Historical Bottom Signal Reappears? Messari Valued at $300 Million Sells for $10 Million

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-17Actualizado a 2026-06-17

Resumen

Messari, a major crypto data and research platform once valued at $300 million, was sold to rival Blockworks for just over $10 million in June 2026. This sale marks a broader, quiet contraction in the crypto industry. Data platforms like DappRadar and Parsec have shut down, media outlets like CoinDesk have been sold at steep discounts, and companies across the sector are laying off staff or pivoting to AI, which is disrupting traditional research and data business models. Venture capital investment in crypto has plummeted, with funding in Q1 2026 at its lowest since 2020, as capital and talent shift aggressively toward AI. Prominent crypto investors are leaving the space, and many funds are struggling. However, these extreme pessimism signals may historically indicate a market bottom. Bitcoin is down nearly 50% from its 2026 high, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index has been in "extreme fear" for months, and long-term Bitcoin holders control a near-record 80% of the supply. Similar combinations of deeply negative signals—including low VC activity and distressed asset sales—preceded major bull markets in 2018, 2020, and 2022. While Messari's downfall symbolizes a tough period, it also aligns with patterns seen at cycle lows.

Author: BibiNews

Messari was once the data platform in the crypto industry closest to Bloomberg, with a peak valuation of $300 million USD.

Its founder, Ryan Selkis, was one of the first to expose Mt. Gox's insolvency, establishing his reputation with this feat before founding Messari with the goal of consolidating the crypto world's data, research, and disclosures into a professional platform. It covers over 40,000 crypto assets, and its annual Mainnet conference in New York is one of the industry's most important summits.

In September 2022, the crypto arm of hedge fund giant Brevan Howard led its Series B funding round, with Point72 and Coinbase Ventures participating, valuing the company at approximately $300 million.

On June 12, 2026, Messari was acquired by competitor Blockworks for a price just over ten million dollars.

This is not the situation of just one company. When primary market valuations and the tokens in your wallet are both shrinking significantly, has the collective repricing of the entire crypto industry finally hit bottom?

Collective Contraction of Crypto Companies

In July 2024, Messari founder Selkis resigned as CEO following a series of controversial statements, with co-founder Eric Turner taking over. In March 2026, Turner also left, CTO Diran Li took the helm, and the company underwent significant layoffs, pivoting towards AI and announcing it would become an AI-first company.

But for Messari, AI is not just a pivot direction; it's also a reason for its decline. Messari's core product was selling research reports and data curation. An industry report that once took an analyst a week to write can now be completed in a few hours with AI tools. When research costs approach zero, the business of selling research reports becomes hard to monetize. This is not a cyclical difficulty but a structural threat.

Ultimately, Messari's data platform and API were merged into Blockworks, ending an eight-year entrepreneurial journey.

But Messari is not an isolated case.

From 2025 to 2026, a quieter, deeper change is underway: those companies that don't issue tokens and rely on selling products and services are also struggling to survive.

Data platforms are shutting down. DappRadar, after seven years of operation, tracking over 18,000 decentralized applications across 93 blockchains with 500,000 monthly active users, announced its closure in November 2025, citing "financial unsustainability." On-chain analytics platform Parsec, operational for five years, shut down in February 2026. CoinGecko is currently in talks for an outright sale and has hired investment bank Moelis as an advisor.

Media outlets are being sold for cheap or laying off staff. CoinDesk, the benchmark for crypto media, once rumored to be worth $300 million, cut 45% of its editorial team in August 2023 and was acquired by Bullish for approximately $75 million in November of the same year. Bankless, one of the most influential brands in crypto podcasts with over 1,300 episodes and a $35 million VC fund, quietly laid off most of its team in May of this year.

Blockworks, which acquired Messari, itself shut down its entire news department in October 2025, shifting all resources to its data business. Its founder stated bluntly: users increasingly use data as their primary source of information, not news.

On-chain data company Dune laid off 25% of its staff in May 2026.

VCs Have Stopped Investing

Since 2017, over 800 crypto-focused investment funds have been established globally. Today, only about half remain operational. In 2025, 63% of crypto hedge funds were unprofitable.

New funds are also unable to raise money. In Q1 2026, only 8 new crypto VC funds were established, the lowest number since Q3 2020, with fundraising volume at just 12% of the peak in 2022. From October 2025 to April 2026, monthly crypto VC investment plummeted from $3.85 billion to $660 million, a drop of over 80% in six months.

Where has the money gone? To AI. In 2025, VC funding in the AI sector reached $192.7 billion, surpassing half of the global VC total for the first time. A partner at Robot Ventures, a crypto fund founded by the Compound founder, made a direct statement: "AI is sucking out the oxygen; both talent and LPs' attention are being diverted. Many who should have been doing crypto startups are now starting AI companies."

People are leaving too. Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, managing $5.9 billion in assets and one of Solana's earliest and most steadfast institutional investors, announced his departure in February of this year to focus on AI and robotics.

He wrote in a later-deleted tweet: "Crypto isn't as interesting as many people (including myself) once thought." Even Paradigm, once one of the purest crypto VCs, has begun expanding its investment scope to include AI and robotics.

Those crypto VC funds from 2020 to 2022 invested heavily during periods of high valuations and have yet to return capital to their LPs. LPs are not re-upping, funds cannot raise new capital, startups cannot secure financing, products fail to materialize, leading to closures or fire sales. This is a complete transmission chain currently playing out the final steps in the crypto primary market.

A partner at Dragonfly Capital used a term to describe the current environment: the great extinction.

Perhaps, This is a Good Signal

Bitcoin has fallen from its high of $126,000 last October to around $65,000 currently, a drop of nearly 48%. Altcoin bubbles are rapidly clearing. Starknet, once valued at $8 billion, saw its market cap drop to $200 million, a 95% decline. Scroll, Wormhole, Magic Eden have all fallen over 95%. Over 70% of tokens issued between 2021 and 2022 are either worthless today or have fallen below one-tenth of their peak value.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropped to as low as 5 in February this year, 11 in March, and 13 in early June, remaining in the "Extreme Fear" zone for over 50 consecutive days.

Historically, this index has only fallen below 10 three times: December 2018, the March 2020 Covid crash, and November 2022 FTX collapse. Each time, Bitcoin subsequently surged over 500% within three years, with the most extreme being the 2018 case which saw a 2050% increase.

Another quieter signal comes from on-chain data: Bitcoin long-term holders currently control nearly 80% of the circulating supply. Although this proportion has been on a slow upward trend long-term, it has remained at elevated levels and continued to rise during the nearly 50% price correction from the $126,000 high, forming a clear divergence from price action. This means the remaining market mainly consists of long-term holders unwilling to sell.

Historically, when this proportion approaches or exceeds 75-80% accompanied by a deep price adjustment, it often corresponds to a bear market bottom area.

Looking at the primary market. The last time crypto VC deal count was this low was in 2020, just before DeFi Summer. The last time new fund formation was this low was also in 2020.

And Dragonfly Capital, which used the term "great extinction," raised a $650 million new crypto fund against the trend in February this year, exceeding its target by 30%. Its managing partner said: "Morale is low, fear is extreme, the gloom of the bear market has descended." But his action was to keep investing. The last time Dragonfly raised funds during peak market panic was in 2022; that fund invested in Polymarket and Ethena, becoming its best-performing fund historically.

Blockworks, which acquired Messari, just completed a funding round at a $192 million valuation on April 29, stating its purpose clearly: to consolidate the crypto data industry. It is not expanding its business but acquiring peers on the cheap.

Token prices halved, the fear index drops to single digits, long-term holder proportion nears extreme levels, VC deal count returns to five-year lows, infrastructure companies collectively shut down or sell for cheap. Viewed individually, each of these signals is pessimistic. But when they appear simultaneously, it has only happened three times in history, each followed by a new major cycle.

A fall from $300 million to $10 million looks like the end of an era. But every true bottom never looks like an opportunity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the main factors that led to Messari's decline and eventual acquisition for a fraction of its peak valuation?

AMessari's decline was driven by a combination of internal turmoil, a failed strategic pivot, and a structural threat to its core business. The company faced leadership instability, with its founder and his successor both resigning within two years. Its attempt to pivot to AI was undermined by the very technology it adopted, as AI tools drastically reduced the cost and value of the research reports Messari sold. This created a 'structural threat' to its primary revenue model. Ultimately, these factors led to its acquisition by competitor Blockworks for approximately $10 million, a sharp drop from its $300 million valuation in 2022.

