this month is mining support. ECX is clearly attracting more miners willing to support the chain with real hashpower.

Miners Direct Real Hashpower to Sztorc's Fork

The 3.53 PH/s hashpower is distributed among several pools, with Ecashpool-alpha leading. The remaining share consists of Kikko, L2L Pool, Nurserypool, Ckpool, Solo, Guilastuce, BIP300.xyz, Layertree, and Avonpool. Since the ECX network's difficulty is still low, blocks are being generated at a rate that makes Bitcoin's regular ten-minute intervals seem glacial in comparison. But although ECX already has miners and a small number of wallets, the ecash (ECX) crypto asset still has no established market value.

Mining pools directing SHA-256 hashpower to the ECX blockchain, as of 9:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on Sunday, August 23, 2026. Image source: Explorer.alpha.ecash.ninja/mining.

ECX is not yet listed on cryptocurrency exchanges, resulting in no defined price or real trading venue, and the situation may not change until the third and final phase of the network's development, timed for the 18th anniversary of the Bitcoin whitepaper's publication—October 31, 2026. Nevertheless, comparing Sztorc's fork with the BIP-110 event reveals a stark contrast: the former has tangible miner support, while the latter simply lacked it.

ECX Faces Its Biggest Test After the 'Mining Surge'

Nonetheless, the initial surge proves technical viability, not economic sustainability. Once the difficulty stabilizes and the block reward decreases, miner enthusiasm could evaporate in the absence of a tradable price. The long wait until October 2026 is a grave for growth dynamics, as hype quickly fades. On the other hand, this early surge could signal genuine support, growth dynamics could intensify, and infrastructure providers such as wallets and centralized crypto exchanges might see sufficient activity to begin listing ECX.

Time will tell.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho created the ECX Bitcoin fork and what is their primary project known for?

AThe ECX Bitcoin fork was created by Paul Sztorc, who is known as the developer of Drivechain.

QHow quickly did the ECX network mine its first 25,000 blocks, and what was the starting difficulty?

AThe ECX network mined over 25,000 blocks in just 13 hours. Its starting difficulty was 1, the same as Bitcoin's at launch in 2009.

QWhat current hashrate is being processed on the ECX chain, and how does that translate to a specific miner model?

AMiners are processing 3.53 petahashes per second (PH/s) on the ECX chain. Using the original Bitmain Antminer S19 (95 TH/s) as a benchmark, this is equivalent to nearly 36 such miners working on Sztorc's fork.

QHow does the article contrast the initial support for the ECX fork with the earlier BIP-110 event?

AThe article highlights a sharp contrast: the ECX fork has tangible mining support with real hashrate directed to it, while the BIP-110 event simply lacked such support.

QAccording to the article, what is the most significant upcoming challenge for the ECX fork after the initial mining surge?

AThe most significant upcoming challenge is the wait until its mainnet launch, scheduled for around October 31, 2026. The article suggests the long wait could dampen growth dynamics as hype fades, testing the project's economic sustainability once block rewards decrease and without an established market price.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

Anthropic has been discovered working on two new, previously unknown models codenamed "Marshmallow" (claude-marshmallow-eap) and "Melon" (claude-melon-eap), with early tests showing Marshmallow potentially surpassing Claude Opus 5 in conversational naturalness. Their emergence coincides with surprising new data revealing that Anthropic's flagship Fable 5 model, released two months ago as its strongest and most expensive offering, is being largely ignored by the enterprise market. According to spending data from Ramp tracking over 70,000 US companies, Fable 5 accounts for only about 11% of total token spending on Anthropic's models. This pales in comparison to OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 Sol, which commands roughly 25% of token spending in the same period. The tepid adoption is largely attributed to Fable 5's extremely high cost—double that of Opus 4.8 and ten times that of Haiku 4.5—without delivering proportionally superior performance for most business applications. Compounding the issue, the later-released Claude Opus 5, priced at half the cost of Fable 5, has achieved comparable or even better results in key benchmarks like programming and knowledge work, quickly surpassing Fable 5 in enterprise spending share. Furthermore, the rapid rise of powerful, low-cost open-source models—whose token usage share surged from 11% in April to 62% in August while costing less than 4% of enterprise AI budgets—applies additional pressure. Analysts suggest the sudden appearance of Marshmallow and Melon may be an urgent move by Anthropic to address this gap in its lineup. The goal is to offer models that are not only powerful but also cost-effective enough for businesses to adopt widely and sustainably, moving beyond a flagship that serves more as a showcase than a workhorse.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

Three months after the passing of his dog Rosie, AI entrepreneur Paul S. Conyngham secured $4 million in seed funding from Founders Fund for his new startup, Gamgee. The company aims to industrialize the experimental, AI-assisted process he pioneered to create a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for Rosie, who suffered from mast cell tumors. With no formal biology background, Conyngham used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to analyze Rosie's tumor DNA, identify target neoantigens, and design a custom mRNA vaccine sequence. Laboratory partners at UNSW produced the vaccine. Initial treatment showed tumor reduction, but Rosie's cancer later recurred and she was euthanized. Gamgee's goal is to streamline this "N-of-1" approach into a repeatable service for canine cancer patients, handling sequencing, vaccine design, production, and delivery. Clinical trials are planned in Australia in collaboration with research institutions. The company also eyes a longer-term vision of establishing personalized, mRNA-based medicine across species. The story highlights the broader challenge in personalized cancer treatment: compressing the entire timeline from design and regulatory approval to manufacturing and administration to match the patient's prognosis. While AI can accelerate target discovery, the remaining logistical and regulatory hurdles are significant. The article concludes by emphasizing that, for now, consulting qualified veterinary oncologists remains the responsible path for pet owners.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片