All about Aave Labs’ ‘token-centric’ plan to direct 100% revenue to DAO

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-14Actualizado a 2026-02-14

Resumen

Aave Labs has proposed a "token-centric" framework to direct 100% of revenue from all Aave-branded products, including Aave.com and its mobile app, to the Aave DAO. In return, it requested $50 million from the DAO to fund development. CEO Stani Kulechov stated this model positions Aave for long-term growth as DeFi and TradFi converge. However, the proposal faced criticism from the DAO, with member Marc Zeller calling it a potential "extraction" of funds and demanding further audits and clarifications. The ongoing governance dispute, which previously caused significant token volatility, remains unresolved despite a temporary ceasefire in January.

The Aave Labs-DAO ceasefire in January is being tested. Aave Labs, one of the ecosystem service providers (SPs), announced an “Aave will win” framework to direct 100% product revenue to the DAO.

According to the proposal, revenue generated from all Aave-branded products, including Aave.com, Aave mobile app, Aave Card, and Aave Horizon (a tokenization platform), amongst others, will be channeled to the DAO.

For his part, Aave Labs CEO and founder Stani Kulechov said,

“The framework formalizes Aave Labs’ role as a long-term contributor to the Aave DAO under a token-centric model, with 100% of product revenue directed to the DAO.”

As DeFi and TradFi merge, Kulechov added that “this framework positions Aave to capture major growth markets and win over the next decade.”

In return, Aave Labs has requested $50 million, including 75,000 AAVE coins, from the DAO to fund development of these products. It argued that the revenue streams it currently relies on to do the work would be directed to the DAO.

Additionally, the SP proposed the formation of a Foundation to handle and manage Aave brands, arguing that the DAO isn’t a legal entity capable of undertaking such a responsibility.

DAO slams Aave Labs proposal as ‘extraction’

For the unfamiliar, the DAO is the collective governing entity representing tokenholders and tasked with directing and funding ecosystem developments carried out by SPs.

The governance spat between the two entities spiraled in late 2025 following accusations that Aave Labs stole DAO revenues for personal use. Additionally, the DAO demanded control over all Aave brands, claiming that Aave Labs had sidestepped it.

At that time, AAVE token’s price dropped from $200 to nearly $140, wiping significant market value as the crisis deepened. However, relief came after a ceasefire in January, when Aave Labs promised a proposal aligned with token holders.

Alas, the DAO, led by vocal member Marc Zeller, remains unhappy with Aave Labs’ demands and certain aspects of the proposal.

In a statement, Zeller said the proposal was a win for the DAO but retorted,

“Aave Labs is back with a $50M ‘solution’, presented as ‘for the good of the DAO’, after zero prior coordination with delegates or service providers. At this point, the fox controls the henhouse, and the incentive is clearly to maximize extraction.”

He asked for further clarification and an audit on Aave Labs’ income streams to verify the “100% revenue” commitment.

In other words, the governance issue may still be far from being resolved. For its part, AAVE surged by about 7% after the update. However, if the governance crisis escalates again, it could drop to $79 or lower.


Final Thoughts

  • Aave Labs has agreed to direct 100% of product revenue from Aave-related brands back to the DAO.
  • However, the DAO disagreed with Aave Labs’ $50 million demand, signaling that the governance crisis may continue.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main proposal announced by Aave Labs regarding revenue distribution?

AAave Labs announced a 'token-centric' framework to direct 100% of the product revenue from all Aave-branded products to the Aave DAO.

QWhat funding has Aave Labs requested from the DAO in return for directing all revenue?

AAave Labs has requested $50 million, including 75,000 AAVE coins, from the DAO to fund the development of its products.

QWhy did Marc Zeller criticize Aave Labs' proposal?

AMarc Zeller criticized the proposal as an 'extraction' and expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of prior coordination with delegates or service providers, calling it a move to maximize extraction rather than benefit the DAO.

QWhat was the impact of the previous governance crisis on the AAVE token price?

ADuring the previous governance crisis in late 2025, the price of AAVE dropped from $200 to nearly $140, wiping out significant market value.

QWhat additional structure did Aave Labs propose to handle Aave brands, and why?

AAave Labs proposed the formation of a Foundation to handle and manage Aave brands, arguing that the DAO is not a legal entity capable of undertaking such responsibilities.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar DAO

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar DAO Maker (DAO) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu DAO Maker (DAO)Después de comprar tu DAO Maker (DAO), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear DAO Maker (DAO)Tradear fácilmente con DAO Maker (DAO) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

180 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar DAO

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de DAO (DAO).

活动图片