QHow does the article describe the current state of the broader crypto infrastructure and media sector?

AThe article describes a sector undergoing a severe and widespread contraction. Data platforms like DappRadar and Parsec have shut down, while others like CoinGecko are seeking buyers. Media companies are being sold at deep discounts (e.g., CoinDesk) or conducting major layoffs (e.g., Bankless, Blockworks' own news division). Even data leader Dune has downsized. This signifies a 'quiet, deeper change' where companies not issuing tokens but selling services are also failing, indicating the downturn extends beyond market cycles to affect core industry infrastructure.

QWhat key indicators does the article cite to suggest the crypto market might be at or near a historical bottom?

AThe article cites several concurrent indicators reminiscent of past market bottoms: 1) Bitcoin's ~48% price drop from its recent high. 2) The Crypto Fear & Greed Index lingering in 'Extreme Fear' territory for over 50 days, a level historically followed by major rallies. 3) Bitcoin's Long-Term Holder supply approaching 80%, a level associated with bear market capitulation where weak hands have sold. 4) Crypto VC investment activity plummeting to levels last seen in 2020, just before the DeFi Summer bull run. The simultaneous occurrence of these signals has historically preceded new major cycles.

QAccording to the article, what impact has the rise of AI had on the crypto venture capital and startup landscape?

AThe rise of AI has significantly diverted capital, talent, and attention away from the crypto sector. In 2025, AI attracted over half of all global VC funding. This has made it difficult for crypto funds to raise new capital, with the number of new crypto VC funds hitting a multi-year low. Prominent crypto investors like Kyle Samani of Multicoin Capital are leaving the space for AI and robotics. A VC partner quoted in the article states that 'AI sucked away the oxygen,' capturing the focus of both Limited Partners (LPs) and entrepreneurs who might have otherwise built crypto companies.

QWhat contradictory actions by industry players does the article highlight as potential contrarian bullish signals?

AThe article highlights actions that contradict the prevailing pessimism, suggesting some players see opportunity. First, Dragonfly Capital raised a $650 million crypto fund *exceeding* its target during this period of low morale, just as it did successfully in 2022. Second, the acquirer of Messari, Blockworks, itself recently raised funding with the explicit goal of consolidating the struggling crypto data industry by buying distressed competitors at low prices. These moves indicate that certain experienced investors and firms are actively deploying capital to build or acquire assets when prices are depressed, a classic bottom-signaling behavior.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

Tencent's AI office assistant, WorkBuddy, has achieved daily active users (DAU) 3-4 times that of the industry's second-place product, primarily driven by non-technical users like HR, operations, and administrative staff. Its rapid growth, starting with a public beta in March 2026, highlights a key strategic divergence from competitors like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code. Unlike those tools, which originated as developer-focused assistants (in command lines or IDEs) and are now expanding towards office scenarios, WorkBuddy was built from the ground up for non-technical office workers. Its development was user-driven, initiated after腾讯云's team observed non-technical employees using their CodeBuddy coding tool for general tasks. WorkBuddy's design is defined by three core decisions aimed at lowering barriers: 1) Using natural language instead of technical concepts, so users describe their goal without needing to understand prompts or agents. 2) Providing pre-packaged "Skill" templates for common office tasks like data processing, content creation, and research. 3) Natively integrating into existing腾讯 ecosystems like腾讯 Docs and WeChat, making the agent a seamless part of the user's workflow rather than a separate tool. This "scenario encapsulation" approach, prioritizing the shortest path for users to get work done, contrasts with the "underlying capability" focus of Codex and Claude, which offer more flexibility but require more technical setup. Analysts confirm WorkBuddy's leading market position in China by mid-2026, with massive user and request growth following its launch. Recognizing the same trend of surging non-technical adoption, OpenAI and Anthropic are now pivoting their products with features like role-based plugins (Codex) and a simplified desktop interface (Claude Cowork). However, adapting tools built for developers requires significant changes to interaction models and integrations. WorkBuddy currently holds an estimated six-month lead in delivering a complete solution for non-technical office users. Its recently launched enterprise version aims to solidify this advantage. The competition underscores two valid paths: embedding agent capabilities directly into familiar work environments versus building powerful, general-purpose agents that users must learn to access. WorkBuddy's early success demonstrates the effectiveness of the former strategy for mainstream office adoption.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片