Axie Infinity – Here’s what traders should bet on after AXS’s 39% hike

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-18Actualizado a 2026-01-18

Resumen

Axie Infinity's native token (AXS) has surged 39% in 24 hours and 93% year-to-date, significantly outperforming other gaming tokens. Its trading volume spiked over 190% to $326 million, indicating strong market interest. Despite the bullish momentum, AXS remains within a long-term descending channel. A decisive breakout above the $1.50 resistance could trigger a 200% rally toward $4.70. However, failure to break out may lead to a continuation of the downtrend. Liquidity clusters are concentrated around $1.30-$1.60, acting as a price magnet. Recent tokenomics changes, including a 90% reduction in daily token emissions, may create a supply crunch. Increased demand is also evident as the community voted to stake 9 million ETH from its treasury, signaling strong long-term confidence. The key level to watch is $1.50 for a potential major breakout or rejection.

At the time of writing, Axie Infinity had outpaced its fellow gaming tokens with gains of 39% over the last 24 hours. In fact, the altcoin has seen over 50% gains this week alone, having appreciated by 93% since the year started.

During this rally, AXS had the highest trading volume in the sector after three consecutive days of $100 million. The daily trading volume spiked by more than 190%, climbing to $326 million according to CoinMarketCap.

This is evidence of AXS’s dominance over other gaming tokens. However, despite the altcoin’s bullish strength since the start of the year, it remains trapped within a massive downward channel. Hence, the question – Is a breakout on the way?

AXS eyes multi-month channel breakout

A look at AXS’s daily chart revealed that the altcoin was approaching the upper resistance of a multi-month descending channel. This downtrend saw AXS hit a four-year low in December, before bulls returned and ignited the ongoing price trajectory.

With the Web3 gaming sector back in the midst of traders, bulls could push the price past the descending trendline resistance. A break and hold above $1.50 could see it rally by more than 200% – To around $4.70.

Worth noting, however, that the market bears could also retaliate, preventing bulls from higher advances. If that happens, the anticipated trend reversal would be ruled out and possibly, the price would extend its current trend.

Price sandwiched between liquidity clusters

The liquidity clusters were concentrated above $1.30 to $1.60, as per data from CoinGlass. AXS’s price rallied as it absorbed liquidity that was sitting above it on the charts.

At press time, most of the clusters were concentrated above $1.50. However, there were some that semed to be forming below this level too. This suggested that both bulls and bears remain interested in the altcoin.

The altcoin’s sustained price spike was a result of a short squeeze that cleared sell orders that were forming above the price. That implited there may be a risk of a retracement that would trigger the orders sitting below $1.50. Especially since liquidity acts as a price magnet.

Is a supply crunch in sight?

Now, AXS has slashed its circulating token supply after disabling Smooth Love Potion (SLP) rewards in Origin mode. This has reduced the daily emissions by about 90%, heightening the chances of a supply crunch.

On the demand side, the community underlined its confidence in AXS after voting for its treasury to stake 9 million Ethereum (ETH). This can be interpreted as institutional-grade execution reinforcing the long-term vision of the gaming token.

If the token supply remains reduced and the community’s demand increases, genuine buyers could easily drive up the altcoin’s price.


Final Thoughts

  • AXS has rallied by 93% since the start of the year, outpacing all other Web3 gaming tokens.
  • Axie Infinity now faces a crucial test around the $1.50-level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片