a16z Partner: Three Paths for Crypto Projects to Find PMF

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-09Actualizado a 2026-06-09

Resumen

Author: Jason Rosenthal. Compiler: Shenchao TechFlow. Finding Product-Market Fit (PMF) is the most critical variable for a company's survival. In the crypto space, misaligned growth hacking and airdrops often mask the absence of true PMF. However, leading teams are now finding PMF faster. Here are three proven paths for crypto projects to achieve PMF: 1. **Co-build with Anchor Clients:** Partner with the most sophisticated potential clients in your field and develop the product based on their specific needs. Their adoption serves as the strongest validation, more valuable than media coverage or TVL metrics. This approach is shaping current product roadmaps, as seen in collaborations between crypto startups and traditional finance. 2. **Position Ahead of an Exponential Curve:** Identify and position yourself ahead of a major emerging trend before the market fully realizes it. The most evident current curve is the rise of AI Agents as autonomous economic actors. Projects like AgentCash by Merit Systems, which enables AI Agents to pay for API access with crypto, are building foundational payment rails for the impending Agent economy. 3. **Be Your Own First and Best Customer:** The most enduring infrastructure companies don't wait for external validation. They first build and prove their technology by using it to power their own applications at scale before offering it to others. Matter Labs exemplifies this by anchoring its ZKsync technology in a concrete application, Car...

Author: Jason Rosenthal

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: a16z Crypto operating partner Jason Rosenthal outlines three current paths for crypto projects to find Product-Market Fit: collaborating with top-tier clients to build, positioning on the exponential growth curve of AI Agents, and becoming your own first user. The article uses case studies from LayerZero, AgentCash, ZKsync, etc., offering direct reference value for teams pivoting or still searching for PMF.

Product-Market Fit (PMF) is the most critical variable determining a company's survival. Find it, and you have a chance. Fail to find it, and nothing else can save you.

@jasonrosenthal tweeted:

Finding and achieving Product-Market Fit is the most powerful and important thing for any early-stage startup. I've spent a significant part of my career on this, across multiple companies. Here are 5 strategies for finding PMF in Web3.

Throwing more money at the problem just extends the runway to a bad ending. Growth hacking and continuous airdrops disconnected from a real strategy are less a path to PMF and more a way to mask the fact that you haven't found it yet. Some of crypto's most powerful weapons (tokens and network effects) can even mislead projects about their PMF.

The good news is that top teams are now finding PMF faster. Killer applications like stablecoins have been proven, and traditional finance and broader consumer groups are accelerating their entry.

Here are three models that are working. If your project is pre-PMF or pivoting, pay close attention.

1. Partner with Top Clients, Build to Their Specifications

Identify the most sophisticated potential clients in your field and build the product together with them. Their needs are your product spec sheet.

This is slower than building a generic product and iterating publicly. But if your first client handles trillions in daily transaction volume, their adoption is more valuable than any press coverage, TVL numbers, or retail attention. The essential definition of PMF is your product resonating broadly with customers, and these flagship clients are the best indicator.

Judging by the high-profile partnership announcements and product launches between crypto startups and traditional finance firms, product roadmaps are now being written by institutional clients. Blockchains are beginning to host global financial infrastructure.

2. Identify an Exponential Growth Curve and Position Ahead of It

PMF sometimes comes from serving an existing market better. Other times it comes from seeing where a market is going before it fully realizes it itself, and positioning early enough.

The most obvious current curve: AI Agents are becoming economic actors. They autonomously call APIs, deploy capital, and execute transactions at machine speed. The assumption of "human-in-the-loop" is collapsing faster than most expected.

Take Agent commercialization. Samuel Ragsdale and Ryan Sproule at Merit Systems saw this early and are building AgentCash on the x402 protocol. AgentCash enables AI Agents to pay for API access using cryptocurrency, an infrastructure that allows Agents to conduct programmatic transactions without human-managed billing.

Payment is the key link that turns Agents from "assistants" into "participants." Whoever builds these payment rails now will own a foundational layer when the Agent economy arrives.

3. Be Your Own First (and Best) Customer

The most enduring infrastructure companies don't wait for external developers to validate their technology. They build applications on their own rails first, proving capability through live operation, and then invite others to use it.

Amazon executed this playbook masterfully. AWS wasn't sold to startups from day one. Amazon first built the infrastructure needed for its own e-commerce business, proving it at massive scale, before gradually opening it to others.

Matter Labs' Alex Gluchowski is running the same playbook.

Instead of pitching Prividium as an abstract enterprise product, he anchored it to a specific application: tokenized deposits. The result is Cari Network. U.S. regional banks like Huntington Bancshares, First Horizon, M&T Bank, KeyCorp, Old National Bancorp can now transfer customer deposits across banks in real-time on a blockchain rail, while the funds never leave the regulated banking system. ZKsync didn't just build the rail; it found the killer application on it.

Three models, one underlying logic: The fastest path to PMF isn't fumbling in the dark, but choosing the right battlefield and fighting with conviction before everyone else jumps in.

Co-build with the client whose validation compounds. Position ahead of the curve before consensus forms. Be your own first and best customer.

Pick the model that fits your product, and execute.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the three proven paths for crypto projects to achieve Product-Market Fit (PMF)?

AThe three paths are: 1. Co-build products with top-tier clients based on their specific needs. 2. Position ahead of an exponential growth curve, such as the AI Agent economy. 3. Be your own first and best customer by building applications on your own infrastructure to prove its capabilities.

QHow does the article illustrate the strategy of 'binding top clients to build products'?

AThe article illustrates this by noting that current product roadmaps are being written by institutional clients. It suggests finding sophisticated potential clients and co-building products with them, using their demands as the product specification. This is considered more valuable than generic metrics like media coverage or TVL data.

QWhat example is given in the article for finding an exponential growth curve and positioning ahead of it?

AThe example given is the rise of AI Agents becoming economic actors. Specifically, the article mentions the project AgentCash, built on the x402 protocol by Merit Systems, which enables AI Agents to pay for API access with cryptocurrency, thus laying foundational payment rails for the upcoming Agent economy.

QWhat analogy does the article use to explain the strategy of 'being your own first customer'?

AThe article uses the analogy of Amazon Web Services (AWS). It states that AWS was not initially sold to startups; Amazon first built the infrastructure for its own e-commerce business, proved it at scale, and then gradually opened it to others.

QHow is Matter Labs' Alex Gluchowski applying the 'be your own first customer' strategy according to the article?

AInstead of selling Prividium as an abstract enterprise product, Alex Gluchowski anchored it to a specific application: tokenized deposits. This resulted in the Cari Network, which allows US regional banks to transfer customer deposits in real-time on a blockchain, with funds remaining within the regulated banking system. This demonstrates ZKsync finding a killer application on its own rails.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto. With no user compensation plan detailed in the initial response, the incident deals a severe blow to trust in a project already struggling with credibility issues.

Foresight NewsHace 10 min(s)

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight NewsHace 10 min(s)

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

The article "How to Use Claude's Dynamic Workflows for Deep Research" discusses overcoming the pitfalls of technical research, where both humans and AI can get overwhelmed by information, leading to vague conclusions. It introduces Claude Code's new "Dynamic Workflows" feature, which automatically designs and executes task-specific workflows before starting a task, unlike simpler "planning modes." This approach incorporates validation, result convergence, and adversarial verification from the outset. The core of Dynamic Workflows is six predefined scheduling patterns that address how to decompose tasks and synthesize results: 1. **Classify-and-Act (Routing):** An agent classifies the task and routes it to the most suitable specialist agent for execution. It's precise and efficient but struggles with ambiguous tasks. 2. **Fan-out & Merge:** The task is split into parallel, independent subtasks whose results are later merged. It's fast and isolates contexts but is more expensive and challenging to synthesize. 3. **Adversarial Verification:** Multiple "challenger" agents critique a worker agent's conclusion, requiring majority approval. This counters confirmation bias and self-assessment errors but relies on verifiable facts. 4. **Generate & Filter:** Multiple agents generate many candidate solutions, which are then filtered against a rubric to output only the best. It fosters diversity but depends heavily on the filter's quality. 5. **Tournament:** Multiple agents compete on the same task, with pairwise comparisons eliminating contestants over rounds to select the best. This offers stable relative judgment but is complex. 6. **Loop:** An agent iteratively attempts a task, learning from errors and adjusting until a stop condition is met. It handles tasks with unknown scope but risks infinite loops without proper design. The author compares their own custom deep-research system, which involved multi-agent analysis and deduplication but lacked goal-oriented convergence, to Claude's built-in workflow. The official workflow adds critical layers: initial problem decomposition, credibility assessment of sources, cross-agent voting to delete weak conclusions (not just averaging), and output tightly focused on the user's original goals and actionable recommendations. This structurally addresses common AI issues like goal drift, premature stopping, context pollution, and output bias. In summary, Dynamic Workflows represent a shift from smarter single conversations to a structured research process, compressing what used to require many dialogues into 3-4 interactions, albeit at higher token cost. The author notes remaining challenges for their specific domain (blockchain research): the need for fact-based verification over official documentation, depth in truly novel interdisciplinary thinking, the practical validation of proposed solutions, and tailoring information density to the audience.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

