Altman Duped, A Company Steps on the Gas for IPO, Fundraising to Rival SpaceX

marsbitPublicado a 2026-09-14Actualizado a 2026-09-14

Resumen

Anthropic is reportedly accelerating its IPO plans despite CEO Dario Amodei's recent public calls for the AI industry to "slow down." According to Bloomberg, the AI company has chosen Nasdaq for its listing, targeting a launch as early as October. The fundraising goal is ambitious, aiming to match or surpass the record $86.3 billion raised by SpaceX's IPO in June. This move appears contradictory to Anthropic's safety advocacy. Shortly after Amodei's public letter, which was echoed by figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk, news of the aggressive IPO timeline emerged. Anthropic's valuation has skyrocketed, reaching approximately $965 billion after its May 2026 funding round, surpassing OpenAI. This growth is largely fueled by its success in AI coding tools, with annual recurring revenue reportedly soaring to over $65 billion. Meanwhile, Sam Altman's response to the safety debate is viewed by some as strategic. After publicly supporting Amodei's call, Altman gave an interview emphasizing that an IPO is not currently wise for OpenAI, positioning his company as the one most seriously considering long-term safety—a move seen as adeptly steering the narrative. The potential scale of Anthropic's IPO could significantly boost Nasdaq's total annual fundraising, further igniting market enthusiasm. The article highlights the intense competition and complex dynamics within the AI industry, where public safety stances and private business ambitions often collide.

Amazing.

After calling for everyone to hit the brakes, your A Company's IPO is still proceeding.

Bloomberg reported that Anthropic has chosen Nasdaq as its listing location, with plans to ring the bell as early as October this year.

You little rascal, after all this, you still want to use the nuclear option to inflate the valuation!!!

In terms of fundraising scale, it's also being incredibly ambitious, saying it needs to be at least on par with SpaceX.

Oh Elon, oh Elon, even you've become a unit of measurement one day...

A Company's Marketing Mastery

Your Dario is already lost in his own art, unable to extricate himself.

This weekend, A Company's signature move was deployed again. Dario posted a short essay calling for the AI industry to hit the brakes.

Who would have thought, hey, people actually paid attention. Altman and Musk all chimed in.

Your Nobel laureate Hassabis also quietly voiced support. It's just a shame that after Google lost Coding, old Hassabis basically carries little weight anymore. The position among the AI big three has long been replaced by old Musk.

But then the ridiculous moment arrived...

A Company was revealed to still be accelerating its IPO, aiming for as early as October this year.

On one hand shouting "AI is dangerous, slow down," on the other charging towards the "biggest IPO in history."

Well, that's A Company for you.

A Company's IPO Progress Bar

Let's look at the core info from this leak.

Listing location: Nasdaq.

Timeline: As early as October this year.

Fundraising scale: Aiming to match or even exceed SpaceX.

What does matching mean?

SpaceX just rang the bell on Nasdaq this June, raising a whopping $86.3 billion in one go, setting a historical record for US IPOs.

A Company's intention is to set another record.

Wait, what about hitting the brakes??

In terms of valuation, the previously rumored target was around $2 trillion.

That's already close to the market cap of established giants like Amazon and Meta.

I seriously suspect A Company can't tell left from right, confusing the gas and brake pedals.

Since focusing on Coding, A Company's funding progress has been like riding a rocket.

March 2025, Series E, post-money valuation $61.5 billion.

September 2025, Series F, $13 billion, valuation $183 billion.

February 2026, Series G, $30 billion, valuation $380 billion.

May 2026, Series H, $65 billion, post-money valuation $965 billion, surpassing OpenAI's $852 billion in one go to become the world's most valuable AI startup.

14 months, valuation increased nearly 16 times.

But to be fair, A Company's commercial prospects are indeed solid. By the end of July, ARR exceeded $65 billion, more than 7 times higher than at the end of last year.

Remember, at the beginning of 2025, that number was only $1 billion...

