a16z Crypto Operating Partner: Wall Street Is Undergoing Its Biggest Infrastructure Upgrade in 30 Years

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-26Actualizado a 2026-03-26

Resumen

Wall Street is undergoing its largest infrastructure upgrade in 30 years by migrating to on-chain systems, moving beyond mere blockchain exploration. This shift is driven by the promise of significantly faster capital movement, similar to the electronic trading revolution of the 1990s which reduced costs, expanded participation, and increased market size. Tokenization—digital representations of real-world assets like Treasuries and stocks on blockchain—enables 24/7 markets, instant settlement, fractional ownership, and global accessibility. Major institutions are already adopting this: DTCC plans to tokenize U.S. Treasuries by 2026, NYSE is launching a platform for on-chain stock trading, and Tradeweb has executed real-time blockchain-based Treasury trades. The current financial system’s inefficiencies—high fees, slow settlement, and intermediary dependencies—create opportunities for disruption. Smart contracts and atomic settlement eliminate these frictions, turning existing profit margins into avenues for innovation. Regulatory clarity, such as the CLARITY Act, is further accelerating this transition. Established institutions are not competitors but potential customers for new infrastructure products. Founders have a window to build the next generation of financial services atop this emerging regulated, institutional-grade framework. The outcome will be a larger, more liquid, and accessible global market.

Author: Jason Rosenthal, a16z Operating Partner

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

Wall Street is no longer just exploring blockchain; it is migrating to it.

For years, the institutions that form the backbone of global capital markets—exchanges, clearinghouses, and electronic trading platforms—have been watching from the sidelines. Now, they are moving on-chain.

What is happening now is the largest infrastructure upgrade in capital markets since the rise of electronic trading thirty years ago.

But most people won't realize it until the transformation is complete.

Why the Shift Now: Speed Changes Everything

All institutions moving in this direction share one core belief—on-chain infrastructure will significantly increase the velocity of capital. History has clearly demonstrated this.

Think back to the development of electronic trading in the 1990s: before Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs) and online brokers emerged, a single trade could take minutes to complete, spreads were quoted in fractions, and access was restricted by geography and capital. Then, the infrastructure changed. Spreads narrowed dramatically. Commissions dropped from $150 to $9.95, and eventually to zero. Trading volume exploded. Retail participation surged. The markets of the 2000s were fundamentally different from those of the 1990s—not just cheaper, but larger.

Tokenization applies this same logic to the entire global financial system: 24/7 markets, instant settlement, seamless cross-border distribution, fractionalization of assets previously locked behind six-figure minimums, real-time collateral movement instead of overnight idleness. Higher transaction velocity. Broader participation. A larger market overall.

But what exactly does tokenization mean? A tokenized asset is a digital representation of a real-world asset (RWA)—such as a treasury bond, Apple stock, or a real estate deed—recorded on a blockchain as a programmable token. Unlike the past, where custodians tracked ownership in centralized databases during specific time zone business hours, tokenized assets exist on-chain: transferable, programmable, and capable of instant settlement globally, at any time.

It is not a derivative; it is the actual asset—but with a superior underlying architecture.

Institutions are already taking action.

In December 2025, DTCC received a no-action letter from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), authorizing it to tokenize real-world assets on approved blockchains. DTCC processed $3.7 quadrillion in transactions in 2024. Its current goal is to launch a tokenized U.S. Treasury service in the first half of 2026.

On January 19, 2026, the New York Stock Exchange announced a platform for 24/7 on-chain trading and settlement of U.S. stocks and ETFs—including fractional shares, instant settlement, and stablecoin financing—in partnership with Bank of New York (BNY) and Citi Group, supported by tokenized deposits from ICE Clear Credit. The world's most iconic stock exchange is moving on-chain.

In August 2025, Tradeweb completed the first real-time, fully on-chain financing of a U.S. Treasury with USDC as consideration—this trade was executed on a Saturday, bypassing traditional settlement windows, with participants including Bank of America, Citadel Securities, DTCC, and Virtu Financial. Since then, this financing model has expanded quarterly and now includes cross-border and intraday settlement. Nasdaq submitted its proposed rule change to the SEC in September 2025.

This looks increasingly like a migration, not a series of isolated experiments.

The Hidden Costs in the Current System

A second factor driving this shift: the existing market is built around intermediaries, not the market itself.

Consider a typical securities trade: a trader pays a spread to a broker. In institutional trades, a prime broker charges financing fees. Exchanges and transfer agents take commissions. Custodians charge safekeeping fees. DTCC levies fees for clearing, netting, and settlement. Even with the U.S. finally achieving T+1 settlement in 2024—a reform decades in the making, as it previously took days—capital is still locked up overnight, effectively a "structural tax" on all participants.

Smart contracts and atomic settlement break this logjam. Now, counterparties can transact immediately on-chain with finality.

The profit margins in the existing system—their take rate—haven't disappeared... they've become the opportunity for new entrants. In other words, their margin is your opportunity to build the new system.

***

The final breakthrough is regulatory clarity—and this process has finally begun. If the current momentum holds, the CLARITY Act's impact on TradFi will mirror what the Genius Act achieved for the adoption and acceleration of stablecoins.

The safeguards large institutions require are taking shape. So, what does this mean for builders?

The migration of global financial infrastructure on-chain will create demand for entirely new categories of products and services.

The fastest-moving incumbents are not your competitors—they are your customers. DTCC doesn't want to build middleware. The New York Stock Exchange doesn't want to build compliance tools. Tradeweb doesn't want to build a cross-border distribution layer.

These companies are building regulated, institutional-grade infrastructure. Founders are responsible for building all the products that run on top of it.

This is exactly the same pattern as the 1990s. The exchanges didn't build E*TRADE. They didn't build the Bloomberg terminal. They didn't build the order management systems and prime brokerage platforms that defined the next era. Those platforms were built by founders who saw the future coming.

More participants, faster velocity, lower friction.

Higher liquidity, larger markets.

History has made it abundantly clear where this ultimately leads.

The window to build the infrastructure for tokenized financial markets is open. Seize the moment, and build steadily.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument made by the a16z Crypto operating partner regarding Wall Street's infrastructure upgrade?

AThe a16z Crypto operating partner argues that Wall Street is undergoing its largest infrastructure upgrade in 30 years, with major financial institutions migrating to on-chain infrastructure rather than just exploring blockchain technology.

QHow does tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) improve financial markets according to the article?

ATokenization enables 24/7 markets, instant settlement, seamless cross-border distribution, fractional ownership of previously high-minimum assets, real-time collateral movement, higher transaction speeds, broader participation, and ultimately larger market size.

QWhich major financial institutions are mentioned as actively moving towards on-chain infrastructure?

AThe article mentions DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Tradeweb, Nasdaq, ICE Clear Credit, Bank of New York (BNY), and Citi Group as institutions actively adopting or developing on-chain infrastructure.

QWhat historical analogy does the author draw to explain the significance of the current shift to blockchain?

AThe author compares the current shift to blockchain to the rise of electronic trading in the 1990s, which dramatically reduced costs (commissions dropped from $150 to zero), tightened spreads, increased trading volume, and expanded retail participation.

QWhat opportunity does the article suggest for founders and builders in this new financial infrastructure shift?

AThe article suggests that founders should build products and services that run on top of the new regulated, institutional-grade on-chain infrastructure being built by established companies, similar to how E*TRADE and Bloomberg Terminal were built on top of electronic trading infrastructure in the 1990s.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片