When LPs Use Doubao to Teach Investing: A Transition Story of a Private Equity GP AI is making life increasingly difficult for small private equity fund managers, as a former GP of an offshore dollar fund reveals. The fund, managing tens of millions in US stocks, outperformed the Nasdaq but struggled with fundraising. Its traditional Cayman SPC/BVI structure failed to attract major Asian LPs, who now prefer Hong Kong LPF or Singapore VCC frameworks. The rise of AI-powered quantitative strategies has further squeezed the space for funds like his, which relied on subjective, discretionary investing. AI tools have leveled the information playing field, empowering LPs—often high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs, or family offices—to analyze investments themselves using chatbots like Doubao. This has eroded trust in GPs' expertise, leading to more frequent challenges over investment decisions and even withdrawals, especially during market rallies when retail investors sometimes outperform funds. Friction arises not necessarily from AI's capabilities but from how LPs use it. Many rely on conversational AI for validation rather than rigorous analysis, sometimes receiving misleading or hallucinated advice. While AI democratizes research, effective investing still requires discerning real insight from plausible-sounding output. Ultimately, AI is unlikely to fully replace GPs. Asset management remains a trust-based service. However, the industry must adapt. The future may see "human私募" (private equity) learning from AI and focusing more on providing value beyond pure analysis—perhaps by mastering the emotional intelligence and trust-building that machines cannot replicate.

Odaily星球日报Hace 48 min(s)

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

Odaily星球日报Hace 48 min(s)

AI Leads to Layoffs? Research Shows AI Is More Expensive Than the People It Replaces

Title: AI Layoffs? Research Shows AI is More Expensive Than the Workers It Replaces. This year, nearly 50,000 employees have been laid off due to AI, with companies initially believing AI could replace human jobs. However, recent findings indicate that the actual operational costs of AI often exceed the expense of the human labor it was meant to replace. Examples include Uber exhausting its annual AI budget in just four months, Microsoft cutting Claude Code licenses due to high costs, and an Anthropic employee incurring $150,000 in API usage in a single month. A CloudZero survey reveals that 45% of enterprises spend over $100,000 monthly on AI, yet only 8% of S&P 500 companies report any AI-related revenue, and half struggle to measure ROI. Analyst Scott Galloway predicts a shift toward cheaper Chinese AI models, which are 10 to 30 times more affordable than American counterparts. Data shows Chinese models' usage among developers surged from 1% in 2024 to over 60% by mid-2026, with 80% of U.S. AI startups adopting them. This trend may prompt regulatory responses, such as potential restrictions from the Trump administration.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Leads to Layoffs? Research Shows AI Is More Expensive Than the People It Replaces

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Wang Chuan: After Investing in Storage Stocks and Seeing a Thirty-Fold Return, How to Remain Unanxious (Part 7) - A Quarter-Century Cycle

Wang Chuan: Reflections on Investment Anxiety and Market Cycles After Observing a 30x Gain in a Storage Stock (Part 7) – A Quarter-Century Cycle This article examines the cyclical nature and inherent risks in technology hardware investments, using the storage and semiconductor sectors as examples. It criticizes the misleading practice of "annualized" Net Dollar Retention (NDR) rates, where short-term growth is extrapolated unrealistically. A key concept explored is "reflexivity" – demand driven by panic, exploration, and liquidity during market booms, which can vanish just as quickly when conditions reverse. This reflexivity exists both in product demand and among speculative stock buyers, creating powerful feedback loops that inflate prices during upturns and exacerbate crashes during downturns. The author highlights a major risk for hardware sectors: unlike assets with defined cycles (e.g., Bitcoin's halving), there's no guarantee of a swift recovery post-crash. Companies like Micron, Intel, and Cisco took roughly a quarter-century to surpass their 2000 highs, enduring drawdowns exceeding 80%. This is attributed to the "bullwhip effect" in supply chains, where demand collapses instantly but过剩产能 persists, and a migration of narrative-driven capital. High-valuation stories吸引 speculative funds during growth phases, but these funds quickly depart for the next hot narrative once growth slows, leaving behind stronger companies with much lower valuations. The piece warns of dangerous mental models formed during bull markets: 1) equating current strong demand with perpetual high growth, and 2) believing that making fast, large profits is easy. Citing巴菲特, the author notes that easy money undermines rationality, likening speculators to Cinderella at a ball with a clock that has no hands. The current phase presents an asymmetric risk-reward scenario: potential for further gains exists, but the downside risk is an 80%+ drawdown and a multi-decade wait for breakeven, which reflexive speculators cannot tolerate. The hypothetical investor "老王" (Lao Wang), who achieved a 30x return, is used to illustrate potential pitfalls. Leverage could lead to a wipeout during a sharp correction. Even without leverage, ingrained beliefs in easy money would likely lead him to double down after losses, expecting a quick rebound. Instead, he might face a protracted decline, depleting his resources through frantic trading as the high-growth narrative fades. The conclusion references Schopenhauer, comparing those who have seen multiple market cycles to an audience seeing the same magic trick repeatedly—once the illusion is understood, its power is gone.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Wang Chuan: After Investing in Storage Stocks and Seeing a Thirty-Fold Return, How to Remain Unanxious (Part 7) - A Quarter-Century Cycle

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros