FTX Founder Sam Bankman‑Fried Pushes For New Trial In New York

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has filed a pro se motion in a New York federal court requesting a new trial. He argues that new witness testimony could undermine the prosecution's case and challenge key aspects of the narrative that led to his conviction. Bankman-Fried, who is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for fraud and other charges, continues to dispute the legitimacy of FTX's bankruptcy. He claims the company was not insolvent and alleges that lawyers initiated bankruptcy proceedings for their own financial benefit without his authorization. This motion is a separate attempt to reopen the case alongside his ongoing appeal.

Sam Bankman‐Fried, the co-founder and former chief executive of collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has filed a request for a new trial in New York on Tuesday, arguing that fresh witness testimony could undermine the government’s case against him.

Bid To Revive FTX Trial

As reported by Bloomberg, the motion, dated February 5 and entered into the docket on Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, was submitted pro se, meaning Bankman‐Fried is acting on his own behalf rather than through legal counsel.

In the filing, Bankman‐Fried contends that testimony from new witnesses could challenge key aspects of the prosecution’s narrative and potentially cast doubt on the verdict. He argues that this evidence was not previously presented and could materially affect the outcome of the case.

The motion does not replace his ongoing appeal but represents an additional attempt to reopen the proceedings. The request follows comments Bankman‐Fried made earlier on Tuesday on social media in which he again disputed the legitimacy of FTX’s bankruptcy.

Bankman‐Fried Denies Insolvency Issues

From prison, he has increasingly advanced the argument that the company’s collapse was driven by legal and financial maneuvering rather than criminal wrongdoing.

He claimed that FTX was not insolvent and said he never authorized a bankruptcy filing, alleging instead that lawyers assumed control of the company and quickly initiated bankruptcy proceedings for their own financial benefit.

Bankman‐Fried was convicted on all seven counts he faced, including fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, in the case United States v. Bankman‐Fried.

On March 28, 2024, the court sentenced him to 25 years in federal prison and ordered him to forfeit approximately $11 billion, reflecting the scale of losses tied to the collapse of FTX.

The 1-D chart shows the exchange’s native token, FTT, trending upwards on Tuesday. Source: FTTUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Sam Bankman-Fried requesting in the New York court, and on what grounds?

ASam Bankman-Fried is requesting a new trial, arguing that fresh witness testimony could undermine the government's case against him and challenge key aspects of the prosecution's narrative.

QHow was the motion for a new trial filed, and what does this indicate about Bankman-Fried's legal representation?

AThe motion was filed pro se, meaning Bankman-Fried submitted it on his own behalf without the use of his legal counsel.

QWhat argument has Bankman-Fried been making from prison regarding the collapse of FTX?

AHe has argued that FTX's collapse was driven by legal and financial maneuvering rather than criminal wrongdoing, claiming the company was not insolvent and that lawyers initiated bankruptcy for their own financial benefit.

QWhat was the final outcome of the United States v. Bankman-Fried case?

AHe was convicted on all seven counts, including fraud and money laundering, and was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison and ordered to forfeit approximately $11 billion.

QWhat does the article mention about the FTX token (FT) on the day the motion was filed?

AThe article includes a chart showing the FTX token, FTT, trending upwards on that Tuesday.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Bitcoin to NVIDIA: How Gate is Creating the 'All-in-One Trading Account' for the Web3 Era?

From Bitcoin to Nvidia: How Gate is Building an 'All-in-One Trading Account' for the Web3 Era This article explores the emerging trend of crypto exchanges expanding into multi-asset trading, focusing on Gate's strategy. It begins by highlighting a common pain point: crypto traders are often isolated from traditional financial markets (stocks, gold) due to slow, cumbersome cross-border fiat processes. The piece details Gate's systematic approach to solving this by building a complete ecosystem covering both Crypto and TradFi (traditional finance). Its solution spans three product types: tokenized assets (e.g., stock tokens), extended crypto derivatives (e.g., stock perpetual contracts), and, most notably, traditional CFDs (Contracts for Difference) accessed via an integrated MT5 system. This allows users to trade a wide array of assets—including metals, stocks, indices, forex, and commodities—directly with USDT. Key advantages identified are exceptional capital efficiency (near-instant transfers between crypto and TradFi sub-accounts) and competitive fee structures, especially for high-volume traders, where CFD costs can be significantly lower than traditional crypto derivatives. The author's firsthand test of trading gold CFDs revealed a fast, seamless experience but also noted learning curves, such as fixed leverage, swap fees for overnight positions, and adherence to traditional market hours. The article concludes by pondering the future of crypto exchanges, viewing multi-asset trading as a sign of the market integrating into the global financial system. It questions whether current CFD-based models are a final solution or a transitional step towards true asset tokenization (RWA) and awaits clearer regulatory frameworks for deeper integration.

Odaily星球日报Hace 4 min(s)

From Bitcoin to NVIDIA: How Gate is Creating the 'All-in-One Trading Account' for the Web3 Era?

