After the Crypto Craze, What Is Changpeng Zhao Thinking?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-27Actualizado a 2026-01-27

Resumen

In the post-crypto boom era, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) is shifting focus from short-term price speculation to long-term structural cycles, regulation, and government engagement. Speaking at Davos 2026, CZ avoided making specific price predictions but suggested Bitcoin could reach new highs in 2026 due to increasingly favorable regulatory environments, particularly in the U.S. and other countries. He revealed he is now acting as an unofficial coordinator between governments and the crypto industry, engaging with over a dozen countries on topics like regulatory frameworks, asset tokenization, and stablecoin design. CZ explicitly denied having any personal or business ties with Donald Trump, emphasizing that policy benefits are industry-wide, not personal. A key insight from his talk was the ongoing friction between traditional banking and crypto, with stablecoins serving as a temporary bridge. CZ’s evolution from a disruptive exchange CEO to a policy dialogue participant signals a broader industry shift from "price narrative" to "institution narrative." The new cycle is expected to be slower, longer, and more structured, driven by regulatory clarity and institutional maturity rather than mere market speculation.

Author: 137Labs

As the crypto market gradually cools and the narrative shifts toward long-term structures, the recent statements by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao provide a noteworthy perspective. This article does not focus on short-term price predictions but instead analyzes how he has shifted the discussion toward more macro variables such as cycles, governments, regulation, and time, based on his recent remarks at Davos. Through this shift, the article attempts to answer a more critical question: After the crypto craze, what stage has the industry truly entered?

At Davos, Changpeng Zhao (CZ) appeared more cautious than ever before.

The founder and former CEO of Binance no longer leads the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. Yet, at the 2026 World Economic Forum, he remained a figure of interest for the media and policy circles.

The reason lies not in any radical price predictions he offered—quite the opposite, he almost deliberately avoided short-term judgments.

I. He No Longer Predicts Prices, But Talks About "Time"

In an interview with CNBC, when asked about Bitcoin's price, Changpeng Zhao's response was surprisingly conservative:

Short-term prices are almost impossible to predict.

But immediately after, he offered a more macro judgment—

The cryptocurrency market may be entering a structural cycle that lasts for years.

In his description, this is not a traditional bull-bear switch but more of a change in cycle patterns.

He mentioned that Bitcoin historically fluctuated in four-year cycles, but this pattern is now being influenced by changes in the policy environment.

II. Why Might This Cycle Be Different?

The core reason Zhao gave was not technological upgrades or the halving narrative, but politics and regulatory environment.

He pointed out:

· The U.S. attitude toward cryptocurrency is becoming more friendly

· Other countries are quickly following suit with similar policies

· Crypto assets are gradually being incorporated into a "regulatable, discussable" category

In this context, he believes:

Bitcoin could reach a new all-time high in 2026.

However, it's important to note that this is not a statement of bullishness but more of a judgment on a policy-driven cycle.

III. "I Am in Dialogue with About a Dozen Governments"

More noteworthy than his price predictions is Zhao's main focus now.

He revealed in the interview that he is in communication with about a dozen governments, discussing key topics including:

· Cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks

· Asset tokenization

· The design and issuance of stablecoins

This stands in stark contrast to his earlier image of "innovate first, regulate later."

Today, he更像是一名:

Unofficial coordinator navigating between governments and the crypto industry.

IV. Regarding Trump, He Chose a "Clarification with Distance"

As U.S. politics increasingly influences the crypto industry, speculation about the relationship between Changpeng Zhao and Donald Trump has frequently surfaced.

To this, he gave a very clear response:

· He has never met Trump in person

· There is no close personal or business relationship

· The so-called "relationship" stems more from overlapping policy environments

In his explanation, the logic is very clear:

Policy benefits are at the industry level, not the result of personal relationships.

V. An Easily Overlooked Detail:

Why "Bypass the Banks"?

When discussing a Binance-related investment completed using a $1 stablecoin, Zhao added a thought-provoking detail:

The only requirement for using cryptocurrency was to avoid dealing with the banking system.

This statement highlights a practical issue:

Even as regulation becomes clearer, structural friction still exists between the traditional financial system and the crypto industry.

And stablecoins are becoming a temporary solution to bridge the two.

VI. Why Are Governments Becoming the Decisive Variable in the New Cycle?

In the early crypto narrative, governments were often seen as external disruptions, with cycles driven primarily by technological breakthroughs and market sentiment.

But today, that logic is fading.

As crypto assets are incorporated into formal regulatory frameworks, the market's focus shifts from "can it be done" to "how to do it, and under what system." When rules begin to be systematically designed, cycles are no longer solely determined by risk appetite but start to be influenced by the pace of institutional progress.

Regulatory clarity, compliance paths, and the confirmation of legal status do not immediately drive up prices, but they reshape long-term expectations, attracting institutional capital and national-level projects.

In this context, the new cycle is likely to be slower, longer, and more restrained.

Extreme bubbles decrease, while infrastructure and institutions gradually take shape.

If the early crypto cycles relied on imagination, the next phase seems more driven by policy patience and institutional maturity.

Conclusion:

CZ's Transformation Might Be More Important Than His Predictions

If one only extracts a few sentences, Zhao's remarks can easily be interpreted as price predictions.

But what is truly worth noting is his change.

From exchange CEO to industry advisor;

From resisting regulation to participating in institutional discussions;

From talking about coin prices to talking about time.

This perhaps signifies one thing:

The crypto industry is moving from "price narrative" to "institutional narrative."

And this time, the rhythm of the cycle may no longer be determined solely by the market.

This article represents the author's personal views only and does not constitute any investment, legal, or financial advice. The views are based on public information and are for discussion and reference only.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main shift in Zhao Changpeng's (CZ) focus according to the article?

ACZ has shifted his focus from short-term price predictions and a 'build first, regulate later' approach to engaging in macro-level discussions about cycles, government relations, and regulatory frameworks. He is now acting more as an unofficial coordinator between governments and the crypto industry.

QWhat reason does CZ give for why the current crypto market cycle might be different from previous ones?

ACZ states that the core reason is not technological upgrades or the 'halving' narrative, but the changing political and regulatory environment, particularly more friendly attitudes from the U.S. and other countries, which is integrating crypto into a 'governable and discussable' category.

QWhat detail does CZ provide about his relationship with former U.S. President Donald Trump?

ACZ explicitly clarifies that he has never met Donald Trump in person and that there is no close personal or business relationship. He attributes any perceived connection to an overlap in policy environments, not personal rapport.

QAccording to the article, what role is stablecoin playing in the current crypto landscape?

AStablecoins are serving as a temporary solution to bridge the structural friction that still exists between the traditional banking system and the crypto industry, allowing transactions to be settled without directly dealing with banks.

QWhat does the article suggest is the new primary driver of the crypto market's long-term cycle?

AThe article suggests that government policy, regulatory clarity, and institutional maturity are becoming the key long-term drivers, shifting the cycle from being driven by market speculation and imagination to being shaped by policy patience and the pace of regulatory development.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片