A significant amount of the liquidity that users contribute to decentralized exchanges isn’t really being used to speed up trades, according to a recent report by Dune.
To put things in perspective, concentrated liquidity was created to increase the capital efficiency of decentralized exchanges. This was done by enabling liquidity providers (LPs) to distribute funds within particular price ranges where trading is most likely to take place.
However, the study discovered that during the first half of 2026, an average of 29.4% of liquidity was outside the range of active trading. Thanks to the same, no trading fees were generated.
This amounted to approximately $542 million in idle capital per week and an estimated $150 million in lost annual fee income for liquidity providers across the four protocols.
For context, the 4 protocols included were Uniswap v3, Uniswap v4, PancakeSwap v3, and Aerodrome Slipstream.
Underutilized concentrated liquidity
Considering technically available but never used liquidity, about 85% of capital was underutilized.
The fact that more than $200 million in idle liquidity had not been repositioned in more than 90 days may be evidence that many LPs do not actively manage their holdings.
This also suggested that even though concentrated liquidity should increase efficiency, many LPs still find it difficult to maintain their positions in line with market prices.
Individual investors suffered the most
Additionally, the study discovered that automated managers maintained capital activity, while individual investors owned the majority of idle liquidity.
Wallets on Ethereum, for instance, had 94% of idle capital and 91% of Uniswap v3 liquidity. 92% of idle liquidity and 78% of liquidity were under control on Arbitrum. On Base, individual users oversaw 82% of the idle capital, even though smart contracts held roughly 50% of the liquidity.
This, because only 6.5% of their positions were out of range, compared to about 30% for wallets. This also indicated that automated managers have been far more successful than individual LPs at maintaining liquidity.
Additional loopholes
Finally, the study found that the idle liquidity issue has not been resolved by Uniswap v4.
Like Uniswap v3, about 30.5% of its liquidity is still out of range even after hooks were added that might allow idle capital to be used in external yield strategies.
Also, just 10% of v4’s TVL actually uses hooks while none of them produce yield from idle liquidity at the moment.
Final Summary
- In H1 2026, approx. 29.5% of liquidity was outside the range of active trading.
- Instead of AMMs, individual investors owned the majority of idle liquidity.
