Actually, the Crypto Winter Began in January 2025

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

The crypto winter began in January 2025, though many only recently acknowledged it. Bitcoin and Ethereum have fallen 39% and 53% from their October 2025 peaks, with steeper declines for other assets. This is a full bear market, not a correction, driven by over-leverage and profit-taking. Positive developments like regulatory progress and institutional adoption have been ignored amid the downturn, typical of crypto winters where good news fails to lift prices. Historically, crypto winters last around 13 months. However, this one may be closer to ending than it appears, as it effectively started in January 2025. ETF and digital asset trust (DAT) inflows masked the reality for some assets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP saw milder declines (10–20%) due to institutional support, while assets like ADA, AVAX, SUI, and DOT fell 62–75% without such backing. Without $75 billion in ETF/DAT buying, Bitcoin’s drop would have been closer to 60%. The retail crypto market has been in winter since January 2025. Despite the gloom, fundamental strengths remain: regulatory clarity, institutional adoption, stablecoins, tokenization, and Wall Street embrace. These positive factors are stored energy that will fuel the next rally when sentiment shifts. Triggers could include strong economic growth, pro-crypto regulatory surprises, sovereign adoption of Bitcoin, or simply time. As with past winters, the end feels near—despair and frustration are common precursors to recovery. Spring is likely coming s...

Author:Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

We have been in a crypto winter since January 2025. It's likely that we are closer to the end of this winter than to its beginning.

We are in the midst of a full-blown crypto winter.

Crypto Twitter has only recently begun to realize this, but it is undeniable. Bitcoin is down 39% from its all-time high in October 2025, Ethereum is down 53%, and many other crypto assets have fallen even more.

This is not a "bull market correction" or a "slight dip." This is a full-blown, Leonardo DiCaprio-in-The-Revenant-(2012)-level crypto winter—caused by factors such as excessive leverage and widespread profit-taking by seasoned players.

Recognizing and accepting this is enlightening.

Why are crypto prices still falling despite positive news about adoption, regulation, and other areas? Because we are in the depths of a crypto winter.

Why is the new Fed Chair a Bitcoin supporter, yet the Crypto Fear & Greed Index is near historic highs? Because we are in a crypto winter.

Crypto investors who have lived through past winters (be it 2018 or 2022) should remember that at the deepest points of the winter, good news meant nothing. Wall Street hiring aggressively or Morgan Stanley increasing its crypto investments did not drive a crypto market rally. These factors might matter in the long run, but not now. The end of a crypto winter is not exciting; it is exhausting.

So, when will the winter end?

The good news is: We are closer to the end than you think.

The History of Crypto Winters

Crypto winters typically last about 13 months. For example, Bitcoin peaked in December 2017 and bottomed in December 2018. It peaked again in October 2021 and bottomed in November 2022.

By that measure, we are in for a tough time. After all, Bitcoin's peak was in October 2025. Are we really going to have to wait until next November to get back in?

I don't think so.

The more time I spend analyzing the current "winter," the more I realize it actually began in January 2025. It's just that ETF and Digital Asset Trust (DAT) flows masked the truth, preventing us from seeing it.

ETF and DAT Flows Masked the 2025 Winter

Take a closer look at this chart of the components of the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index since January 1, 2025.

It is divided into three clear groups. The first group of assets (BTC, ETH, XRP) performed okay, down 10.3% to 19.9%. The second group (SOL, LTC, LINK) experienced a standard bear market, down 36.9% to 46.2%. But the third group (ADA, AVAX, SUI, DOT) was hit hard, with declines as high as 61.9% to 74.7%.

The fundamental difference between these three groups lies in the ability of institutional investors to invest in them. The first group benefited from strong ETF/DAT support throughout the year (or, in the case of XRP, from winning its lawsuit against the SEC); the second group had ETFs expected to be approved in 20251; and the third group never received such support.

Look at what happened to the third group, which relied solely on crypto-native channels for support!

The institutional support received by the first group was unprecedented. For example, during the period shown in the chart, ETFs and DATs bought 744,417 bitcoins, worth approximately $75 billion. Imagine where Bitcoin would be without that $75 billion in support? I estimate it would be down about 60%.

The retail crypto market has been in a severe winter since January 2025. Institutional investors merely masked this fact for certain assets.

The Darkest Hour Is Just Before the Dawn

What needs to be remembered now is that there is indeed a lot of good news in the crypto space. Regulatory progress is real. Institutional adoption is real. Stablecoins and tokenization are real. Wall Street's acceptance is real.

Good news tends to be ignored in bear markets, but it doesn't disappear. It is stored as potential energy. When the gloom lifts and market sentiment returns to normal, this stored energy will return with a vengeance.

What can lift the gloom? Strong economic growth triggering a wave of aggressive risk-on sentiment, positive surprises from the Clarity Act, signs of Bitcoin recognition by sovereign nations, or simply the passage of time.

As a veteran of multiple crypto winters, I can tell you that the feeling at the end of those winters felt very much like it does now: despair, frustration, and listlessness. But the current market correction has not fundamentally changed anything about crypto.

I believe we will bounce back strongly soon. After all, if it has felt like winter from January 2025 until now, spring must surely be just around the corner.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, when did the crypto winter actually begin?

AThe crypto winter actually began in January 2025.

QWhat was the primary factor that masked the true start of the crypto winter in 2025?

AThe massive inflows into ETFs and Digital Asset Trusts (DATs) masked the true start of the crypto winter.

QHow are the assets in the article's 'third group' characterized, and what was their performance?

AThe third group (ADA, AVAX, SUI, DOT) consists of assets that never received institutional support like ETFs. They were hit the hardest, with declines ranging from 61.9% to 74.7%.

QWhat does the author suggest is the typical duration of a crypto winter, and why does he believe the current one might be different?

AThe typical duration is about 13 months. The author believes the current winter is different because it effectively started in January 2025, not October 2025 (the peak), meaning we are likely closer to its end than the 13-month timeline from the peak would suggest.

QWhat does the author say happens to positive news and developments during a crypto winter?

APositive news is ignored during a crypto winter, but it doesn't disappear. It gets stored as potential energy and is then released powerfully when market sentiment returns to normal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片