Arthur Hayes claims that Trump administration's Bessent wants to use USD/JPY rate to force Federal Reserve to print money

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-12Actualizado a 2026-08-12

Resumen

Arthur Hayes, former BitMEX CEO, argues that Trump administration Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent plans to use the dollar-yen exchange rate to force the Federal Reserve to print money. Hayes focuses on the Fed's FIMA repo facility mechanism. In his essay "The Yen Earthquake," Hayes outlines three ways Japan could strengthen the yen: aggressive BOJ rate hikes, selling foreign assets like U.S. Treasuries, or borrowing dollars via FIMA to buy yen. He dismisses rate hikes as damaging to the BOJ's balance sheet and government finances. Selling U.S. assets, while politically cleaner for Japan, would remove a major source of demand for American markets, harming the U.S. Hayes asserts Bessent favors the third option: Japan would pledge its U.S. Treasury holdings (estimated at ~$1.37 trillion) as collateral via FIMA, receive newly created dollars from the Fed, sell those dollars for yen on the forex market, and reinvest the yen domestically. This would support the yen without forcing asset sales, but would expand the Fed's balance sheet by creating new dollar liquidity. Hayes concludes this potential massive liquidity injection is bullish for assets like Bitcoin, gold, gold miners, and Ethereum—the latter due to its role in Real World Assets (RWA) and not having surpassed its previous all-time high.

Arthur Hayes believes that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is preparing a method to strengthen the yen, which could also force the Federal Reserve to create a large amount of new dollar liquidity. Arthur's argument focuses on the Fed's FIMA repo mechanism.

In his latest essay titled "Yen-quake," Arthur stated that Japan could pledge its U.S. Treasury bonds as collateral at the Federal Reserve, borrow dollars, sell those dollars for yen, and then use the yen to purchase Japanese assets.

However, according to Arthur, a crucial aspect of this system is the creation of dollars, as an expanded Federal Reserve balance sheet could directly contribute to the growth of Bitcoin, Ether, gold, miners, and other financial assets.

Arthur argues that raising interest rates and selling foreign assets would create problems Japan and the U.S. want to avoid

Arthur outlines three ways Japan could strengthen the yen. The Bank of Japan could aggressively raise interest rates. The government could push GPIF and other institutions to sell overseas assets and bring cash back to the country.

Alternatively, the Ministry of Finance could borrow dollars from the Federal Reserve via FIMA and use those dollars to buy yen. Arthur believes the third option is acceptable to both Washington and Tokyo.

The interest rate differential makes the first option difficult to implement. Arthur notes that dollars currently yield approximately 2.75 percentage points more than yen. Traders can borrow yen at low rates, exchange them for dollars, and then buy Treasury bills. Raising interest rates in Japan would narrow this differential and support the yen.

On the other hand, the Bank of Japan holds a massive amount of Japanese government bonds due to years of yield curve control policy. Raising interest rates would lower the value of these bonds and create even larger unrealized losses for the central bank. Furthermore, higher government bond yields would increase the Japanese government's expenses.

"What happens when interest rates rise? Bond prices fall. The lower bond prices fall, the larger the Bank of Japan's unrealized losses. Unlike you, readers, the Bank of Japan can lose an infinite amount of yen because it can print them at will."

Arthur also notes that a sudden surge in the yen could force traders who borrowed yen to finance stock and bond positions in other countries to quickly close those positions.

The second option is politically cleaner within Japan but much riskier for American markets. GPIF manages assets worth approximately $1 to $2 trillion. Allocation changes in 2014 led to increased purchases of foreign stocks and bonds, creating a steady source of yen selling.

Arthur says Japanese officials are currently discussing the possibility of investing more funds in domestic securities. If this policy eventually reaches GPIF, hundreds of billions of dollars could flow back to Japan.

But if Japan becomes a major seller of U.S. Treasury bonds and American stocks, Washington would receive a massive amount of yen, but lose one of the largest overseas sources of demand for U.S. assets.

Arthur says neither country wants to find out what would happen if the USD/JPY rate dropped from around 160 to approximately 90, which he termed the fair value purchasing power parity estimate.

Bessent wants FIMA to allow Japan to buy yen while the Federal Reserve supplies dollars

Arthur says the third option avoids forcing Japan to sell its Treasury bonds, as the Ministry of Finance pledges Treasury securities as collateral via FIMA. The Fed then provides dollars against this collateral. Tokyo sells these dollars on the forex market and buys yen. The yen can then be used to purchase Japanese government bonds and stocks in the domestic market.

