A Decade-Old Coin: Zcash Also Faces a Midlife Crisis

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-09Actualizado a 2026-01-09

Resumen

Zcash, a nearly decade-old privacy-focused cryptocurrency, faced a major crisis when its entire core development team, the Electric Coin Company (ECC), collectively resigned on January 7. The team, led by CEO Josh Swihart, left due to a governance dispute with the board of the non-profit Bootstrap organization, which oversees ECC. The conflict centered around Zashi, a privacy-first mobile wallet developed by ECC. The team wanted to privatize Zashi to attract external investment and operate as a nimble startup, but the board opposed, citing legal and compliance risks associated with converting a non-profit asset into a for-profit entity. This disagreement escalated into public accusations, with Swihart calling the board’s actions “malicious governance” and accusing them of making working conditions untenable. The board members, referred to as “ZCAM” (Zaki Manian, Christina, Alan, Michelle), were criticized—particularly Zaki, who had prior controversies in the crypto space. Following the resignation, the former ECC team announced a new venture, CashZ, and plans to launch a new wallet based on Zashi’s codebase, allowing seamless migration for existing users. The incident highlights recurring tensions in crypto between non-profit foundations and entrepreneurial development teams, especially as projects mature and face valuation pressures. Zcash’s token ZEC had surged nearly 800% in late 2025, making governance and control over key assets like Zashi increasingly contentious.

Written by: Kuli, Shenchao TechFow

On January 7th, the core development team of Zcash collectively resigned.

Not just one or two people throwing a tantrum, but the entire Electric Coin Company, about 25 people, led by the CEO, all left.

This company has an abbreviation, ECC, and is the main developer behind Zcash. You can understand it as: the people who write the code, quit.

Upon the news, ZEC plummeted by 20%.

A hot piece of knowledge: Zcash is almost ten years old.

Launched on October 28, 2016, it's older than many people's time in the crypto space. Its selling point back then was "private transactions"—sender, receiver, amount, all encrypted, nothing visible on the chain.

But the reality is, after nine years online, less than 1% of ZEC transactions actually used this feature.

The remaining 99% are still running naked.

Nine years. The product isn't used, but the team kept grinding. The price dropped from over $3,000 when it first launched in 2016 to $15 in July 2024.

Then, by the end of 2025, ZEC suddenly surged.

It was hovering around $40 at the start of the year, and by November 7th, it soared to $744, market cap breaking $10 billion, clawing its way back into the top twenty.

The long-dormant narrative of privacy coins suddenly became sexy again.

Okay, the price skyrocketed nearly 800%, and then, "the development team ran away."

This story sounds like a middle-aged man's script. Bought a Porsche, then got divorced. Year-end bonus came in, then it's splitsville.

When there's little money, everyone is comrades; when money increases, they start fighting over who calls the shots.

What are they fighting over? A wallet called Zashi.

Zashi is a mobile wallet released by ECC in early 2024, promoting "privacy features enabled by default." It's the most important user entry point in the Zcash ecosystem.

The ECC team wanted to privatize Zashi, bring in external investment, and turn it into a startup capable of raising funds and iterating quickly.

But ECC is not an independent company. In 2020, ECC was placed into a non-profit organization called Bootstrap, structured as a US 501(c)(3).

Simply put, this structure is specifically for charities and public welfare organizations. The benefit is no taxes, the downside is that money made cannot be distributed to insiders, and how assets are handled must be approved by the board of directors.

Back then, this was done for compliance, to avoid regulatory pressure from the SEC. In a bear market, no one cared about these details, as there was no money to share anyway.

Now, the Bootstrap board says, no.

The board's reasons are:

We are a non-profit organization with a fiduciary duty to protect donor interests. Privatizing Zashi could be illegal, could lead to lawsuits, could be politically attacked. They even gave an example: Look at OpenAI, trying to transition from non-profit to for-profit, how many people sued.

