Stanford Professor Live-Streams Training of 535B Large Model, Is the 'Black Box' Behind Model Training Being Opened?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-08-24Actualizado a 2026-08-24

Resumen

Stanford Professor Percy Liang is live-streaming the training of Marin 535B-A23B, a massive language model with 535 billion total and 23 billion active parameters. This unprecedented, transparent process, using 11 GB200 NVL72 systems (792 GPUs) and 18.75 trillion tokens over three months, aims to demystify the traditionally opaque "black box" of large-scale AI model development. The initiative allows public access to real-time training curves, data composition, engineering configurations, and logs via platforms like Weights & Biases and GitHub. Prior to the main run, the team conducted scaled-down experiments to debug and predict outcomes. The move has sparked significant interest, with observers highlighting its value for open collaboration, education, and witnessing real-world training challenges like parameter spikes and model instability. Liang’s related course, "CS336: Language Models From Scratch," further emphasizes his commitment to making AI model construction accessible.

In the last two days, a post by X user Max For AI@MaxForAI has sparked heated discussion among netizens: "This is insane — now you can even livestream and watch how a 535B large model is being trained."

It turns out that Stanford professor and Simile AI founder Percy Liang@percyliang announced the launch of training for the Marin 535B-A23B model by Marin Open Lab, and the entire training process will be conducted publicly.

Marin has a total of 535 billion parameters and 23 billion active parameters. For this, Percy Liang and the team prepared a total of 18.75 trillion tokens of training data and deployed 11 sets of GB200 NVL72 systems, equivalent to approximately 792 GB200 GPUs.

The model is expected to train continuously for about 3 months, with a total training compute of approximately 2.7e24 FLOPs. After training is complete, the team will continue with the post-training phase.

In other words: For the next few months, everyone can watch a cutting-edge large model grow from scratch.

Also worth noting is that Percy Liang stated that before officially starting this training run, the team first trained a 4-stage Scaling Ladder, ranging from 1.6B-A61M (48B tokens) all the way up to 27.7B-A1.2B (926B tokens).

"Doing this serves two purposes: first, to use these small-scale experiments to discover and debug potential issues in advance; second, to predict our 'hero run' (main model training) based on the training performance of models at different scales."

Of course, Percy Liang also said, "This is by far the largest-scale training we have ever undertaken, so we are indeed expecting some unexpected situations to arise during the process."

Currently, the main model has officially begun running, and anyone can directly view the real-time training curves. Subsequently, training data, experiment logs, and engineering issues will also be continuously made public.

For example, on the data front, this includes the training data mixture ratios, data processing methods, and how data from different domains enters the model; on the engineering front, including training configurations, code, and experiment design; and the training process, including real-time loss changes, model states, and prediction results at different stages.

Simultaneously, Percy Liang also made public specific viewing channels.

View data composition: https://storage.googleapis.com/marin-public/held/harrier-k40-cluster-overview/2026.08.18/index.html?revision=uniform-sampling

Watch the training process live on Weights & Biases (wandb): https://wandb.ai/marin-community/marin_moe/reports/535B-A23B-18T-Token-Hero-Run-Scaling-Ladder--VmlldzoxNzc2MDM5Ng

View all details on GitHub: https://github.com/marin-community/marin/issues/8435

After understanding the details, it's not hard to see why Percy Liang's move has attracted such widespread attention. Because in the past, for models like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini, no one knew exactly how they were trained behind the scenes; it was like a "black box."

People could only see the final model capabilities, benchmark scores, and limited descriptions in papers. The data mixture ratios, what failures occurred during training, which hyperparameters were effective, how the loss changed, and whether the Scaling law predictions were accurate—all these were unknown.

Marin is trying to change this. Perhaps model training can also be like papers and open-source software: observable, discussable, and collaborative.

Since this news was announced, the enthusiasm of netizens continues to grow.

Some netizens believe this embodies the true spirit of open source: "Even if problems arise or things deviate from expectations during training, nothing is hidden."

Other netizens remarked that even though training the model itself is massive, what's truly astonishing is that people can now, via the WandB platform, watch in real-time how a large model training effort worth tens of billions of dollars grows step by step?

"It's as if the tightly shut 'dark room' inside top AI labs has suddenly been opened, and everyone can see what's happening inside."

Over the next three months, perhaps the most anticipated thing is not the final model's capabilities, but observing how many times this model will experience "explosions," crashes, and unexpected situations during training...

Furthermore, some netizens believe this move not only provides a perspective to watch the entire model training process but even offers a platform for learning and discussion.

Netizen James Thewlis@jdthewlis has been following the training process in real-time. During this, he didn't understand "why there is a spike in norms (parameter norms) around approximately step 500?"

After figuring it out himself, he then answered his own question in the comments: "This spike is entirely caused by the router_bias. It is not a parameter obtained through gradient training but is part of the token balancing heuristic in MoE (Mixture of Experts) models. Therefore, it has a different dynamic pattern from ordinary model parameters."

There are many situations like this.

Additionally, it's worth mentioning that Percy Liang, as a Stanford professor, besides this hands-on practice, also teaches a theoretical course: "CS336: Language Models From Scratch," with the goal of enabling students to fully understand how a large language model is built.

It seems Percy Liang really wants to teach everyone how to "build" large models. Interested netizens can learn more about it.

Course link: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoROMvodv4rMqXOcazWaTUHhq-yembLCV

So, what do you think? How do you view this livestream that truly brings large model training to the forefront? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments!

References:

https://x.com/MaxForAI/status/2091270116067750089

https://x.com/percyliang/status/2090918065634684997

https://x.com/CopyRebeldia/status/2091231950774112412?s=20

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoROMvodv4rMqXOcazWaTUHhq-yembLCV

This article is from the WeChat public account "Almost Human" (ID: almosthuman2014), author: Following AI

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the Marin 535B-A23B model training project led by Professor Percy Liang?

AThe main purpose is to publicly and transparently train a large-scale language model, making the entire process observable and open to the community, thereby demystifying the traditionally opaque 'black box' of large model training.

QWhat resources are being used to train the Marin 535B-A23B model?

AThe model is being trained on 11 GB200 NVL72 systems, approximately 792 GB200 GPUs, using a training dataset of 18.75 trillion tokens.

QWhat is the Scaling Ladder mentioned in the article, and what was its purpose?

AThe Scaling Ladder refers to a series of smaller-scale training runs conducted before the main 'hero run' of the 535B model. Its purposes were to debug potential issues early and to predict the training behavior of the larger main model based on the performance of these smaller models.

QHow can the public observe the training process of the Marin 535B model?

AThe public can observe the training process in real-time through the Weights & Biases (wandb) platform, view data composition on a provided Google Cloud Storage link, and access detailed logs and engineering information on a dedicated GitHub issue page.

QAccording to the article, why is this public training project considered significant for the AI community?

AIt is significant because it transforms the previously secretive and closed-door process of training state-of-the-art large models into an open, observable, and collaborative endeavor, allowing researchers and enthusiasts to learn from and discuss the entire process, including challenges and failures.

Lecturas Relacionadas

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

**EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Reducing Staking "Subsidies" – What Does Ethereum Want in Return?** EIP-8363 proposes burning an increasing portion of validator rewards as the staking rate rises, reaching 100% burn when 50% of ETH is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, examines whether ETH's yield explains its price, quantifies the chain economy's reliance on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. **EIP-1559 Burns Are Ineffective:** Post-merge, burning (via base fees) has collapsed by 98% and now offsets only 2.4% of new ETH issuance, making issuance policy Ethereum's sole remaining supply lever. 2. **EIP-8363's Real Impact:** At the current ~42.2M ETH staked, the proposal would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, removing ~633k ETH ($1.55B) in annual dilution (0.53% of market cap). It's not zero issuance; that would require 43% more ETH staked. 3. **Self-Limiting Mechanism:** The design has a built-in equilibrium. At reasonable required returns (e.g., 2%), the system stabilizes at ~26% staking rate and ~0.48% annual inflation. 4. **Yield vs. Price:** No detectable statistical relationship exists between changes in staking yield and ETH price returns over 43 months. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 did not drive price action. 5. **Chain Economy Dependence:** While LSTs like wstETH form ~34% of collateral in major lending markets, their utility as collateral remains if yield is positive. The direct revenue hit to protocols like Lido is significant (~50% of fee income) but not systemic. Staking-focused ETFs represent only 0.19% of ETH supply. 6. **Core Conflict:** The debate masks a zero-sum redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staking intermediaries (LST/LRT protocols, leverage players) to the dispersed majority of non-staking ETH holders. 7. **Outlook:** The proposal is economically sound for ETH's scarcity but politically difficult due to concentrated opposition. It is unlikely to pass in its current form.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片