"The Ministry of Finance conducts repo operations on Treasury bonds and receives a dollar loan under the Fed's FIMA facility. The Ministry of Finance sells the dollars and buys yen on the global forex market. The Ministry of Finance reinvests the yen domestically by purchasing Japanese government bonds and stocks."

Arthur argues that the Federal Reserve would have to create the dollars used for these loans. As FIMA facility borrowing grows, the central bank's balance sheet would expand alongside it.

This is where his Bitcoin thesis comes in. The collateral is enormous. Arthur estimates that the Japanese government owns $1.143 trillion in U.S. Treasury bonds. GPIF owns another $230 billion.

Combined, this gives them about $1.373 trillion in Treasury bonds.

For comparison, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet increased by roughly $4 trillion from 2020 to the end of 2021.

Arthur says the Fed's Foreign Currency Subcommittee could change the rules for operating FIMA. He expects Trump and Bessent to push Fed Chair Kevin Warsh for the necessary changes.

Arthur concluded his essay by stating that his current views are already focused on Bitcoin, physical gold, and gold miners.

Arthur also views Ether as the main large-cap crypto alternative because "the main idea is that it's the only major shitcoin that hasn't surpassed its 2025 all-time high; furthermore, Ethereum will become the security layer for risk-weighted assets (RWA)."

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Arthur Hayes, what is the main mechanism that Scott Bessent (from the Trump administration) might use to strengthen the yen and potentially force the Fed to print money?

AThe main mechanism is the Federal Reserve's FIMA repo facility. Japan could pledge its US Treasury holdings as collateral at the Fed, borrow dollars, sell those dollars to buy yen, and then use the yen to purchase Japanese domestic assets. This process would require the Fed to create the dollars used for these loans.

QWhat are the three ways Arthur Hayes outlines for Japan to strengthen its currency (yen)?

AThe three ways are: 1) The Bank of Japan aggressively raising interest rates. 2) The Japanese government encouraging institutions like GPIF to sell foreign assets and repatriate the cash. 3) The Ministry of Finance borrowing dollars from the Fed via the FIMA repo facility and using those dollars to buy yen on the FX market.

QWhy does Arthur Hayes argue that Japan and the US would want to avoid the first two methods of strengthening the yen (raising rates or selling foreign assets)?

ARaising interest rates would cause large unrealized losses on the Bank of Japan's massive holdings of Japanese government bonds and increase the Japanese government's borrowing costs. Selling foreign assets, particularly US Treasuries and stocks, would remove a major source of foreign demand for US assets, which is politically dangerous for Washington and could destabilize American markets.

QHow does Arthur Hayes link the potential use of the FIMA facility to his investment thesis for Bitcoin?

AHe links it by stating that the process would require the Federal Reserve to create new dollar liquidity, expanding its balance sheet. Historically, such expansion of central bank balance sheets and increased monetary liquidity has been bullish for assets like Bitcoin, gold, and miners, as it creates inflationary pressures and devalues fiat currencies.

QWhat is Arthur Hayes' current investment focus, as mentioned at the end of his essay 'Yen Earthquake'?

AHis current investment focus is on Bitcoin, physical gold, and gold miners. He also views Ether (Ethereum) as the main large-cap crypto alternative, citing its potential role as the security layer for Real World Assets (RWA) and the fact it hasn't surpassed its previous all-time high.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: ‘It was for us, not them’

Five years after becoming the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, El Salvador's national experiment is widely viewed as a failure based on its original stated goals of banking the unbanked, slashing remittance costs, and attracting major foreign investment. Research indicates mass adoption by citizens never occurred; Bitcoin use remained concentrated among young, urban, educated, and already banked males. The government's Chivo wallet failed to address core barriers to financial inclusion, and Bitcoin accounted for barely 1% of remittances by 2024, offering little advantage as most funds arrive in US dollars. Following a 2024 IMF financing deal, El Salvador scaled back its involvement, making Bitcoin acceptance voluntary and limiting state use. However, the experiment undeniably changed the global conversation, turning nation-state Bitcoin adoption from theory into reality and positioning El Salvador at the center of the Bitcoin movement. It provided a proof of concept and a global platform, attracting prominent Bitcoin advocates. Success stories exist in localized economies like Bitcoin Beach, but analysts note the project's symbolic benefits were largely "for" the international Bitcoin community rather than "for" the economic transformation of most Salvadorans. The assessment is further complicated by President Nayib Bukele's popular, yet authoritarian, governance style, which delivered drastically improved security but raised concerns about centralized power and civil liberties. Ultimately, Bitcoin gave Bukele a global stage, and Bukele gave Bitcoin its first national adoption test.

cointelegraphHace 18 min(s)

El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: ‘It was for us, not them’

cointelegraphHace 18 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片