SEC Gives Green Light to Fund Tokenization, Cathie Wood's ARK to Move Fund Shares onto the Blockchain

marsbitPublicado a 2026-09-08Actualizado a 2026-09-08

Resumen

The SEC appears to be opening a path for tokenized funds, with Cathie Wood's ARK Investment Management seeking regulatory approval to put its fund shares on-chain. According to SEC filings, ARK has applied to modify an existing exemption to add a new "Tokenized Class" of shares for its ARK Venture Fund. These tokenized shares would be recorded on a distributed ledger (DLT), tradable on regulated alternative trading systems (ATS) or via peer-to-peer transfers between whitelisted wallets that have passed KYC/AML checks. This move signifies a potential shift for major asset managers from simply issuing tokenized assets (Phase 1) to directly tokenizing the shares of the funds they manage (Phase 2). ARK's application is a case-by-case exemption, separate from a broader, yet-to-be-released SEC "innovation exemption" framework for tokenized securities, which has been delayed. If successful, ARK's model could provide a template for the industry, enabling fund shares to become tradable, composable assets on-chain. The ARK Venture Fund, an interval fund investing in private tech companies like OpenAI and SpaceX, currently has limited liquidity, offering quarterly repurchases of only 5% of shares. Tokenization could address this liquidity mismatch. The development points to a deeper convergence between traditional capital markets and on-chain finance, though significant regulatory steps and broader industry adoption (Phase 3) remain ahead.

Author: Jae, PANews

On September 8th, Andy, founder of The Rollup, revealed that a large fund has received a "green light" from the SEC, allowing its fund shares to be tokenized and put on-chain.

Coincidentally, the SEC's latest regulatory filing shows that ARK is applying for an amendment to its exemptive order. If approved, it would become the first major US asset management firm to launch tokenized securities based on a case-specific exemption.

This move reflects a subtle evolution in US digital asset regulation: the SEC's universal "innovation relief" framework for tokenized securities is still "unfinished," while case-specific exemptions leave an opening for pilot projects by leading institutions. Previously, asset managers entering the RWA space mostly issued on-chain tokenized assets; now, they are beginning to directly turn the shares of the funds they manage into tokenized securities that can be registered and transferred on-chain.

The fusion of traditional capital markets and on-chain markets is approaching a new critical point.

ARK Applies for Case-Specific Exemption to Move Fund Shares On-Chain

This market movement is not unfounded. According to official documents released by the SEC on August 24th, ARK Venture Fund and ARK Investment Management formally applied to amend their previous exemptive order.

As early as last year, ARK had already received a relevant exemption from the SEC, allowing it to adopt a Multi-Class Fund Share Structure. However, in the initial design, the shares were neither listed on exchanges nor planned to form a secondary trading market.

The main upgrade in this application is the addition of two major share classes: one is an "Exchange Class" that can be listed on a national securities exchange; the other is a "Tokenized Class" that uses Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to record ownership, which is the key item in the application.

According to the application design, tokenized shares can be traded both through regulated Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) and via other quotation mechanisms, and are also allowed for peer-to-peer transfers between eligible wallets.

However, the prerequisite for free circulation is strict compliance: the fund and its Transfer Agent must complete KYC/AML (Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering) verification on wallets holding tokenized shares. Only wallets approved and whitelisted are permitted to hold the relevant assets.

In essence, this design is building a "regulated on-chain securities market": connecting the legal rights, transfer registration, and compliance checks of traditional funds with the account system and settlement capabilities of the blockchain.

It's important to clarify that tokenized shares are fundamentally still traditional fund shares, falling under the category of securities. Here, the blockchain primarily serves as infrastructure for functions like ownership recording and transfer. The SEC has previously emphasized that tokenization itself does not change the legal nature of a security.

In theory, such on-chain fund shares could in the future be integrated with stablecoins, lending protocols, and other on-chain financial products, creating financial combinations difficult to achieve in traditional markets.

However, risks also exist: traditional funds are redeemed at the daily net asset value (NAV), while tokenized shares, when traded on secondary markets, may trade at prices deviating from the fund's NAV. ARK also states in its application document that transaction prices on exchanges, ATS, or in peer-to-peer trades may differ from the fund's net asset value.

It must be emphasized that ARK's application for a case-specific exemption is still under regulatory review and is not the same mechanism as the universal innovation relief being planned by the SEC. SEC documents show that interested parties can request a hearing before September 18th. If the SEC does not hold a hearing, it typically announces the application result or next steps shortly thereafter.

From Investing in Tokenization Service Providers to ARK's Direct Involvement

If the application is approved and ARK successfully navigates the path, the entire traditional asset management industry will gain a standardized reference route.

ARK Venture Fund is a continuously offered closed-end Interval Fund under Cathie Wood's ARK, established in 2022. It advocates for "democratizing venture capital," with a subscription threshold of only $500 for ordinary investors. Its portfolio is concentrated in some of the world's most significant private tech unicorns, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Figure AI, chip startup Tenstorrent, and SpaceX before its potential IPO.

