Arthur Hayes argues new Fed liquidity tool “RMP” masks renewed money printing

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-19Actualizado a 2025-12-19

Resumen

Arthur Hayes, former BitMEX CEO, argues the Federal Reserve's new "Reserve Management Purchases" (RMP) program is effectively a disguised form of quantitative easing (QE). He claims that by purchasing short-term Treasury bills and managing liquidity, the Fed is financing government spending while avoiding the political stigma of QE. Hayes warns this is highly inflationary and erodes the purchasing power of ordinary citizens, while benefiting holders of scarce assets like Bitcoin, gold, and silver. The article notes the Fed recently cut rates and announced $40 billion in short-term Treasury purchases, which Chair Jerome Powell framed as a technical adjustment. However, analysts suggest mixed signals may dampen a sustained Bitcoin rally. Polymarket data indicates a high probability of no further rate cuts in January.

Arthur Hayes, co-founder and former CEO of crypto exchange BitMEX, argued in a Substack essay published Friday that the Federal Reserve’s new “reserve management purchases” (RMP) program is effectively a rebranded form of quantitative easing.

Hayes argues that by buying short-term Treasury bills and recycling liquidity through money markets, the Fed is effectively financing government spending while avoiding the political stigma of quantitative easing, even as officials frame the program as a technical liquidity operation.

“The RMP is a thinly disguised way for the Fed to cash the government’s checks. This is highly inflationary from both a financial and real goods/services perspective,” he wrote.
US Treasury issuance by maturity. Source: MacroMicro

Hayes said policies like RMP expand fiat liquidity and, in his view, favor scarce assets such as Bitcoin, gold and silver.

I love QE because it means money printing, and thankfully I own financial assets like gold, gold/silver mining stocks, and Bitcoin that rise faster than the pace of fiat money creation.

At the same time, he warned that people without assets are harmed, as money creation erodes purchasing power, weakens wages relative to prices and shifts wealth toward asset holders.

“Unfortunately, in the here and now for most of humanity, money printing destroys their dignity as productive humans,” he wrote. “When the government intentionally debases the currency, it destroys the link between energy inputs and economic outputs.”

Related: Bitcoin rebounds on Japan rate hike as Arthur Hayes sees dollar at 200 yen

Polymarket points to pause after December rate cut

On Dec. 10, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) cut interest rates by 25 basis points and announced purchases of short-term Treasury securities, a move Fed Chair Jerome Powell said was “solely for the purpose of maintaining an ample supply of reserves” and separate from the stance of monetary policy.

The Fed said the purchases would initially total about $40 billion in the first month and could remain elevated for several months to ease near-term pressures in money markets, particularly around seasonal fluctuations such as tax payments.

Despite the interest rate cut and the announcement of short-term Treasury purchases, analysts said mixed signals from Powell were likely to dampen a sustained Bitcoin rally until the rate-cutting cycle resumes in 2026.

The price of Bitcoin was about $92,695 on Dec. 10, according to Yahoo Finance data. It is was trading around $87,300 at time of writing.

At the time of writing, Polymarket traders were overwhelmingly pricing in no change to Fed policy in January, with the probability of rates staying unchanged at about 77%, while odds of another 25 basis point cut sit near 21% and larger moves are viewed as highly unlikely.

Odds of Fed rate cut in Jan. Source: Polymarket

Powell’s term is set to expire in May 2026. US President Donald Trump, who has publicly pushed for the next Fed chair to pursue aggressive interest rate cuts, is preparing to interview finalists to succeed him, with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett widely viewed as the frontrunner.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Arthur Hayes' main argument regarding the Federal Reserve's new RMP program?

AArthur Hayes argues that the Fed's Reserve Management Purchases (RMP) program is effectively a rebranded form of quantitative easing (QE) that allows the Fed to finance government spending while avoiding the political stigma associated with QE.

QAccording to Hayes, what is the inflationary impact of the RMP program?

AHayes states that the RMP is 'highly inflationary from both a financial and real goods/services perspective' because it expands fiat liquidity.

QWhich assets does Hayes believe benefit from policies like RMP and QE?

AHayes believes that scarce assets such as Bitcoin, gold, and silver mining stocks benefit from these policies, as they tend to rise faster than the pace of fiat money creation.

QWhat was the Fed's stated reason for initiating the purchases of short-term Treasury securities?

AFed Chair Jerome Powell stated that the purchases were 'solely for the purpose of maintaining an ample supply of reserves' and were a technical liquidity operation, separate from the stance of monetary policy.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the Fed's January policy meeting, according to Polymarket data?

AAccording to Polymarket, traders are pricing in a 77% probability of no change to interest rates in January, with only a 21% chance of another 25 basis point cut.

Lecturas Relacionadas

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片