Programmers are just too good at generating gold, directly propelling A Company to the top, overtaking OpenAI.

Even so, A Company is still very cash-hungry.

AWS's decade-long commitment exceeding $100 billion, expanding TPU with Google and Broadcom, plus SpaceX's compute clusters—each one is a cash-devouring monster.

Compute power is indeed a bottomless pit, otherwise they probably wouldn't be in such a hurry to go public.

In contrast, OpenAI is the picture of laid-back relaxation.

Your cyber godfather Thibault, after Astra, who knows how many times he's reset, turning the Agent wars into a food delivery war...

Back to the IPO.

Looking at the broader market, A Company's listing will further ignite capital enthusiasm on Nasdaq.

The total IPO fundraising amount in the US stock market this year has reached $160.6 billion, the highest since 2021.

Nasdaq alone accounted for the 4 largest deals, including SpaceX and SK Hynix.

If Anthropic really pushes past $86.3 billion, it could boost that number significantly again.

One More Thing

Oh, one more thing.

A Company called for a pause in AI research this time, and OpenAI followed, right?

It left me dumbfounded.

Clearly finished with the disdain on stage, not even willing to shake hands, yet Altman played it so gracefully this time.

I thought we finally got the drama of a handshake truce to fight the big boss together.

But I see it clearly today.

Right after sharing Dario's blog post, Altman went on a Fortune interview.

It's definitely not wise to go public now.

We still have a lot of work to do. We need to be able to make decisions that, on the surface, don't seem to align with the company's or shareholders' interests.

???

Wait, I thought, judging from all the previous rumors, OpenAI never planned to go public this year anyway...

In seizing the main narrative.

In one move, sucking away all the traffic from supporting A Company's PR stunt, making OpenAI seem like the most safety-conscious.

Tsk tsk tsk, still too naive, Dario.

Did you forget how your Sam brother played Musk for a fool back in the day?

Reference links:

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-13/anthropic-said-to-choose-nasdaq-for-much-anticipated-ipo-listing

[2] https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-ipo-sam-altman-ai-safety-concerns-2026-9

This article is from the WeChat public account "QbitAI", author: Focus on Frontier Technology

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat key details about Anthropic's IPO were revealed by Bloomberg according to the article?

AAccording to the article citing Bloomberg, Anthropic has chosen Nasdaq as its IPO listing location, plans to go public as early as October of this year, and aims for a fundraising scale at least matching SpaceX's record-breaking $86.3 billion IPO.

QWhat contradiction does the article highlight in Anthropic's recent actions?

AThe article points out the contradiction between Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei publicly calling for the AI industry to 'hit the brakes' on development for safety, while simultaneously accelerating the company's own plans for a massive, record-setting IPO.

QHow has Anthropic's valuation and revenue changed recently based on the article's data?

AAnthropic's valuation skyrocketed from $61.5 billion in March 2025 to $965 billion in May 2026, a nearly 16-fold increase in 14 months. Its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) grew from $1 billion in early 2025 to over $65 billion by late July 2026.

QWhat reason does Sam Altman of OpenAI give in the article for *not* pursuing an IPO now?

AIn a Fortune interview cited in the article, Sam Altman states that pursuing an IPO now is 'not the wise move' because OpenAI has a lot of work to do and needs the ability to make decisions that may not appear to serve immediate corporate or shareholder interests.

QWhat is the article's final critique regarding the interaction between Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman on the safety issue?

AThe article's final critique suggests that Sam Altman outmaneuvered Dario Amodei. By publicly supporting the 'safety pause' call and then giving an interview emphasizing OpenAI's long-term caution over an IPO, Altman captured the public narrative, making OpenAI appear as the most safety-conscientious company, while Anthropic seemed contradictory with its own IPO push.