However, constrained by the traditional interval fund structure, investors cannot freely transfer or exit on a daily basis. They must rely on the fund's quarterly open periods offering a fixed 5% repurchase quota for proportional liquidation. This liquidity cycle is clearly mismatched with the high turnover demand typical of tech equity investments. ARK's application may be aimed precisely at resolving this pain point.

More critically, ARK is already a deep participant in tokenization infrastructure. Last year, ARK Venture Fund invested approximately $10 million in the RWA infrastructure platform Securitize, which currently provides tokenization services for leading asset managers like BlackRock, Apollo, and Hamilton Lane.

From investing in a tokenization service provider to applying to tokenize its own fund shares, ARK's actions represent a consistent extension of its strategy: from building on-chain infrastructure to personally piloting products.

This is also why ARK's application has drawn attention. It signifies that the approach of traditional asset managers participating on-chain is transitioning from the 1.0 stage of "issuing on-chain assets" to the 2.0 stage of "putting fund shares on-chain." In the past, asset managers entering crypto mainly issued tokenized assets; in the future, they may be able to turn the funds they manage themselves into on-chain assets that are transferable and composable.

Asset Management On-Chain in Three Stages: The True Watershed Still Lies Ahead

This year, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has stated multiple times the intent to establish a more suitable new regulatory framework for blockchain-based trading.

In March, he mentioned that the SEC was considering introducing an innovation relief to facilitate limited trading of certain tokenized securities, with clear time and scope limits to gain practical experience before forming long-term rules. In April, he further indicated that the innovation relief mechanism was close to being launched.

However, this process has not materialized as the market expected. The originally planned announcement was postponed after the SEC canceled its scheduled meeting on August 14th.

Securitize President Brett Redfearn pointed out that an important reason for the delay is regulatory concern that the policy might affect the progress of the congressional "Clarity Act." The innovation relief will likely need to wait until related legislation makes progress before landing, with a potential timeframe around early October.

Nevertheless, from a longer-term evolutionary perspective, the on-chain migration of the US traditional asset management industry appears to be unfolding in "three stages."

The first stage is the product validation period. Represented by tokenized fund products like BlackRock's BUIDL and Franklin Templeton's BENJI, this stage proved that within the current securities regulatory framework, fund products can undergo tokenization, and on-chain shares possess legal foundations and practical feasibility.

The second stage is the case-specific pilot period. ARK's application is the latest development on this front. Through case-specific exemptions, the SEC allows asset managers like ARK to explore broader on-chain share trading, testing practical issues like secondary market circulation, peer-to-peer transfers, and compliance boundaries, thereby accumulating experience for universal rules.

The third stage is the framework implementation period. If the innovation relief is officially launched in the future, more tokenized securities will enter the on-chain market within limited scopes, and leading asset managers like Fidelity, WisdomTree, and likely BlackRock will probably expand their tokenized fund product lines.

Of course, variables exist in all scenarios: whether ARK's application is approved, whether congressional legislation progresses, and when the innovation relief lands—each step carries uncertainty.

The trend is gradually becoming clear: after assets go on-chain, shares will follow. The true industry watershed will likely only commence after "shares go on-chain."

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is ARK seeking to achieve with its exemption request to the SEC?

AARK is seeking to amend its existing SEC exemption to introduce new share classes for its ARK Venture Fund. This includes an 'Exchange Class' listed on a national exchange and, most notably, a 'Tokenized Class' that utilizes Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to record ownership. This would allow the tokenized shares to be traded on regulated Alternative Trading Systems (ATS), other quotation mechanisms, or peer-to-peer between compliant wallets.

QHow does ARK's proposed tokenized share class differ from traditional fund shares in terms of transferability?

AUnlike the traditional shares of its interval fund, which primarily rely on quarterly repurchase offers for liquidity, the proposed tokenized share class is designed for much greater transferability. It can be traded on secondary markets (like ATSs) or transferred peer-to-peer between pre-approved wallets that have passed KYC/AML checks, potentially providing investors with more frequent liquidity opportunities.

QWhat is the significance of ARK moving from investing in tokenization service providers to applying for tokenizing its own fund shares?

AIt signifies a strategic evolution in how traditional asset managers are engaging with blockchain technology. ARK's move from being an investor in infrastructure (like Securitize) to applying to tokenize its own fund shares represents a shift from the '1.0 phase' of issuing tokenized assets (e.g., bonds) to the '2.0 phase' of putting the actual fund shares themselves on-chain, making the fund a native, transferable, and composable on-chain asset.

QWhat are the 'three phases' of traditional asset managers moving on-chain as outlined in the article?

AThe three phases are: 1) **Product Validation Phase**: Proving tokenized funds (like BlackRock's BUIDL) are viable under current rules. 2) **Case-by-Case Pilot Phase**: Where SEC grants individual exemptions (like ARK's request) to test wider on-chain trading and compliance. 3) **Framework Implementation Phase**: When the SEC's anticipated broad 'innovative exemption' framework is launched, allowing many more tokenized securities to enter the on-chain market under defined rules.

QWhat is the current status of the SEC's broader 'innovative exemption' framework for tokenized securities, and why has it been delayed?

AThe SEC's broader 'innovative exemption' framework, intended to facilitate limited trading of tokenized securities, has been delayed and not yet launched. According to Securitize's president, a key reason for the delay is regulatory concern that moving forward with this exemption could affect the progress of the Congressional 'Clarity Act' legislation. The framework is now likely to be launched only after related legislative progress is made, potentially around early October.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

The Silicon Valley AI Power Crunch: Compute is King Silicon Valley's race for AI dominance has devolved into a desperate scramble for computing power. The situation has become so extreme that even top executives are resorting to unusual measures. Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei was reportedly turned down by Meta's Mark Zuckerberg when seeking additional GPU resources, leading to a deal where SpaceX acts as a broker, reselling Nvidia GPUs to Anthropic. This venture reportedly generated $2.561 billion in quarterly AI revenue for SpaceX. The shortage is reshaping the industry's dynamics, creating a new "compute economy" where GPU access is the ultimate currency. This scarcity is causing internal strife at major firms and altering competitive landscapes. A high-profile example is Noam Shazeer, a key AI scientist whom Google re-hired for $2.7 billion, only for him to leave for OpenAI reportedly due to insufficient compute resources for his team. Similar frustrations over resource allocation have been cited within Google and DeepMind. For AI startups, the challenge is existential. Cloud providers are now demanding multi-year contracts with large upfront payments, making flexible, on-demand access nearly impossible. This has spurred innovative workarounds, including a new market for "global compute prospecting"—companies scavenging for underutilized server capacity worldwide—and venture capital firms like Y Combinator and Radical Ventures directly acquiring and allocating GPU clusters for their portfolio companies. The root causes are complex: explosive growth in AI model complexity and the shift from simple chatbots to persistent "Agent" systems dramatically increase compute demands. While tech giants are building new data centers, supply cannot keep pace with immediate needs. Rental prices for critical chips like the Nvidia H100 have surged nearly 40% in months. The consequence is a consolidation of power. Compute access is becoming the definitive barrier to entry, significantly strengthening large companies with their own infrastructure and creating a lucrative "picks and shovels" market for those who control the hardware supply. In today's Silicon Valley, compute isn't just a resource—it's the foundation of survival and competitive advantage.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Even Losing Money Requires Waiting in Line, How Far Can PaperTrade's 1000x Leverage Experiment Go?

PaperTrade, a synthetic perpetual contract platform built on HyperEVM, launched on October 10th. Its defining feature is offering up to 1000x leverage and rewarding users with its native token, PAPER, for trading losses or liquidations—a mechanism dubbed "losing money to mine." This sparked initial frenzy, with users queuing to execute trades and generate losses for PAPER rewards. Within 24 hours, nominal trading volume exceeded $678 billion. The platform operates without traditional order books; users trade directly against a shared USDC liquidity pool. Profits are paid from this pool, but if insufficient funds exist, payments queue on a first-in, first-out basis. PAPER has zero initial supply, minted solely from qualifying user losses, and can be staked for a share of protocol revenue. However, controversies emerged quickly. Smaller orders faced longer execution queues compared to larger ones. More critically, PaperTrade's reliance on Hyperliquid's mid-price for asset pricing made it vulnerable to market manipulation. Reports indicated that actors potentially moved prices on Hyperliquid to profit from large, highly leveraged positions on PaperTrade. The team acknowledged this as a known risk, exacerbated by high initial position limits, and has since tightened limits to reduce the attack surface. After the initial surge, open interest and margin deposited have significantly declined. The platform's long-term viability hinges on whether the value and revenue share from PAPER can justify the initial "loss-mining" strategy for users, moving beyond speculative hype to sustainable returns.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Even Losing Money Requires Waiting in Line, How Far Can PaperTrade's 1000x Leverage Experiment Go?

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

XRP Ledger defends emergency patch for unlimited XRP bug

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) development team defended its decision to enact an emergency security patch on September 25, bypassing the network's usual two-week validator voting process. The patch fixed a critical integer overflow bug, present since 2015, which could have been exploited to create unlimited XRP beyond the network's fixed supply. Developers argued that the normal amendment process would have publicly exposed the flaw for weeks, posing a severe security risk. This expedited fix, triggered by a bug bounty report, led to debates about XRPL's decentralization. Critics, including Cyber Capital founder Justin Bons, argued that the coordinated upgrade and temporary withholding of source code demonstrated centralized control, contradicting claims that XRP is not a security. In response, the XRPL Foundation, RippleX, core developers, and validators stated the decision was a collective assessment of the bug's severity, and that no single entity could force the update. Independent validators like XRP Kuwait emphasized that coordination among operators does not equate to loss of independence. The vulnerability report clarified the bug existed in the payment engine and could only be triggered by deliberately constructed offers, with no evidence of exploitation on public networks. The patch version later became officially required through a normal amendment vote with over 80% validator support.

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

XRP Ledger defends emergency patch for unlimited XRP bug

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片