ECC's former CEO, Josh Swihart, sees it differently. He said on Twitter that the board's actions constitute "malicious governance behavior," making it "impossible for the team to perform their duties effectively and with dignity."

He used a legal term: "constructive discharge," meaning although not formally fired, the working conditions were altered to make the job untenable, equivalent to being forced out.

25 people forced out together.

Simultaneously, Swihart named four board members: Zaki, Christina, Alan, Michelle. He connected their initials, calling them "ZCAM."

ZCAM. Sounds like SCAM. Not sure if it's intentional.

Among these four, Zaki Manian has the most stories.

He's an old-timer in the Cosmos ecosystem, was a core member of Tendermint. Resigned in 2020 after a public feud with founder Jae Kwon.

In 2023, the FBI informed him that two developers on a project he was responsible for were North Korean agents. After finding out, he concealed this for 16 months before making it public. In October 2024, Jae Kwon publicly accused him of "gross negligence" and "betraying the community's trust."

Now, he is a member of the Zcash board of directors.

The day after resigning, the former ECC team announced the formation of a new company, codenamed CashZ.

They said they would use the Zashi codebase to create a new wallet, to be launched within weeks. Existing Zashi users can migrate seamlessly.

"We are the same team, with the same mission: to build unstoppable private money."

No new token, no starting from scratch, just changing the shell to keep working.

The most ironic part of this, we think, is the timing.

When ZEC was $15, no one cared who managed the wallet. When it hit $500, how much Zashi was worth became a matter of life and death.

When money appears, you find out who's family.

Similarly, the conflict between a non-profit and a startup team: OpenAI ended with the board losing, Zcash ended with the team leaving.

Who won is unclear, but this conflict is indeed common in crypto projects.

Swihart wrote a passage on the CashZ website explaining why they left:

"The non-profit foundation model is a relic of the compliance era in crypto. An era where projects needed 'compliance buffers' to protect themselves. But these buffers introduced bureaucracy and divergence in roadmap. Startups can scale fast, non-profits cannot."

He also said: "Anyone who's been in crypto for a few years knows that the entanglement of non-profit foundations and tech startups is a source of endless drama."

It truly is endless drama.

In 2023, when Zooko stepped down as CEO, there were rumors of disagreements with Swihart. In January 2025, Zcash Foundation board member Peter Van Valkenburgh also resigned.

A decade-old coin, those who were supposed to leave have pretty much all gone.

Someone asked on Twitter: Will Zcash die?

The chain is still running. The code is still there. It's just that the people writing the code have changed.

But Swihart is right, the conflict between non-profits and startups is a common disease in this industry. Cosmos argued. The Ethereum Foundation argued. The Solana Foundation argued.

The difference is only in the manner and intensity of the arguments.

Zcash chose the most straightforward way.

Break up.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the resignation of the Zcash core development team?

AThe price of ZEC (Zcash) dropped by 20%.

QWhat was the primary reason for the conflict between the ECC team and the Bootstrap board of directors?

AThe conflict centered on the ECC team's proposal to privatize the Zashi wallet and bring in external investment, which the non-profit Bootstrap board opposed due to legal and fiduciary concerns.

QWhat is the name of the new company formed by the former ECC team, and what is its first project?

AThe new company is called CashZ, and its first project is to launch a new wallet based on the Zashi codebase, allowing for seamless migration for existing users.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of ZEC transactions actually used the coin's flagship privacy feature?

ALess than 1% of ZEC transactions used the privacy feature.

QWhich controversial figure on the Bootstrap board was previously involved in a scandal concerning North Korean developers?

AZaki Manian, a member of the Bootstrap board (part of the 'ZCAM' group), was previously involved in a scandal where he waited 16 months to disclose that two developers on a project he oversaw were North Korean agents.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar CORE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar CORE (CORE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar CORE (CORE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu CORE (CORE)Después de comprar tu CORE (CORE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear CORE (CORE)Tradear fácilmente con CORE (CORE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

287 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar CORE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de CORE (CORE).

活动图片