Are the Bulls Losing Control? As Momentum Pauses and Bears Probe, SUI Hits the Brakes After a 7% Slip

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-05Actualizado a 2026-02-05

Resumen

The cryptocurrency market is experiencing a bearish trend, with Bitcoin and Ethereum trading at $71.3K and $2.1K respectively amid widespread fear. SUI has declined sharply by 7.39%, dropping to $1.04 after facing intense selling pressure. Trading volume surged by 25.98% to $1.18 billion, accompanied by significant liquidations. Technical indicators suggest continued bearish momentum, with the MACD below zero indicating weak upside potential. The asset is nearing oversold territory with an RSI of 31.62, reflecting strong selling pressure. Key support levels are identified at $0.94, with potential for decline toward $0.84 if bearish conditions persist. Conversely, a reversal could see SUI target resistance at $1.14, with potential to reach $1.24 if bullish momentum strengthens. The Chaikin Money Flow shows mild accumulation, while Bull Bear Power confirms bearish dominance. Overall, SUI faces downward pressure but shows tentative signs of potential recovery if buying interest increases.

The market-wide red light is not in the mood to lose voltage. As hours pass by, the bearish hold tightens, and the momentum of the crypto assets is weakening. The broader market sentiment is extreme fear, which brings caution across the tokens. Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) are currently trading at $71.3K and $2.1K, respectively. Among the altcoins, SUI dives deep with 7.39% loss.

In the early hours, the asset was trading on the upside, at around $1.14 and later, with intense bearish pressure, the SUI price retraced to a bottom of $1.04. If the bears get fatter, the price action loses more traction and revisits former lows. SUI is trading at $1.04, with the trading volume soaring by 25.98%, reaching $1.18 billion. Besides, $2.32 million worth of SUI was liquidated in the market.

With the bearish momentum controlling the SUI market, the price could see losses, and it descends to find its key support at $0.94. The death cross might take place amid the strong downside correction, which may likely trigger the asset’s price to retest the $0.84 range or even lower.

Upon a reversal, the SUI price might push the bulls to take charge, aiming to climb to the nearest resistance at around $1.14. Assuming the upside pressure is showing increasing resilience, the golden cross could emerge, and gradually, the price movement may send the price above $1.24.

Weak Momentum Signals Appear on SUI’s Technical Chart

Both the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and signal line of SUI are settled below the zero line, implying a weak red momentum. Notably, as long as the lines stay below zero, the upside moves are limited. Moreover, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator at 0.18 points toward the buying pressure in the SUI market. The capital is flowing into the asset, showing mild to moderate accumulation. This is not an extremely strong signal, thus it leans bullish.

SUI’s Bull Bear Power (BBP) value found at -0.0933 signals bearish dominance, with the price trading below key averages. At the same time, as the ongoing pressure is not extreme, there is weak upside momentum, and any brief rebounds may face resistance unless buying strength improves. Furthermore, the daily Relative Strength Index reading of 31.62 displays that the asset is near the oversold territory. This significantly reflects strong selling pressure and weak momentum for SUI.

Top Updated Crypto News

BNB Takes an 8% Knock: Is More Downside Risk Lurking, or Is a Dead-Cat Bounce Around the Corner?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current market sentiment and how is it affecting SUI?

AThe broader market sentiment is extreme fear, which is causing caution across tokens. This bearish environment is contributing to SUI's significant price decline of 7.39%.

QWhat are the key support and resistance levels for SUI mentioned in the article?

AThe key support level for SUI is at $0.94, with potential to retest $0.84 or lower if bearish pressure continues. The nearest resistance level is around $1.14, with potential to climb above $1.24 if bullish momentum returns.

QWhat do the technical indicators (MACD, CMF, BBP, RSI) suggest about SUI's momentum?

AThe MACD below zero indicates weak bearish momentum. The CMF at 0.18 shows mild to moderate buying pressure and accumulation. The BBP value of -0.0933 signals bearish dominance. The RSI reading of 31.62 indicates the asset is near oversold territory, reflecting strong selling pressure.

QHow much trading volume and liquidation occurred for SUI during this price movement?

ASUI's trading volume soared by 25.98%, reaching $1.18 billion. Additionally, $2.32 million worth of SUI was liquidated in the market during this decline.

QWhat potential pattern formations are mentioned that could impact SUI's future price movement?

AThe article mentions a potential 'death cross' formation amid strong downside correction that could drive prices lower, and conversely, a potential 'golden cross' that could emerge if upside pressure shows increasing resilience, potentially sending the price above $1.24.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCryptoHace 54 min(s)

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCryptoHace 54 min(s)

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros