American Federation Of Teachers Opposes Crypto Market Structure Bill In New Letter

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-12-11Actualizado a 2025-12-11

Resumen

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has formally opposed a proposed crypto market structure bill, urging the Senate Banking Committee to reconsider the legislation. In a letter, AFT President Randi Weingarten called the bill “irresponsible” and “reckless,” warning it could endanger pension funds and retirement plans like 401(k)s by exposing them to volatile and potentially fraudulent crypto assets. She highlighted a provision allowing non-crypto companies to issue stock on blockchain, bypassing existing securities regulations, which could lead to “disastrous outcomes.” The AFT’s opposition aligns with concerns from other groups, including the AFL-CIO and several Democratic senators, who fear the bill may weaken investor protections and potentially trigger another financial crisis. Progress on the bill has been delayed, but a new draft is expected for review soon.

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has formally added its voice to the growing opposition against the proposed crypto market structure bill, urging the Senate Banking Committee to reconsider the legislation.

In a letter obtained by CNBC, AFT President Randi Weingarten described the bill as “as irresponsible as it is reckless,” citing the alleged dangers it poses to working families’ pensions and the overall economy.

AFT Calls Out Loopholes In Crypto Legislation

In her correspondence with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, who is known for her consistent skepticism toward digital assets, Weingarten expressed significant concern about the implications of the proposed legislation.

She stated that the current draft gives the AFT “deep concern” over the risks posed to retirement plans, including the union’s own pensions. Weingarten argued that advancing the crypto legislation could open the door to “widespread fraud” and “unethical practices” within retirement schemes.

Weingarten alleged that the bill “misleadingly” portrays cryptocurrencies as stable and mainstream, despite their volatility. She argued that rather than providing necessary safeguards. “If passed, it will undercut the safety of many assets and cause problems across retirement investments,” she noted.

Among the specific concerns raised by the AFT was a provision allowing non-crypto companies to issue their stock on the blockchain, thus evading existing regulatory frameworks for securities.

Weingarten warned that this loophole and the corresponding erosion of traditional securities laws could have “disastrous outcomes.” She noted that pensions and 401(k) plans may end up invested in unsafe assets, even when they are nominally traditional securities.

Additionally, she criticized the legislation for inadequately addressing the fraud and illegal activities that Weingarten believes remain prevalent in crypto markets, labeling it “irresponsible” and “reckless.”

Delays And Heightened Concerns

In the letter, Weingarten also stressed that if the bill were to become law, it could potentially set the stage for the next financial crisis. The AFT’s stance aligns with concerns previously expressed by the AFL-CIO, the nation’s largest labor union, which also opposed a draft of the crypto bill in October.

In line with Weingarten’s opposition, Democratic senators, including Warren, have raised concerns regarding the balance of regulatory oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin reiterated these concerns in a letter, highlighting that the proposed legislation could exclude significant portions of the financial industry from state oversight, creating risks for millions of savers.

Progress on the Senate’s version of the crypto market structure bill has faced delays, partly attributed to the recent lengthiest government shutdown in US history.

Senator Lummis recently provided insight into potential timelines, indicating that her goal is to share a new draft by the end of the week. She plans to allow both the crypto industry and lawmakers from both parties to review the draft before moving forward with markup next week.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation currently at $3.12 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) opposes the crypto market structure bill?

AThe AFT opposes the bill because it believes the legislation is irresponsible and reckless, posing significant risks to working families' pensions and the overall economy by potentially opening the door to widespread fraud and unethical practices within retirement schemes.

QAccording to AFT President Randi Weingarten, what specific loophole in the bill could allow non-crypto companies to evade existing regulations?

AThe bill contains a provision that would allow non-crypto companies to issue their stock on the blockchain, thus evading existing regulatory frameworks for securities.

QWhich two major US regulatory agencies' balance of oversight is a point of concern for Democratic senators regarding this bill?

ADemocratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren, have raised concerns regarding the balance of regulatory oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

QWhat potential consequence does the AFT warn could occur if this crypto bill becomes law?

AThe AFT warns that if the bill becomes law, it could potentially set the stage for the next financial crisis.

QWhich other large labor union had previously expressed opposition to a draft of this crypto bill, as mentioned in the article?

