Axie Infinity up 14% – AXS faces decisive $2 test next

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-20Actualizado a 2026-01-20

Resumen

Axie Infinity (AXS) leads gaming tokens with a 14% daily gain, continuing the bullish momentum from the previous week. However, the broader gaming sector shows mixed performance, with only SAND and MANA also posting gains among the top 10 tokens. AXS faces a critical resistance test at the $2 level after breaking out from a consolidation phase below $1. Technical indicators like the MACD show weakening bearish pressure, while the On Balance Volume suggests strong buying interest. On-chain data reveals mixed sentiment, with some addresses depositing (potentially profit-taking) and others withdrawing (indicating bullish belief). A sharp decline in holders could challenge further upside, but a break above $2 remains possible if bullish momentum continues.

Gaming tokens were still maintaining the bullish momentum that started as the previous week came to a close. However, most of them have not sustained this trend in the past 24 hours.

Axie Infinity is leading all the top-capped tokens with double-digit gains of 14%. This rally was within the 113% range of last week.

Only three of them have managed positive returns among the top 10 in terms of capitalization. The Sandbox [SAND] and Decentraland [MANA] recorded 6% and 5%, respectively, while the others were in red.

The rally follows capital rotation into gaming tokens. They have been the strongest sector among all altcoins over the past week. Will AXS bulls sustain the trend?

AXS bears testing bulls’ strength

The chart showed that AXS was in an uptrend after breaking out of the sideways consolidation below $1. The breakout was followed by a surge that was paused around the higher high of $2.

The pause came as bears kicked in. As such, the MACD was red, though the strength was diminishing after bulls countered the pullback.

This signal showed sellers were being taken out gradually after recovery was initiated at $1.6.

Meanwhile, the On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million explained what drove the recovery. However, bulls needed to beat bears at the $2 zone, which was the decision area for the next move.

Transactions show mixed signals

The network activity on Etherscan showed that there were over 2,600 transactions on the day. This indicated why AXS had outperformed its peers during the day.

However, this on-chain activity was mixed in sentiment despite the gauge being 84% bullish and 16% bearish. There were addresses that were withdrawing from exchanges, and at the same time, there were those depositing.

For instance, a wallet deposited over $40K AXS to Bybit. Another wallet withdrew $16.9K worth of AXS from Binance.

Furthermore, there was inter-exchange token movement. For instance, Coinbase moved $5K to Binance, while OKX moved $1.3K to the Gate.io exchange.

The withdrawing addresses showed belief in a continued uptrend, while those depositing were potentially taking profit. The balance in the two activities showed there was no consensus in direction bias.

Axie Infinity holders dip sharply

The number of Axie Infinity holders dropped sharply, with over 1.5K lost in a week, at 166.72K at press time. This meant that they were taking profit from the aforementioned rally.

Such an outcome could derail Axie Infinity’s potential to break past $2. However, if bulls beat bears and gaming tokens continue thriving, AXS may breach $2.

Final Thoughts

AXS rallies 14%, leading all the gaming tokens in terms of daily gains.
AXS price faces a key test at $2, with holders declining sharply.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price movement of Axie Infinity (AXS) and what key level is it testing?

AAxie Infinity (AXS) is up 14% and is currently testing the key resistance level of $2.

QWhich other gaming tokens, besides AXS, recorded positive returns among the top 10 by market cap?

ABesides AXS, The Sandbox (SAND) recorded a 6% gain and Decentraland (MANA) recorded a 5% gain.

QWhat on-chain metric, with a value of over $90 million, is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery?

AThe On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery.

QWhat does the sharp decline in the number of Axie Infinity holders suggest about investor behavior?

AThe sharp decline of over 1,500 holders suggests that investors are taking profits from the recent price rally.

QAccording to the network activity on Etherscan, what was the mixed sentiment among AXS traders?

AThe mixed sentiment was shown by some addresses depositing AXS to exchanges to take profits, while others were withdrawing AXS from exchanges, indicating a belief in a continued uptrend.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros