The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-31Actualizado a 2026-07-31

Resumen

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

Two economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) believe that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race will not be the country that develops the most powerful model, but the one that manages to establish the currency on which these models and their accompanying infrastructure are based.

Chancxu Fu and Xiago Huang recently suggested that the strengthening of an economic cycle, where the energy for AI data centers, AI infrastructure, and the very cost of using AI are valued in US dollars, could lead to an increase in the dominance of the US dollar through stablecoins.

The thesis underlying this premise is simple: if companies have to pay for everything AI-related in dollars, and AI becomes a much larger industry than today in terms of monetary turnover and significance, there will be a renewed sharp increase in global demand for dollar liquidity. The authors define this factor as the first channel of dollar dominance in AI.

The second channel is related to the use of a specific currency that will facilitate payments involving agents; such payments could become ubiquitous if AI, as many in the crypto industry believe, consistently displaces human-managed systems in logistics, inventory management, and treasury operations. "In particular, dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements necessary for agent-based commerce," they explain.

These two channels can intersect, as agent systems could execute settlements for AI-related computational payments in stablecoins, creating a positive dollar loop, from which it is difficult to break free.

Although stablecoins are not the only available substitute for the dollar, they could benefit from early network effects, as they are already ready to play this role in the AI economy, while tokenized deposits of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are not yet ready for this task.

This would have a side effect that would also benefit the US: increased demand for US Treasury bonds used as collateral to support the growing market capitalization of stablecoins.

The report calls on ASEAN+3 countries, including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Japan, and South Korea, to limit their dependence on this "dollar loop."

Creating regional data centers and developing tokenized forms of money based on local currencies could help avoid strengthening the link between stablecoins and AI, as well as help these countries participate in the AI economy without indirectly supporting a new level of dependence on AI.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the AMRO economists, what determines the winner in the AI race?

AThe winner in the AI race will not be the country that develops the most powerful model, but the one that manages to establish the currency on which these models and their accompanying infrastructure are based.

QWhat are the two channels through which AI could reinforce US dollar dominance, as described by Chengxu Fu and Xiago Huang?

A1. The first channel is the renewed surge in global demand for US dollar liquidity if all costs associated with AI must be paid in dollars, making AI a vastly larger industry. 2. The second channel is the use of a specific currency to facilitate payments involving AI agents, where USD-linked stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for agentic commerce.

QWhy could stablecoins have an early advantage over tokenized CBDC deposits in the AI economy?

AStablecoins could win due to early network effects, as they are already primed to play this role in the AI economy, while tokenized Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) deposits are not yet ready for this task.

QWhat beneficial side effect for the US could result from a growth in stablecoin market capitalization backed by US treasuries?

AA growth in demand for US Treasury bonds, which are used as collateral to support the increasing market capitalization of stablecoins, would be a beneficial side effect for the United States.

QWhat recommendations are made for ASEAN+3 countries to limit their dependence on the potential 'dollar loop'?

AThe report recommends creating regional data centers and developing tokenized forms of money based on local currencies. This could help avoid strengthening the link between stablecoins and AI and allow these countries to participate in the AI economy without indirectly supporting a new level of AI dependency.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Алгоритмы в криптовалютах: как работает стратегия «Криптоинструменты» от «Финама»

Algorithms in cryptocurrency offer investors a way to manage digital assets without emotional decisions. Finam's "Crypto Instruments" strategy employs an algorithmic approach focused on systematic trading rather than market speculation. The article explains that in crypto, algorithms fall into two main categories: 1) consensus algorithms (like Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake) that secure blockchain networks, and 2) trading algorithms for automated execution. Finam's strategy is a trend-following model designed for medium-term upward trends. It automatically trades a basket of nine major and meme cryptocurrencies (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin) available on its platform. The algorithm seeks to enter positions early in a trend and exit during downtrends, moving capital to conservative instruments. It does not engage in short selling. Key features include full automation, a focus on discipline over emotion, and risk management like the 1% rule per trade. It's intended for qualified investors with a minimum entry of ~90k RUB and handles Russian tax reporting. Historical backtesting over four years showed approximately 400% total return with a max drawdown under 20%, outperforming a simple buy-and-hold approach on the same assets. However, future returns are not guaranteed and depend on market conditions, with an estimated annual return of around 60% being a potential scenario in a bullish market. The core principle is portfolio diversification and systematic execution. The strategy's main limitations are its inability to profit from falling markets, vulnerability to prolonged sideways markets with false signals, and its dependence on the emergence of clear upward trends. It is positioned as a high-risk portfolio component, not a source of guaranteed returns.

cryptonews.ruJusto ahora

Алгоритмы в криптовалютах: как работает стратегия «Криптоинструменты» от «Финама»

cryptonews.ruJusto ahora

Trading

Spot
活动图片