Argentina Bans Polymarket Over Illegal Gambling Concerns Following Colombia

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-17Actualizado a 2026-03-17

Resumen

Argentina has blocked the prediction market platform Polymarket following a court ruling in Buenos Aires that declared its operations illegal under the country's gambling regulations. Authorities have directed internet service providers and app stores to restrict access to the platform. Officials raised concerns over the use of cryptocurrencies for betting and the lack of user identity checks, which could allow minors to participate. The decision follows similar action taken by Colombia, where Polymarket was also classified as an illegal gambling operation for failing to meet licensing requirements. The case reflects growing global regulatory scrutiny of crypto-based prediction markets, which are increasingly being treated as gambling platforms due to their structure and potential risks to market integrity.

Argentina’s authorities have blocked Polymarket across the country after a ruling by a Buenos Aires court. It declared that it operated illegally and outside the country’s legal framework and regulations regarding gambling. The country’s authorities have asked ENACOM to impose a blockade against Polymarket by internet service providers. The limited access to mobile applications across the country. They have also asked app stores to remove Polymarket applications to prevent users from accessing them.

It was also determined that the platform enabled users to place bets using cryptocurrencies. And the traditional forms of payment in an easy manner. There were also concerns raised by officials regarding the lack of verification measures for the identity of users. This may lead minors to indulge in illegal betting activities. Complaints from local gambling organizations prompted legal action against the platform’s operations.

Regulatory Concerns and Regional Crackdown Expand

Investigations were conducted regarding suspicious trading activities related to inflation prediction markets. This have recently received significant regulatory interest from financial oversight organizations. Reports have been received about unusual betting patterns that have sparked concerns about a potential case. The officials have studied the trading and have observed that some behaviors may have suggested a potential information advantage for some groups in the entire system. This may have compromised the overall integrity and transparency in the current decentralized prediction markets operating globally.

It is worth noting that the authorities concluded that the platform operated like an online betting system. The authorities noted that prediction markets generally take a similar form to gambling structures, in which users of the platforms make predictions about real-world events in order to obtain financial rewards. The classification of prediction markets as gambling structures increases the need for stricter regulation and enforcement of the existing gambling laws.

Argentina’s decision comes in the wake of a similar decision made by the Colombian authorities, banning Polymarket from operating within their jurisdiction since it did not comply with the licensing requirements. The Colombian authorities classified the prediction platform as an illegal gambling platform and asked all the internet service providers within the country to block the platform immediately. The case is a testament to the increasing global scrutiny of crypto-based platforms that take a similar form to gambling and trading mechanisms.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Polymarket Users Threaten Journalist Over Iran Missile Report Dispute

TagsArgentinaBlockchainCRYPTO GAMBLINGCryptocurrencyexchangegamblingPolymarket

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Argentina block Polymarket?

AArgentina blocked Polymarket because a Buenos Aires court ruled that it operated illegally outside the country's legal gambling framework and regulations.

QWhat actions did Argentine authorities take against Polymarket?

AAuthorities asked ENACOM to impose an ISP blockade, restricted access to its applications, and requested app stores to remove Polymarket's apps.

QWhat were the specific concerns officials had about Polymarket platform?

AOfficials raised concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies for betting, lack of user identity verification, and the risk of minors engaging in illegal betting activities.

QHow did Argentina classify Polymarket's operations?

AArgentina classified Polymarket as an online betting system, noting that prediction markets function similarly to gambling structures where users predict real-world events for financial rewards.

QWhich other country recently took similar action against Polymarket?

AColombia recently banned Polymarket for operating without complying with licensing requirements, classifying it as an illegal gambling platform.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片