AThe AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor union, also opposed a draft of the crypto bill in October.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Former Huawei "Genius Youth" Li Bojie recently drew public attention by criticizing his interview experience with DeepSeek. The controversy escalated when Du Jun, co-founder of Web3 investment firm ABCDE Capital, publicly accused Li of being "the founder with the least sense of contractual spirit" he had ever cooperated with, sparking a dispute over Li's startup project, Metagent. Li detailed a frustrating DeepSeek interview where he was accused of potential plagiarism, leading him to end the session. The spotlight then shifted to his venture, Metagent, a Web3+AI project aiming to tokenize AI agents. ABCDE invested $1.5 million, with an initial $500k disbursed. Du Jun claimed the project's progress was severely lacking, with a poor-quality demo and minimal social media activity. He alleged Li stopped communicating, deleted his Telegram, and failed to provide proper financial reporting. In response, Li argued the remaining $1 million was never received, crippling operations and forcing salary cuts. He stated he left Metagent in October 2024 due to family reasons and Web3 compliance concerns, with board approval. He claimed to have fulfilled disclosure duties and that his subsequent projects avoided conflicting fields. Other investors, including ArkStream Capital, shared negative due diligence experiences, citing unprofessional contracts and evasive answers on tokenomics. Metagent's social media went silent in June 2024, effectively stalling. Li has since moved to a new consumer AI agent platform, Pine AI (formerly Logenic AI), which has raised $25 million in Series A funding. He served as its Chief Scientist but recently left, clarifying he was not the founder and departed due to a shift in research interests.

Foresight NewsHace 21 min(s)

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Foresight NewsHace 21 min(s)

SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's Q3 Profit to Exceed $1 Billion

Research firm SemiAnalysis reveals that Anthropic is reshaping the AI commercialization landscape with profitability and growth rates far exceeding competitors. Leveraging a high-margin, API-centric business model, Anthropic has become a leader in the B2B AI market. The report projects that Anthropic will achieve a GAAP EBIT of $1 billion in Q3 2026, with a 6% margin. Its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) has surged from $9 billion at the end of 2025 to over $60 billion currently. If it maintains a Net New ARR (NNARR) of approximately $15 billion per month, its ARR could reach $300 billion by the end of 2027, implying a $6 trillion enterprise value and making it the world's most valuable company. Anthropic secretly filed for an IPO on June 1st. SemiAnalysis argues the timing is strategically urgent due to narrowing capital market windows as rivals like Alphabet and Meta secure major funding. The superior financials and business model suggest Anthropic should go public before OpenAI to seize the competitive initiative. The performance inflection stems from the explosive adoption of Claude Code, which now accounts for over 7% of all GitHub commits, driving monthly NNARR from $3 billion in January to $11 billion in March. Anthropic's revenue structure differs significantly from OpenAI's. Approximately 75-85% of Anthropic's ARR comes from usage-based API fees, with consumer subscriptions constituting only about 5%. In contrast, over 65% of OpenAI's Q1 2026 revenue was from subscriptions, with ~40% from consumers. The API model's key advantage is no per-user revenue cap, enabling growth within existing accounts. Anthropic's Net Revenue Retention (NRR) is an extraordinary 500%. This drives superior gross margins, now in the mid-60% range versus -94% in 2024, with API margins exceeding 80%. Core drivers are improved inference efficiency and a largely enterprise-focused model without the cost of serving hundreds of millions of free users. The report introduces "EBTIT" (Earnings Before Training & Interest & Taxes) to measure re-investment capacity, projecting Anthropic's cumulative EBTIT through 2028 will be $250 billion higher than OpenAI's. Over 65% of lab ARR currently comes from programming use cases. Cybersecurity is seen as the next major vertical, with upcoming model releases like Fable expected to further increase token pricing and expand NNARR. Indirect sales via hyperscaler platforms (AWS Bedrock, Azure Foundry) now account for 15-20% of ARR. A core constraint is compute supply. By 2030, combined unconstrained compute demand from Anthropic and OpenAI could exceed 100 GW, far outstripping projected new capacity. IPO proceeds are seen as crucial to lock in future compute resources. Key risks include potential price cuts by OpenAI, competitive pressure from Google DeepMind and Meta in coding models, potential government restrictions on frontier model releases, and margin dilution from growing indirect "Token-as-a-Service" sales. Regulatory actions that narrow the capability gap between open-source and proprietary models are highlighted as a fundamental threat to Anthropic's moat.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's Q3 Profit to Exceed $1 Billion

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片