Anthropic Tests "Lobster" Conway: Supports Independent UI, Webhook Activation, and Custom Extension Standards

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-02Actualizado a 2026-04-02

Resumen

Anthropic is actively developing "Conway," a persistent agent solution designed to provide Claude with an always-on, independently running intelligent environment. It features a standalone UI instance, operating as a traditional chat interface and more of a dedicated workspace. Conway can directly control browsers, connect to external services, and integrate Claude Code for deeper code execution and task handling. It supports Webhook-based invocation, enabling external services or events to trigger automated workflows. Additionally, Conway will support for extensions through the upcoming CNW ZIP standard, allowing developers to build custom tools, UI tabs, and context handlers, similar to an app store ecosystem. This enhancement aims to transform Claude from a reactive conversational tool into a proactive, multi-step task assistant, positioning it as a strong competitor in the AI agent space and advancing the trend toward always-on AI capabilities.

Anthropic is actively developing a persistent agent solution named Conway, aimed at creating an always-on, independently running intelligent environment for Claude.

According to related information, Conway will feature an independent UI instance, moving beyond the traditional chat interface to operate as a standalone agent workspace. It will be capable of directly controlling browsers, connecting external connectors, and integrating Claude Code functionality (potentially involving Epitax-related features), enabling deeper code execution and task handling. Simultaneously, Conway supports invocation via Webhooks, allowing external services or events to trigger agent workflows, thereby boosting automated response capabilities.

Additionally, Conway will support an extension system. Anthropic is set to launch the CNW ZIP standard, which developers can use to easily build custom tools, UI tabs, and context handlers, forming an ecosystem expansion capability similar to an "app store." This will significantly enhance Claude's flexibility and scalability in handling complex tasks.

The emergence of Conway is seen as a key strategic move by Anthropic in the AI agent domain, aiming to transform Claude from a passive conversational tool into a persistent assistant capable of continuous operation and autonomous execution of multi-step tasks. It not only supports browser automation and event triggering but also strengthens code generation, execution, and problem-solving capabilities through native integration of Claude Code.

Industry observers believe that Conway has the potential to become a strong competitor to rivals like OpenClaw, driving the advancement of AI agents toward an "always-on" direction. The era where Claude can truly "show its prowess" may be just around the corner.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the persistent agent solution being developed by Anthropic for Claude?

AThe persistent agent solution being developed by Anthropic for Claude is named Conway.

QHow does Conway differ from a traditional chat interface?

AConway differs by being an independent UI instance that operates as a standalone agent workspace, capable of directly controlling the browser, connecting to external connectors, and integrating Claude Code functionality.

QWhat method does Conway support to allow external services or events to trigger its work?

AConway supports being invoked via Webhook, which allows external services or events to trigger the agent's work and enhance automated response capabilities.

QWhat is the name of the extension standard that will allow developers to build custom tools for Conway?

AThe extension standard that developers can use to build custom tools, UI tabs, and context handlers for Conway is called the CNW ZIP standard.

QHow is Conway expected to transform the role of Claude according to the article?

AConway is expected to transform Claude from a passive conversational tool into a persistent assistant that can run continuously and autonomously execute multi-step tasks, moving towards an 'always-on' AI agent direction.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

After years of debate, Uniswap's UNI token has finally entered a 'buyback bull' phase following the long-awaited activation of its fee-switch mechanism. The UNIfication proposal, executed in December 2025, redirected a portion of protocol fees from select pools and Unichain sequencer revenue into a treasury (TokenJar) dedicated to buying back and permanently burning UNI. Initial market reaction was muted due to modest early burn rates. A significant shift occurred in July 2026 with the launch of Robinhood Chain. Uniswap's immediate deployment there skyrocketed trading volume, making it a top fee-generator. Subsequently, governance votes extended the fee mechanism to v4 pools and Robinhood Chain, causing protocol revenue to nearly triple. Daily funds directed to UNI burns rose sharply, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half. This transitioned UNI's narrative from a governance token to a cash-flow asset backed by a perpetual automatic buyer. UNI's price, which had languished around $2.30 in early June, nearly doubled to approach $4.60 by late July. Analysts credit this to the tangible cash flow from fees rather than mere speculation. Unlike many newer projects where buybacks are offset by large investor unlocks, UNI's six-year history has resulted in a widely distributed and relatively clean supply, allowing the buyback pressure to effectively impact the secondary market. The key test will be whether trading activity, particularly on Robinhood Chain, sustains after its initial gas subsidies expire.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

The storage chip sector experienced a dramatic overnight rebound in US markets, with major stocks like SK Hynix and Micron surging over 17%. This sharp reversal is attributed to multiple factors: potential short-selling bans and market stabilization measures from South Korea, significant leverage unwinding (with leveraged ETF assets down ~70% from peaks), cooler-than-expected US inflation data easing rate hike fears, and a stellar Microsoft earnings report showing strong cloud/AI demand growth. Microsoft's results, highlighting Azure revenue crossing $100 billion, helped counter the "AI bubble burst" narrative that had pressured the sector. However, the article cautions against declaring a sustained bull market. Key risks remain, including potential further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan, which could pressure global carry trades, and unanswered questions about whether high industry profits can be maintained amid the supply cycle and new competition. Investors are advised to monitor whether gains hold, watch for updates on HBM/DRAM/NAND pricing and orders, and await key upcoming events like NVIDIA's earnings. The conclusion emphasizes disciplined investing—avoiding panic selling or FOMO buying—and using strategies like hedging to manage risk in this volatile environment.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot