ARK Invest Enters Broader Crypto ETFs With CoinDesk 20

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-24Actualizado a 2026-01-24

Resumen

ARK Invest has filed with U.S. regulators to launch two crypto index ETFs linked to the CoinDesk 20 index, marking its first major expansion beyond Bitcoin-focused products. One ETF will track the index—which includes Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, XRP, and Cardano—using regulated futures contracts rather than holding cryptocurrencies directly. The second will exclude Bitcoin entirely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures. Both are expected to list on NYSE Arca. This move places ARK among other firms like WisdomTree, ProShares, and VanEck, which have also filed for or updated proposals for crypto ETFs tracking a range of digital assets. The growing number of filings reflects increasing institutional interest in diversified crypto exposure through regulated derivatives, aiming to reduce risks associated with single-asset investments.

The American investment management firm ARK Invest has filed with U.S. regulators to roll out two crypto index exchange-traded funds associated with the CoinDesk 20 index, highlighting the first push of the company into wider crypto exposure after Bitcoin.

As per the regulatory filing, the given ETFs would trace down the daily performance of the CoinDesk 20 index, leveraging regulated futures contracts instead of holding crypto directly. A single fund would consist of Bitcoin with other prominent altcoins like Ether, Solana, XRP and Cardano.

Meanwhile, the second product will keep out Bitcoin completely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures. Both funds are anticipated for NYSE Arca listing, placing ARK along with other companies as competition escalates for diversified crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) offerings.

Other Firm’s Filings

On September 22 last year, WisdomTree filed its registration for a CoinDesk 20 Fund in Delaware, marking an initial step toward a U.S. ETF associated with the CoinDesk 20 index that covers the biggest cryptocurrencies by market cap.

At the same time, ProShares also gave its SEC filing for the ProShares CoinDesk Crypto 20 ETF on October 22, 2025, looking for an approval for a diversified crypto ETF that would trace the same index through derivatives instead of direct holdings.

Apart from these, VanEck also revised its Solana ETF proposal, cutting fees to surge its appeal. Now, it is listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, highlighting a major step in taking Solana-based investment.

Other companies, such as 21Shares, have also updated filings for funds associated with various crypto assets. REX-Osprey is also a part of the competition, having filings for ETFs tracking altcoins like ADA, XLM and SUI.

The filing numbers are continuously increasing, showing a surged interest of institutional investors. In July, Cboe BZX filed to list a Solana ETF that would offer direct exposure to SOL. The objectives of these products are to provide greater exposure and restrict the risks associated with individual asset investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Kansas Bill Aims to Establish Bitcoin and Digital Asset Reserve Fund

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of ARK Invest's recent regulatory filing regarding crypto ETFs?

AARK Invest has filed to launch two crypto index exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the CoinDesk 20 index, marking the company's first major expansion into broader crypto exposure beyond Bitcoin.

QHow will the two proposed ARK Invest ETFs gain exposure to cryptocurrencies, and what is a key difference between them?

ABoth ETFs will use regulated futures contracts to track the daily performance of the CoinDesk 20 index rather than holding cryptocurrencies directly. One fund includes Bitcoin along with other altcoins, while the second fund excludes Bitcoin entirely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures.

QWhich other investment firms have recently filed for ETFs linked to the CoinDesk 20 index?

AWisdomTree filed for a CoinDesk 20 Fund in September of last year, and ProShares submitted an SEC filing for the ProShares CoinDesk Crypto 20 ETF in October 2025, both aiming to track the same index using derivatives.

QWhat recent action did VanEck take regarding its Solana ETF proposal, and where is it listed?

AVanEck revised its Solana ETF proposal by reducing fees to increase its appeal, and it is now listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, representing a significant step for Solana-based investment products.

QWhat broader trend do the increasing number of crypto ETF filings indicate, according to the article?

AThe growing number of filings reflects a surge in interest from institutional investors seeking to provide greater crypto exposure while mitigating the risks associated with individual asset investments through diversified ETF offerings.

Lecturas Relacionadas

A major Bitcoin market player, inactive for four years, transferred Bitcoin worth about 46 million dollars! Here are the details

A large Bitcoin investor, inactive for four years, has moved 730 BTC worth approximately $46.12 million. The assets, accumulated over seven years, were transferred to a newly created wallet from an address with no prior transaction history. Analysts suggest the move could be linked to recently discovered security vulnerabilities in hardware wallets, potentially prompting long-term holders to migrate funds for safety. There is no evidence the bitcoins were sent to an exchange, leaving the intent—whether for security or potential sale—unclear. This follows another recent large transfer of over 16,400 BTC (worth >$1 billion) by a separate long-term holder. Such activity signals renewed movement of funds among major investors, though transfers between wallets do not necessarily indicate imminent selling and can be for security or portfolio management purposes.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

A major Bitcoin market player, inactive for four years, transferred Bitcoin worth about 46 million dollars! Here are the details

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Bitcoin may find bear market bottom in August: 10x Research

Research firm 10x Research suggests Bitcoin could confirm a bear-market bottom in August if it achieves a monthly close above $63,000, which would turn several of their technical indicators bullish. While their analysis was prepared with Bitcoin trading at $63,140, a slight gain from July's close could trigger this signal. The report cites steady Federal Reserve rates as a base case but notes risks from potential rate hikes and geopolitical conflict. Additional selling pressure is expected from miners and treasury companies. Grayscale's research head separately suggested Bitcoin may have bottomed earlier than the traditional four-year cycle, with macro conditions being the primary price driver. Other indicators, like over half of Bitcoin's supply being held at a loss and a record balance held by long-term investors, are also seen as signs a market bottom is approaching.

cointelegraphHace 21 min(s)

Bitcoin may find bear market bottom in August: 10x Research

cointelegraphHace 21 min(s)

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Should Bitcoin Be "Immutable"? Craig Wright Reignites Governance Route Dispute

The debate over Bitcoin's governance is reignited by Craig Wright, who argues the protocol should remain permanently fixed and immutable. He views Bitcoin's core value as its transparent, unchangeable monetary rules, contrasting it with traditional finance. This stance sparks discussion on whether Bitcoin should evolve to address security threats, user demands, and efficiency, or if its determinism is its primary strength. The article notes that Bitcoin has undergone significant upgrades like SegWit and Taproot, achieved through community consensus rather than top-down decisions. However, tension persists between the need for stability—which fosters trust—and the need for adaptation to remain competitive. A key concern is the influence of core developers versus the decentralized ideal. Ultimately, the debate centers on finding a governance model that balances immutable core principles with the ability to innovate. This challenge is fundamental to Bitcoin's future as a decentralized global system.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Should Bitcoin Be "Immutable"? Craig Wright Reignites Governance Route Dispute

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot