Bearish Alert for Stellar: Will the Bears Drag XLM Into Deeper Fiery Red?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2025-12-11Actualizado a 2025-12-11

Resumen

Stellar (XLM) has declined by 4.04% in the past 24 hours, trading at $0.2405 amid a fearful market sentiment. Despite the drop, the TD Sequential indicator is signaling a potential buy opportunity in the same zone that previously triggered a 95% rally. However, technical indicators suggest bearish pressure may persist. The MACD shows weakening bullish momentum, while the CMF at -0.14 indicates capital outflows. The RSI at 41.46 reflects neutral-to-bearish sentiment, and the Bull Bear Power remains slightly negative. Key support lies at $0.2397, with resistance near $0.2413. A breakdown could lead to further declines, while a rebound might initiate upward movement above $0.2421.

The crypto market’s volatile nature has resulted in displaying both bear and bull signals alternative day. This back and forth flip makes it hard to predict the price action. With the Fear and Greed Index value holding at 29, fear sentiment is lingering across the assets, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), trading on the downside.

Meanwhile, Stellar (XLM) has registered a 4.04% drop in value over the last 24 hours. In the morning hours, the asset traded at a high range of $0.2594. The bearish pressure in the XLM market triggered the price to plunge to a bottom level of $0.2397. Currently, Stellar traded at $0.2405, with the daily trading volume reaching $191.66 million.

Furthermore, an analyst chart shows that the TD Sequential indicator is flashing another buy signal for Stellar at the same price zone where it previously triggered one. The last time this signal appeared in this area, XLM rallied nearly 95%, suggesting that this setup might hint at a similar potential rebound, if market conditions align.

Is a Breakout Ahead, or Is More Bearish Pressure Coming for Stellar?

The current trading pattern of Stellar reveals the bearish pressure, and the price could move down to the key support at around $0.2397. With the downside correction strengthening, the asset might trigger the death cross to take place. Eventually, the bears drive down the price below $0.2389.

Upon a bullish reversal, the XLM price may immediately rise and find the resistance at the $0.2413 range. Assuming the correction on the upside continues, the asset could push for the emergence of the death cross. The bulls would initiate a steady price movement on the upside, above the $0.2421 mark.

Stellar’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line is found below the signal line, which indicates weakening bullish momentum. The buyers are losing strength, and the sellers may gain control. Also, this bearish signal may hint at continued downward movement.

Additionally, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator of XLM is at -0.14, suggesting mild bearish pressure in the market. This negative value infers that the capital is flowing out of the asset. The current momentum is not extremely bearish, but it has weak demand and reduced accumulation.

Stellar’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) settled at 41.46, implying its neutral-to-slightly bearish sentiment, weakened momentum. The asset is not oversold, but the selling pressure is stronger than buying interest. Moreover, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of XLM at -0.0025 is slightly negative, with the bears in control. As the value is near zero, the asset has a mild bearish sentiment in the market.

Top Updated Crypto News

OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Takes a Hit: Can It Hold Its Ground or Test Lower Lows?

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 37 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar RED

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar RedStone (RED) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar RedStone (RED) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu RedStone (RED)Después de comprar tu RedStone (RED), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear RedStone (RED)Tradear fácilmente con RedStone (RED) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

411 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.03.05Actualizado en 2026.07.21

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de RED (RED).