Australian Senate Committee Backs Major Crypto Regulation Bill

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-16Actualizado a 2026-03-16

Resumen

An Australian Senate committee has endorsed a significant crypto regulatory bill, the Corporations Amendment Bill 2025, which mandates that digital asset platforms obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence. The bill aims to enhance consumer protection by regulating intermediaries that hold customer assets or facilitate trading, rather than the underlying blockchain technology. It introduces clear definitions for digital tokens and applies existing financial services laws to crypto platforms, including rules for asset custody, transaction execution, and disclosure. The legislation, widely supported by industry groups, is part of Australia's broader effort to establish a comprehensive, technology-neutral regulatory framework aligned with international standards.

An Australian Senate committee has suggested passing a prominent crypto regulatory bill that would need financial licences for crypto platforms.

The report released on March 16 mentioned that the Senate Economics Legislation Committee said the Corporations Amendment Bill 2025 would depict a substantial enhancement in the regulation of digital assets in Australia.

The committee also highlighted that developing rules which are able to accurately recognise and control risk while being technology-neutral and compatible with international frameworks is a significantly difficult undertaking but deduced that the bill offers meaningfully robust safeguards for Australian consumers.

The legislation is part of Australia’s wider push to set up a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto services. As per the proposal, businesses running digital asset platforms or tokenized custody platforms would be given similar treatment to other financial service providers and need to get an Australian Financial Services Licence, as per an official bill digest.

Instead of regulating the underlying blockchain technology, the bill aims at intermediaries that hold customer assets or facilitate trading, which regulators see as the prime source of potential risk in the ecosystem.

The bill also clarified prominent concepts like “digital tokens” and defined how current financial services laws apply to crypto platforms and rolled out rules governing asset custody, transaction execution, and disclosure needs for retail clients.

The Warm Welcome

The framework would also set up standards for safeguarding customer assets. Rolled out by the Treasury in November 2025, the bill passed its third reading in the House of Representatives on Feb. 4 before being referred to the Senate the next day.

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee has since looked after the bill as well as the industry feedback and released its report on March 16.

The committee also mentioned that the industry submissions warmly and widely welcomed the efforts of the government to modernise the regulatory framework of the country and make clearer rules for market participants.

The inquiry of the committee got submissions from a range of industry groups, comprising exchanges, fintech associations and law companies.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

KuCoin has Launched Skills Hub, Advancement for AI Agent

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the Australian crypto regulatory bill discussed in the article?

AThe bill aims to require financial licenses for crypto platforms, treating them similarly to other financial service providers and establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in Australia.

QWhich Australian legislative body has backed the crypto regulation bill and when was their report released?

AThe Senate Economics Legislation Committee backed the bill and released its report on March 16.

QWhat specific aspects of crypto platforms does the bill focus on regulating?

AThe bill focuses on regulating intermediaries that hold customer assets or facilitate trading, rather than the underlying blockchain technology, and it covers asset custody, transaction execution, and disclosure requirements for retail clients.

QHow did industry groups respond to the proposed crypto regulatory framework according to the committee?

AIndustry submissions warmly and widely welcomed the government's efforts to modernize the regulatory framework and create clearer rules for market participants.

QWhat key definitions does the bill provide regarding digital assets?

AThe bill clarifies concepts like 'digital tokens' and defines how current financial services laws apply to crypto platforms.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitmine Loads Up On 101,627 Ether In Record Post-December Buy

Bitmine Immersion Technologies significantly expanded its Ethereum holdings by acquiring 101,627 ETH in mid-April, marking its largest single-week purchase since December 2025. The company now holds nearly 5 million ETH, valued at approximately $11.5 billion, representing about 4.12% of all circulating Ether. Its goal is to reach 5% ownership. Of its total ETH, 3.33 million is actively staked, generating over $200 million in annualized revenue. Chairman Tom Lee stated that the company has increased its buying pace, believing Ethereum is nearing the end of a "mini-crypto winter." Bitmine also recently uplisted to the NYSE, improving its visibility among institutional investors.

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

Bitmine Loads Up On 101,627 Ether In Record Post-December Buy

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros