Android Flaw Leaves 30 Million Crypto Wallets Open To Attack: Microsoft Analysts

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-04-11Actualizado a 2026-04-11

Resumen

Microsoft analysts revealed a critical security flaw in the EngageLab SDK (v4.5.4), leaving over 30 million Android crypto wallets vulnerable to attack. The "intent redirection" vulnerability allowed a malicious app to bypass Android's sandbox and gain read/write access to a wallet's private data, including seed phrases and keys, without any user interaction. A patch (SDK 5.2.1) was released in mid-2025. Users who haven't updated their apps since then are advised to not only update but also move their funds to new wallets with fresh seed phrases, as any unpatched wallet is considered compromised. The flaw also affected over 50 million apps in total.

A patch has been available for nearly a year, but millions of Android users may still be running vulnerable crypto wallet apps — leaving their funds and private keys exposed to a known security flaw.

Microsoft’s Defender Security Research Team went public last week with details of a vulnerability it first caught in April 2025. The flaw lived inside a widely used software component called the EngageLab SDK, version 4.5.4.

Because that SDK is baked into thousands of Android apps, a single malicious app could trigger a chain reaction that reached far beyond itself.

How The Attack Works

The method is called “intent redirection.” An attacker’s app sends a specially crafted message to any app running the flawed SDK version. Once that message lands, the targeted app is tricked into handing over read and write access to its own data — including stored seed phrases and wallet addresses.

Source: Microsoft

Android’s built-in sandbox system, which normally keeps apps from seeing each other’s data, was bypassed entirely. According to Microsoft, the attack affected more than 50 million apps across the Android ecosystem, with roughly 30 million of those being crypto wallets.

The vulnerability did not require the user to do anything wrong. No suspicious links. No phishing pages. Just having the wrong apps installed at the same time was enough.

Source: Microsoft

Response From Microsoft And Google

Microsoft moved quickly after its discovery. By May 2025, the company had brought Google and the Android Security Team into the response. EngageLab released a fixed version — SDK 5.2.1 — shortly after.

Reports indicate that both Microsoft and Google have since directed users on how to verify whether their wallet apps have been updated through Google Play Protect.

BTCUSD trading at $72,906 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Officials also pointed to a broader concern: apps installed as APK files from outside the Play Store are at higher risk, since they bypass the security checks that Google applies to apps listed in its official marketplace.

What Users Should Do Now

For most users who update their apps regularly, the risk has likely passed. But for anyone who has not updated since mid-2025, the recommended action goes beyond a simple app refresh.

Security teams are advising those users to move their funds into entirely new wallets, generated with fresh seed phrases. Any wallet that was active and unpatched during the exposure window should be treated as potentially compromised.

The disclosure comes alongside a separate Android chip vulnerability flagged the previous month and a new US Treasury initiative that pairs government agencies with crypto firms to share cybersecurity threat information — a sign that mobile security in the crypto space is drawing attention at the highest levels.

Featured image from Bleeping Computer, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the vulnerable software component and which version was affected?

AThe vulnerable software component is the EngageLab SDK, specifically version 4.5.4.

QWhat is the attack method called and how does it work?

AThe attack method is called 'intent redirection.' A malicious app sends a specially crafted message to an app running the flawed SDK, tricking it into granting read and write access to its own data, including seed phrases and wallet addresses.

QHow many crypto wallet apps were estimated to be affected by this vulnerability?

ARoughly 30 million crypto wallet apps were estimated to be affected.

QWhat is the primary action recommended for users who had an unpatched wallet app?

AUsers are advised to move their funds into entirely new wallets generated with fresh seed phrases, as the old wallet should be treated as potentially compromised.

QWhich two major companies collaborated on the response to this vulnerability after its discovery?

AMicrosoft and Google (specifically the Android Security Team) collaborated on the response.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片