Lecturas Relacionadas

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

This weekly analysis examines the recent price action of Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, focusing on key technical developments and outlining potential trading strategies. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** * **Market Trend Assessment:** The analysis applies a "52-week moving average confirmation method" to assess the broader trend. While BTC's weekly closing price has broken above this key average, the moving average itself remains in a downtrend, and a proper pullback confirmation is still lacking. The conclusion is that the rally from the July 1st low is still classified as a technical rebound, not yet confirming a new bull market. * **Daily Chart Structure:** The report argues that the five-wave rally (a-e) from the July low likely concluded at the September 21st high. The recent breakdown below the key support of $82,500, followed by a weak-volume rebound, supports this view. If the e-wave is complete, a larger corrective decline (potentially in three sub-waves) is anticipated. The first leg of this correction is underway, with an initial target around $78,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The focus is on the downside targets from the September 21st high. Key resistance is seen at $85,500 and the $87,500-$90,000 zone. Support levels are identified at $80,500-$82,500, $75,000-$78,000, and $69,100-$70,500. * **Strategy:** The medium-term posture is neutral/cautious, recommending watching for a potential pullback to a "channel" for confirmation. For short-term traders, two scenarios are outlined: (A) Selling into strength near the $85,500-$87,500 resistance if bearish signals appear, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the $80,500-$82,500 support zone. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss management is advised. **HYPE Analysis:** * **Daily Chart Structure:** HYPE broke below the lower boundary of its two-month ascending channel on October 8th. Price is currently in a "pullback confirmation" phase, testing this breached support-turned-resistance. A failure to reclaim this level would signal weakness and open the path towards the $75-$77 support area. The longer-term uptrend line, however, remains intact. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The critical watchpoint is the outcome of the current test of the former channel support. Resistance levels are noted at $88-$90, $94, and $102. Key support zones are $80-$82 and $75-$77. * **Strategy:** Two bullish scenarios are proposed for short-term trades: (1) A light long position if price convincingly reclaims and holds above the former channel support, or (2) A light long position if price falls to the $75-$77 support area and shows signs of stabilization. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **Risk Management Reminder:** The article includes a standard trailing stop-loss protocol (moving stop to breakeven at +1% profit, then locking in profits progressively). It strongly cautions that all analysis is for informational purposes only, not investment advice, and strategies must be adapted to changing market conditions.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

A U.S. defense procurement rule set to take effect in January 2027, which aims to exclude printed circuit boards (PCBs) from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, has sparked debate within the American industry. While the policy, stemming from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, is intended to bolster U.S. domestic manufacturing and supply chain security, it faces conflicting pressures. The U.S. PCB industry association (PCBAA) urges swift implementation to redirect defense contracts to local manufacturers. In contrast, technology industry groups like the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) seek a longer transition period, citing high costs and complexities for companies needing to establish new, certified supply lines and production facilities. The rule's direct impact on China's vast PCB industry is estimated to be minimal, affecting less than 1% of its total demand. However, it highlights a broader U.S. strategy to revive advanced electronics manufacturing through defense contracts, tax credits, and subsidies. Despite these efforts, rebuilding a competitive domestic PCB industry faces significant hurdles, including multi-year factory construction timelines, reliance on overseas materials and equipment, and the challenge of achieving commercial scale without sufficient non-defense orders. Notably, even U.S. defense contractors like TTM continue to expand production capacity in China to leverage its mature, cost-effective supply chain. Meanwhile, China's PCB sector is transitioning from scale to technological sophistication, making significant inroads in high-end areas like AI servers and advanced packaging. Leading Chinese firms are achieving breakthroughs in materials and complex multi-layer board production, supported by a deep industrial ecosystem of suppliers, manufacturers, and end-client collaboration. This entrenched system of scale, iterative development, and integrated supply chains represents a competitive advantage that U.S. policy alone cannot quickly replicate. The core challenge for the U.S. is not merely redirecting orders but rebuilding the comprehensive manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability that have shifted overseas.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar GAS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar GAS (GAS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar GAS (GAS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu GAS (GAS)Después de comprar tu GAS (GAS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear GAS (GAS)Tradear fácilmente con GAS (GAS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

658 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar GAS

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de GAS (GAS).

活动图片