ARK Invest Buys $72 Million in Crypto Stocks as Bitcoin Price Falls

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

ARK Invest, led by Cathie Wood, purchased $72 million in crypto-related stocks as Bitcoin’s price briefly fell below $75,000. The investment was spread across three ETFs—ARKF, ARKK, and ARKW—and included major allocations to companies like Robinhood ($32.7M), CoreWeave ($14.6M), Circle Internet ($9.4M), and others such as Bitmine, Bullish, Block, and Coinbase. This move reflects ARK’s strategy of capitalizing on market downturns to increase exposure to crypto trading and infrastructure firms. The firm views crypto market weakness as temporary and believes in long-term adoption and diversification benefits, having made similar purchases earlier in the year.

ARK Investment, an investment firm led by the investor Cathie Wood, had purchased more than $70 million worth of crypto-related stocks as the bitcoin price fell briefly below $75,000. They used the market weakness to increase the exposure to companies tied to crypto trading and stablecoins.

How ARK spent $72 million

The investment was spread across three ARK ETFs, such as ARKF, ARKK, and ARKW. They spent $72 million buying shares of companies like Rodinhood ($32.7 million), CoreWeave ($14.6 million), Circle Internet ($9.4 million), Bitmine Immersion Technologies ($6.3 million), Bullish ($6 million), Block ($1.9 million), and Coinbase ($1.3 million). The largest purchase was Robinhood, which shows interest in trading platforms and crypto-related infrastructure.

ARK’s long-term strategy belief

These purchases from ARK show his long-term strategy of buying during the market downturns. The firm believes that Crypto downturns are temporary and the market drops create buying opportunities. They strongly believe that long-term crypto adoption will lead to higher trading activity and revenue for the exchanges. The ARK has already done this by purchasing around $21.5 million worth of crypto stocks in late January when Bitcoin fell below $90K.

Cathie Wood consistently said that Bitcoin can be a good diversification asset for investors. According to ARK’s research, Bitcoin does not move in sync with stocks and other traditional assets, which makes it useful for spreading risk in investment portfolios. This belief shows that ARK is investing in crypto companies continuously, even during market weakness.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Sei (SEI) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total amount ARK Invest spent on crypto-related stocks during the recent Bitcoin price drop?

AARK Invest spent a total of $72 million on crypto-related stocks.

QWhich company received the largest investment from ARK's recent $72 million purchase?

ARobinhood received the largest investment of $32.7 million.

QWhat is ARK Invest's strategy when it comes to buying crypto stocks during market downturns?

AARK Invest employs a long-term strategy of buying during market downturns, believing that crypto market drops are temporary and create buying opportunities for long-term adoption growth.

QWhich ARK ETFs were used to make these crypto stock purchases?

AThe purchases were spread across three ARK ETFs: ARKF, ARKK, and ARKW.

QWhy does Cathie Wood believe Bitcoin is a good diversification asset for investors?

ACathie Wood believes Bitcoin is a good diversification asset because it does not move in sync with stocks and other traditional assets, making it useful for spreading risk in investment portfolios.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

White House Crypto Advisor Fires Back At Bank CEOs In Stablecoin Rewards Clash

As a key crypto market structure bill nears a markup, the White House's top crypto advisor has criticized bank CEOs for reigniting a debate over stablecoin rewards. This follows a letter from American Bankers Association CEO Rob Nichols urging bank executives to pressure lawmakers to revise the CLARITY Act, claiming its current language inadequately prevents crypto firms from offering "interest-like rewards" on payment stablecoins, which could risk bank deposits and financial stability. The bill prohibits interest-equivalent payments but allows rewards for specific activities like staking. Patrick Witt, a White House digital assets advisor, rebuked the banking CEOs for refusing to attend White House mediation meetings on this issue, which has delayed the bill for months. While Senate sources suggest the banking lobby's push is weak and the committee is focused on other bill aspects, the debate could resurface when the legislation reaches the full Senate.

bitcoinistHace 56 min(s)

White House Crypto Advisor Fires Back At Bank CEOs In Stablecoin Rewards Clash

bitcoinistHace 56 min(s)

Here Are The Major Bitcoin Levels To Watch After Breaking $80,000

Bitcoin has closed a week above $80,000 for the first time since late January, strengthening the bullish case after breaking through the $78,000 to $80,000 bearish order block. The key to future price action now depends on whether bulls can hold two critical levels. The first is the $78,000 floor, which must be defended to confirm the former resistance zone has turned into support. The second is the $82,000 lower-high area; a clean break above it could open the path toward the next major resistance at $90,000. However, a truly bullish trend shift would only be confirmed with a high-timeframe close above the $97,900 "Change of Character" level, which would break the pattern of lower highs formed since late 2025. While currently trading around $81,000, analysis suggests there remains a significant chance Bitcoin retests the $60,000 zone before any sustained upward move.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Here Are The Major Bitcoin Levels To Watch After Breaking $80,000

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Zcash Is Up 1,500% And Its Biggest Backer Says This Is Why

Zcash (ZEC) has surged approximately 1,500%, a rally attributed by prominent backer Josh Swihart to fundamental resets in governance, product strategy, narrative, and organization. Three years ago, Zcash had strong cryptography but weak momentum. Today, shielded transaction adoption has risen dramatically, and over $3 billion in value is held in shielded wallets. Key changes include a governance reset where direct funding to core institutions ended, breaking a perceived "stranglehold" and empowering the broader community. Product focus shifted to user adoption, exemplified by the Zodl wallet, which contributed to shielded supply rising from 11% to about 30%. The narrative moved from "privacy coin" to "unstoppable private money," improving institutional perception and leading to listings and investment. Organizationally, key developers formed the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL), raising $25 million to scale adoption. Current priorities are improving user experience, scalability (targeting faster block times), and post-quantum security. Swihart concluded these compounded efforts explain Zcash's accelerated growth.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Zcash Is Up 1,500% And Its Biggest Backer Says This Is Why

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros