Altcoin Network Hacked, Putting Three Days of Transactions at Risk! Exchanges Halt Trading!

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-11Actualizado a 2026-08-11

Resumen

The Ravencoin (RVN) network, a Proof-of-Work altcoin, has been hacked due to a critical consensus vulnerability. Attackers created invalid blocks, with the first known one appearing on August 7, 2026. This could force a deep blockchain reorganization, potentially rolling back transactions from up to three days. Major mining pools have started mining an alternative chain to exclude the hacked branch. If this chain becomes dominant, it could revert the network to its pre-August 7 state, risking the reversal of exchange deposits and withdrawals. The Ravencoin team has advised exchanges to temporarily halt RVN deposits and withdrawals. Exchanges like Bithumb and Upbit have suspended RVN transactions and issued warnings. Following the news, the price of RVN dropped approximately 20%.

Amid ongoing hacker attacks in the cryptocurrency market, hackers have this time targeted Ravencoin ($RVN), an altcoin based on the Proof-of-Work algorithm.

In this instance, hackers created invalid blocks in the Ravencoin ($RVN) network. The Ravencoin team confirmed the hack, explaining that a critical consensus vulnerability in the network was exploited, causing some nodes to accept invalid blocks.

Although the attackers managed to create invalid blocks using the vulnerability they discovered, the first known invalid block in the network, according to an official Ravencoin statement, appeared on August 7, 2026, at 15:44:01 UTC and had a height of 4,487,776.

This negative development raised concerns that the network might face a blockchain reorganization so deep that transactions from approximately the last three days would need to be reversed.

According to the statement, mining pools 2Miners and RavenMiner currently control the majority of the network's hash rate and have begun mining on an alternate chain, excluding the hacked branch, starting from block height 4,487,776. If the miners, who are said to dominate the network, decide to let this alternate chain become dominant, the chain could be rolled back four days, returning to a state prior to August 7, the date the attack began.

Such a large-scale reorganization could mean removing certain transactions from the blockchain's history and re-executing them. This, consequently, poses a significant risk, especially for exchange deposit and withdrawal operations.

Therefore, the Ravencoin team recommended that exchanges temporarily suspend $RVN deposits and withdrawals until the network stabilizes.

The project also reported that transactions confirmed after block number 4,487,775 should be considered risky.

Consequently, exchanges such as Bithumb and Upbit have temporarily suspended $RVN deposit and withdrawal operations. They also stated that $RVN received a warning.

The vulnerability in the network's security system and the potential reorganization risk directly impacted the price of $RVN. The price of Ravencoin fell by approximately 20% within minutes of the news spreading.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich specific altcoin network was targeted by hackers according to the article?

AThe Ravencoin (RVN) network, an altcoin based on the Proof-of-Work algorithm, was targeted by hackers.

QWhat was the core issue that allowed the hack on the Ravencoin network to happen?

AThe hack was possible due to a critical consensus vulnerability in the Ravencoin network, which caused some nodes to accept invalid blocks created by the attackers.

QWhat potential consequence does the article mention regarding blockchain history?

AThe article mentions the potential for a deep blockchain reorganization (reorg), which could require rolling back transactions from approximately the last three days, effectively removing and re-executing them.

QWhat action did the Ravencoin team recommend for cryptocurrency exchanges?

AThe Ravencoin team recommended that exchanges temporarily suspend RVN deposits and withdrawals until the network stabilizes.

QWhat immediate market impact did the news of the hack have on the price of RVN?

AThe price of Ravencoin (RVN) dropped by approximately 20% within minutes after the news of the hack spread.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

The article analyzes the apparent failure of HyperEVM, the application engine of the Hyperliquid blockchain, contrasting it with the success of its core trading engine, HyperCore. Hyperliquid operates on a dual-engine architecture. HyperCore is a closed, high-performance order-book exchange for perpetuals and spot trading, which dominates on-chain volume and generates massive fees. HyperEVM, launched in February 2025, is an EVM-compatible layer meant for DeFi applications like lending and DEXs, which can access HyperCore's liquidity. Despite Hyperliquid's overall strength in a bear market, a stark divergence exists: * **HyperCore (Trading):** Captures over half of on-chain perpetual volume, generating ~$56M in fees over 30 days. * **HyperEVM (Applications):** All DeFi protocols combined generate less than $60M in fees. TVL is shrinking, daily active addresses are low (~8k), and the ecosystem lacks diversity. The DEX sector is particularly anemic, with most volume concentrated in a single protocol. The article identifies four key reasons for HyperEVM's struggles: 1. **Core Monopoly on Execution:** HyperCore exclusively handles order matching. This makes native DEXs on HyperEVM redundant and limits viable applications to those leveraging its order book (e.g., staking, lending). 2. **Architectural Concentration:** Shared liquidity across interfaces naturally leads to a "winner-takes-most" outcome, explaining the high concentration in both the trading (e.g., trade.xyz) and application layers. 3. **"No Insider" Philosophy:** Hyperliquid's commitment to fair launch means it provides no grants, business development, or marketing support to ecosystem projects, stunting growth. 4. **Complex Developer Experience:** The asynchronous design between HyperEVM and HyperCore (via the CoreWriter contract) creates non-standard development hurdles, as EVM transactions don't roll back if the core action fails. The conclusion is that HyperEVM's weakness is a deliberate trade-off, not an accident. Hyperliquid prioritized building an unbeatable trading engine, sacrificing the development of a broad, independent application ecosystem. HyperEVM functions more as a tokenization layer for HyperCore's liquidity rather than a general-purpose chain. The debate isn't whether it's "dead"—it serves a niche—but whether Hyperliquid ever intended to build a thriving, diverse DeFi ecosystem beyond its core trading product.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Hyperliquid is Strongly Strangling HyperEVM

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

SuperPure Applied Materials (Stock Code: 301717) debuted on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext board. The company issued 25.4615 million shares at an offering price of 65.99 yuan per share, raising approximately 1.68 billion yuan. The stock opened at 450 yuan, soaring 582% from the IPO price, and closed at 503 yuan, up 662%, giving the company a market capitalization of 51.2 billion yuan. The company specializes in special coating processes and related technologies and materials, providing precision components and services for the semiconductor manufacturing and precision optics sectors. Its products cover core equipment parts for wafer fabrication, packaging, and silicon wafer manufacturing, with notable technical advantages in etching, lithography, measurement/inspection, annealing, and thin-film deposition equipment. Financially, SuperPure reported revenues of 169 million, 260 million, and 496 million yuan for 2023, 2024, and 2025 respectively, with corresponding net profits of 64.8 million, 82.26 million, and 185 million yuan. For Q1 2026, revenue reached 147 million yuan, a 62% year-over-year increase. The company forecasts H1 2026 revenue between 270 to 290 million yuan and net profit between 103 to 110 million yuan. The company's controlling shareholder and actual controller is Chai Jie, who directly and indirectly controls 48.23% of the voting rights. Together with his brother Chai Lin, a concerted action person, they control a total of 68.84% of the voting rights. Major pre-IPO shareholders included GSD Venture Capital, BYD, and AMEC.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

UltraPure Applied Materials Lists on Shenzhen Stock Exchange: Annual Revenue of 5 Billion, Post-Adjustment Net Profit of 2 Billion, Market Cap of 51.2 Billion

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, is facing accusations of insolvency and withdrawal issues, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse. Despite announcing a gradual wind-down until January 2027 and assuring users they could withdraw assets, reports emerged of significant problems shortly after. On-chain analysts noted unusually low withdrawal volumes, with some users reporting failed or stuck transactions. BitMart's CEO, Sheldon Xia, eventually broke the company's silence on August 8, 2026, claiming the team was consolidating assets for an orderly shutdown and denied misappropriating funds, mentioning potential court and auditor involvement. However, new complaints arose. A user named BeardStaff claimed $10.1 million was stuck, while Matthew Wang, co-founder of market maker OpenGradient, accused BitMart of insolvency, noting his firm's funds were also trapped. Wang highlighted a suspicious offer from BitMart for high-yield, locked staking just a week before the closure announcement. Numerous other users reported being unable to withdraw sums ranging from thousands to millions of dollars. Several crypto projects, including Gen6, Paxi Network, and Scandic Coin, are pursuing legal action. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows BitMart's wallet holdings have plummeted from over $100 million in early July 2026 to around $36.4 million, while CoinMarketCap data indicates reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in BitMart's native BMX token.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

cryptonews.ruHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片