Actually, the Crypto Winter Began in January 2025

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

The crypto winter began in January 2025, though many only recently acknowledged it. Bitcoin and Ethereum have fallen 39% and 53% from their October 2025 peaks, with steeper declines for other assets. This is a full bear market, not a correction, driven by over-leverage and profit-taking. Positive developments like regulatory progress and institutional adoption have been ignored amid the downturn, typical of crypto winters where good news fails to lift prices. Historically, crypto winters last around 13 months. However, this one may be closer to ending than it appears, as it effectively started in January 2025. ETF and digital asset trust (DAT) inflows masked the reality for some assets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP saw milder declines (10–20%) due to institutional support, while assets like ADA, AVAX, SUI, and DOT fell 62–75% without such backing. Without $75 billion in ETF/DAT buying, Bitcoin’s drop would have been closer to 60%. The retail crypto market has been in winter since January 2025. Despite the gloom, fundamental strengths remain: regulatory clarity, institutional adoption, stablecoins, tokenization, and Wall Street embrace. These positive factors are stored energy that will fuel the next rally when sentiment shifts. Triggers could include strong economic growth, pro-crypto regulatory surprises, sovereign adoption of Bitcoin, or simply time. As with past winters, the end feels near—despair and frustration are common precursors to recovery. Spring is likely coming s...

Author:Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

We have been in a crypto winter since January 2025. It's likely that we are closer to the end of this winter than to its beginning.

We are in the midst of a full-blown crypto winter.

Crypto Twitter has only recently begun to realize this, but it is undeniable. Bitcoin is down 39% from its all-time high in October 2025, Ethereum is down 53%, and many other crypto assets have fallen even more.

This is not a "bull market correction" or a "slight dip." This is a full-blown, Leonardo DiCaprio-in-The-Revenant-(2012)-level crypto winter—caused by factors such as excessive leverage and widespread profit-taking by seasoned players.

Recognizing and accepting this is enlightening.

Why are crypto prices still falling despite positive news about adoption, regulation, and other areas? Because we are in the depths of a crypto winter.

Why is the new Fed Chair a Bitcoin supporter, yet the Crypto Fear & Greed Index is near historic highs? Because we are in a crypto winter.

Crypto investors who have lived through past winters (be it 2018 or 2022) should remember that at the deepest points of the winter, good news meant nothing. Wall Street hiring aggressively or Morgan Stanley increasing its crypto investments did not drive a crypto market rally. These factors might matter in the long run, but not now. The end of a crypto winter is not exciting; it is exhausting.

So, when will the winter end?

The good news is: We are closer to the end than you think.

The History of Crypto Winters

Crypto winters typically last about 13 months. For example, Bitcoin peaked in December 2017 and bottomed in December 2018. It peaked again in October 2021 and bottomed in November 2022.

By that measure, we are in for a tough time. After all, Bitcoin's peak was in October 2025. Are we really going to have to wait until next November to get back in?

I don't think so.

The more time I spend analyzing the current "winter," the more I realize it actually began in January 2025. It's just that ETF and Digital Asset Trust (DAT) flows masked the truth, preventing us from seeing it.

ETF and DAT Flows Masked the 2025 Winter

Take a closer look at this chart of the components of the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index since January 1, 2025.

It is divided into three clear groups. The first group of assets (BTC, ETH, XRP) performed okay, down 10.3% to 19.9%. The second group (SOL, LTC, LINK) experienced a standard bear market, down 36.9% to 46.2%. But the third group (ADA, AVAX, SUI, DOT) was hit hard, with declines as high as 61.9% to 74.7%.

The fundamental difference between these three groups lies in the ability of institutional investors to invest in them. The first group benefited from strong ETF/DAT support throughout the year (or, in the case of XRP, from winning its lawsuit against the SEC); the second group had ETFs expected to be approved in 20251; and the third group never received such support.

Look at what happened to the third group, which relied solely on crypto-native channels for support!

The institutional support received by the first group was unprecedented. For example, during the period shown in the chart, ETFs and DATs bought 744,417 bitcoins, worth approximately $75 billion. Imagine where Bitcoin would be without that $75 billion in support? I estimate it would be down about 60%.

The retail crypto market has been in a severe winter since January 2025. Institutional investors merely masked this fact for certain assets.

The Darkest Hour Is Just Before the Dawn

What needs to be remembered now is that there is indeed a lot of good news in the crypto space. Regulatory progress is real. Institutional adoption is real. Stablecoins and tokenization are real. Wall Street's acceptance is real.

Good news tends to be ignored in bear markets, but it doesn't disappear. It is stored as potential energy. When the gloom lifts and market sentiment returns to normal, this stored energy will return with a vengeance.

What can lift the gloom? Strong economic growth triggering a wave of aggressive risk-on sentiment, positive surprises from the Clarity Act, signs of Bitcoin recognition by sovereign nations, or simply the passage of time.

As a veteran of multiple crypto winters, I can tell you that the feeling at the end of those winters felt very much like it does now: despair, frustration, and listlessness. But the current market correction has not fundamentally changed anything about crypto.

I believe we will bounce back strongly soon. After all, if it has felt like winter from January 2025 until now, spring must surely be just around the corner.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, when did the crypto winter actually begin?

AThe crypto winter actually began in January 2025.

QWhat was the primary factor that masked the true start of the crypto winter in 2025?

AThe massive inflows into ETFs and Digital Asset Trusts (DATs) masked the true start of the crypto winter.

QHow are the assets in the article's 'third group' characterized, and what was their performance?

AThe third group (ADA, AVAX, SUI, DOT) consists of assets that never received institutional support like ETFs. They were hit the hardest, with declines ranging from 61.9% to 74.7%.

QWhat does the author suggest is the typical duration of a crypto winter, and why does he believe the current one might be different?

AThe typical duration is about 13 months. The author believes the current winter is different because it effectively started in January 2025, not October 2025 (the peak), meaning we are likely closer to its end than the 13-month timeline from the peak would suggest.

QWhat does the author say happens to positive news and developments during a crypto winter?

APositive news is ignored during a crypto winter, but it doesn't disappear. It gets stored as potential energy and is then released powerfully when market sentiment returns to normal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ruHace 5 hora(s)

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ruHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片