ASTER vs. Hyperliquid: Can USD1’s 34.3% growth shift market leadership?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-04-08Actualizado a 2026-04-08

Resumen

The market is shifting toward DeFi, with stablecoins acting as a key bridge between traditional and decentralized finance. In this context, Aster’s [ASTER] partnership with WorldLibertyFinancial [WLFI] positions WLFI’s native stablecoin, USD1, as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and real-world asset (RWA) initiatives. USD1’s market cap grew 34.3% this year, reflecting strong demand for structured, real-world assets. Despite broader market headwinds, the partnership aims to strengthen ASTER’s liquidity and competitiveness. While Hyperliquid [HYPE] dominated Q1 perpetual volume with $620 billion (compared to ASTER’s $318 billion) and saw its token rise 43%, ASTER declined 3.32%. The integration of USD1 could help ASTER narrow the gap with Hyperliquid and expand its presence in both trading and RWA markets.

The market is clearly shifting toward DeFi, and as a result, Layer 1s are rethinking how to stay ahead.

Consequently, it’s no surprise that most strategic partnerships are now centered around stablecoins. By acting as a bridge between TradFi and DeFi, they not only move capital on-chain more efficiently but also reduce friction and unlock access to key growth areas such as RWAs, AI, and NFTs.

In this context, Aster’s [ASTER] partnership with WorldLibertyFinancial [WLFI] fits perfectly. Under this deal, WLFI’s native stablecoin, USD1, becomes the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, further reinforcing the broader trend of connecting traditional finance more closely with DeFi via stablecoins.

Source: X

Unsurprisingly, the market reacted quickly. The most buzzed-about response came from Donald Trump Jr. on X, calling the partnership a major “win” for both networks. That said, when we look at the technical positioning, it’s clear this move is about more than just strengthening fundamentals.

On the charts, both ASTER and WLFI have been impacted by ongoing macro FUD, closing near critical support levels that could soon be tested. At the same time, on the longer timeframe, these assets still have a significant way to go before reclaiming early-October price levels.

Naturally, the key question becomes, can this partnership actually drive meaningful price gains? That’s especially relevant when you consider that other DEX tokens like Hyperliquid [HYPE] have managed to stay relatively bullish despite the same macro headwinds.

ASTER bets on USD1 to reclaim ground

When you think of stablecoins, USDT usually comes to mind first.

That said, its technical setup doesn’t always tell the full story. So far this year, USDT’s market cap has only grown about 1.6%. Considering that this period overlaps with roughly a 20% correction across the broader crypto market, it’s clear that USDT flows still influence wider price action.

But capital isn’t just chasing speculation anymore. The RWA market, for example, has grown 35% this year, showing that money is moving into more structured, real-world assets. In this context, USD1’s 34.3% jump in market cap highlights how well-positioned stablecoins are driving real growth, making the ASTER-WLFI partnership a clearly strategic play.

Source: TradingView (USD1)

Meanwhile, a similar divergence is visible in perpetual volume, which has cooled overall. Yet, on a chain-by-chain basis, Hyperliquid still dominates, reporting $620 billion in perp volume in Q1. Oil trading, in particular, has been a key driver, keeping Hyperliquid firmly in the lead even as broader market activity slows.

By comparison, ASTER posted $318 billion over the same period. Technically, that’s almost half of Hyperliquid’s volume. The impact shows in price action too, with HYPE ending Q1 up 43%, while ASTER slipped 3.32%. That said, the WLFI partnership puts ASTER in a position to strengthen its liquidity, potentially improving its competitiveness in the DEX perpetual market.

The main catalyst? USD1. Serving as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, it could be the lever that helps ASTER close the gap with Hyperliquid, creating a stronger presence across both trading and real-world asset markets.


Final Summary

  • USD1 now serves as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, strengthening liquidity.
  • While HYPE dominates perp volume, ASTER’s USD1 integration positions it to narrow the gap and expand its presence in both trading and real-world asset markets.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of the strategic partnership between Aster (ASTER) and WorldLibertyFinancial (WLFI)?

AThe partnership centers on WLFI's native stablecoin, USD1, becoming the base layer for ASTER's perpetual markets and Real-World Asset (RWA) initiatives, aiming to bridge traditional finance with DeFi and strengthen liquidity.

QHow did the market cap growth of USD1 compare to that of USDT, and what does this signify?

AUSD1's market cap grew by 34.3%, significantly outperforming USDT's 1.6% growth. This highlights how well-positioned stablecoins like USD1 are driving real growth, particularly in structured areas like RWA, as opposed to just speculation.

QHow did the trading volume and price performance of ASTER compare to Hyperliquid (HYPE) in Q1?

AIn Q1, Hyperliquid dominated with $620 billion in perpetual volume and its token HYPE ended the quarter up 43%. In comparison, ASTER posted $318 billion in volume (about half of HYPE's) and its token price slipped by 3.32%.

QWhat key advantage does the article suggest the USD1 integration could bring to ASTER?

AThe integration of USD1 as a base layer could serve as a lever to help ASTER strengthen its liquidity, improve its competitiveness in the perpetual markets, and narrow the gap with market leaders like Hyperliquid.

QBeyond speculation, what broader market trend is capital moving into, as evidenced by the growth of USD1?

ACapital is moving into more structured, real-world assets (RWA). The RWA market itself grew 35% this year, and USD1's significant growth is a reflection of this trend towards connecting traditional finance with DeFi.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ASTER

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Aster (ASTER) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Aster (ASTER) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Aster (ASTER)Después de comprar tu Aster (ASTER), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Aster (ASTER)Tradear fácilmente con Aster (ASTER) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

832 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.09.25Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ASTER

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ASTER (ASTER).

活动图片