Axie Infinity – Here’s what traders should bet on after AXS’s 39% hike

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-18Actualizado a 2026-01-18

Resumen

Axie Infinity's native token (AXS) has surged 39% in 24 hours and 93% year-to-date, significantly outperforming other gaming tokens. Its trading volume spiked over 190% to $326 million, indicating strong market interest. Despite the bullish momentum, AXS remains within a long-term descending channel. A decisive breakout above the $1.50 resistance could trigger a 200% rally toward $4.70. However, failure to break out may lead to a continuation of the downtrend. Liquidity clusters are concentrated around $1.30-$1.60, acting as a price magnet. Recent tokenomics changes, including a 90% reduction in daily token emissions, may create a supply crunch. Increased demand is also evident as the community voted to stake 9 million ETH from its treasury, signaling strong long-term confidence. The key level to watch is $1.50 for a potential major breakout or rejection.

At the time of writing, Axie Infinity had outpaced its fellow gaming tokens with gains of 39% over the last 24 hours. In fact, the altcoin has seen over 50% gains this week alone, having appreciated by 93% since the year started.

During this rally, AXS had the highest trading volume in the sector after three consecutive days of $100 million. The daily trading volume spiked by more than 190%, climbing to $326 million according to CoinMarketCap.

This is evidence of AXS’s dominance over other gaming tokens. However, despite the altcoin’s bullish strength since the start of the year, it remains trapped within a massive downward channel. Hence, the question – Is a breakout on the way?

AXS eyes multi-month channel breakout

A look at AXS’s daily chart revealed that the altcoin was approaching the upper resistance of a multi-month descending channel. This downtrend saw AXS hit a four-year low in December, before bulls returned and ignited the ongoing price trajectory.

With the Web3 gaming sector back in the midst of traders, bulls could push the price past the descending trendline resistance. A break and hold above $1.50 could see it rally by more than 200% – To around $4.70.

Worth noting, however, that the market bears could also retaliate, preventing bulls from higher advances. If that happens, the anticipated trend reversal would be ruled out and possibly, the price would extend its current trend.

Price sandwiched between liquidity clusters

The liquidity clusters were concentrated above $1.30 to $1.60, as per data from CoinGlass. AXS’s price rallied as it absorbed liquidity that was sitting above it on the charts.

At press time, most of the clusters were concentrated above $1.50. However, there were some that semed to be forming below this level too. This suggested that both bulls and bears remain interested in the altcoin.

The altcoin’s sustained price spike was a result of a short squeeze that cleared sell orders that were forming above the price. That implited there may be a risk of a retracement that would trigger the orders sitting below $1.50. Especially since liquidity acts as a price magnet.

Is a supply crunch in sight?

Now, AXS has slashed its circulating token supply after disabling Smooth Love Potion (SLP) rewards in Origin mode. This has reduced the daily emissions by about 90%, heightening the chances of a supply crunch.

On the demand side, the community underlined its confidence in AXS after voting for its treasury to stake 9 million Ethereum (ETH). This can be interpreted as institutional-grade execution reinforcing the long-term vision of the gaming token.

If the token supply remains reduced and the community’s demand increases, genuine buyers could easily drive up the altcoin’s price.

Final Thoughts

  • AXS has rallied by 93% since the start of the year, outpacing all other Web3 gaming tokens.
  • Axie Infinity now faces a crucial test around the $1.50-level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片