Odaily星球日报Hace 4 min(s)

Matrixport Research: Bear Market Confirmed, The True Window for Bottom-Fishing May Not Have Arrived Yet

Bitcoin has broken below a key support level, confirming a bear market phase. Historical analysis suggests this correction aligns with past cycles, shifting focus from trend confirmation to identifying the next optimal accumulation window. The report, which previously identified the bull market start in October 2022 and projected a cycle top near $125,000, now indicates the market has entered a bearish phase. Key observations include Bitcoin falling below its one-year moving average in November 2025, a signal historically associated with bear markets lasting about 12 months. This projects the next bull market could start in Q4 2026, with a cycle low likely in Q3 2026. The analysis posits that Bitcoin's four-year cycle is more closely tied to the U.S. midterm election cycle (e.g., 2014, 2018, 2022, 2026) and its associated regulatory uncertainty, rather than being solely driven by halving events. From a technical perspective, key monthly indicators have not yet reached crucial thresholds that historically signal a bottom. The Monthly Stochastics, currently at ~39%, has not entered the deep oversold" zone below 15% where reversals typically occur. Similarly, the Monthly RSI, near 50, has not yet shown the classic "break below support followed by a rebound" reversal structure. The true cycle low often occurs during periods of low volume and fading selling pressure, not during high-volume capitulation events. The conclusion is that the final bear market low has likely not been reached. A sustainable recovery and the ideal window for re-entry will require patience, waiting for key monthly indicators to hit extreme levels and show confirmed reversal signals, rather than relying solely on price proximity to historical lows.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Matrixport Research: Bear Market Confirmed, The True Window for Bottom-Fishing May Not Have Arrived Yet

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Lost in Hong Kong

"Lost Hong Kong" explores the city's profound economic and social fragmentation, caught between its storied past and an uncertain future. Despite strong macroeconomic indicators—such as 3.2% GDP growth and a booming stock market—the reality for many residents is starkly different. Rising unemployment, widespread retail closures, and an exodus of locals seeking affordable services in mainland China reveal a deep divide between financial elites and ordinary citizens. This duality stems from Hong Kong’s "muscle memory" of past crises—the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and 2008 Global Financial Crisis—which entrenched a regulatory obsession with stability. This cautious approach has stifled innovation, particularly in fintech and Web3. Initiatives like virtual banks and crypto ETFs have struggled under heavy compliance burdens, while legacy systems like HSBC’s PayMe and the government-backed FPS dominate digital payments. The city’s economy is fractured along three lines: finance vs.实体经济, elites vs. the public, and asset accumulation vs. innovation. While wealth management flourishes, R&D investment lags behind peers like Singapore and Shenzhen. Hong Kong’s attempt to embrace disruptive technologies like Web3 has been half-hearted, favoring controlled, institutional adoption over genuine decentralization. Ultimately, Hong Kong’s reliance on outdated models hinders its ability to adapt. The article concludes that without bold structural changes, the city risks being left behind as a new era of global innovation accelerates.

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Matrixport Research Report | Re-evaluating the Long-Term Allocation Value of U.S. Stocks: Institutional Dividends, Industry Cycles, and Global Capital Resonance

Matrixport Research Report: Reassessing the Long-Term Allocation Value of U.S. Stocks — Institutional Advantages, Industry Cycle, and Global Capital in Sync The core of U.S. stocks' long-term allocation value lies in the convergence of three key drivers: institutional advantages, the real validation cycle of the AI industry, and structural capital inflows—rather than short-term macro trading opportunities. U.S. equity markets, particularly the Nasdaq, have significantly outperformed global peers like China’s创业板指 and恒生科技指数 from 2015 to 2025, with smaller drawdowns and stronger compound returns. This resilience stems from deep institutional strengths: a mature innovation financing ecosystem, corporate fiscal discipline, shareholder return mechanisms, and the dollar’s global liquidity role. The AI industry is transitioning from infrastructure expansion to application penetration. Real adoption is accelerating—78% of organizations reported using AI in 2024—and capital expenditure by AI-related U.S. firms has nearly doubled since 2019. This reflects tangible investment, not speculative valuation. Global institutional capital, particularly from Europe, has structurally increased allocation to U.S. equities, with overseas holdings rising ~48% over the past two years. The deep, liquid U.S. market offers concentrated exposure to leading tech and AI assets with high regulatory predictability and low transaction costs. While 2026 may see moderate rate cuts and fiscal policy debates, the long-term outlook remains robust. Short-term volatility may offer entry opportunities. The enduring value of U.S. stocks is anchored in this self-reinforcing system of institutional, technological, and capital advantages—making them a core holding for long-term investors.

MatrixportHace 23 min(s)

Matrixport Research Report | Re-evaluating the Long-Term Allocation Value of U.S. Stocks: Institutional Dividends, Industry Cycles, and Global Capital Resonance

MatrixportHace 23 min(s)

Matrixport Research: Bear Market Confirmed, the True Window for Bottom-Fishing May Not Have Arrived Yet

Matrixport Research confirms that the crypto market has entered a bear phase, with Bitcoin's recent break below a key support level signaling a confirmed downtrend. Historical cycle analysis suggests this correction aligns with typical bear market patterns in both scale and rhythm. The focus has now shifted from whether the trend has reversed to identifying the next optimal accumulation window. Key observations indicate that Bitcoin's break below its one-year moving average often marks the start of a bear market, which historically lasts about 12 months. This suggests the next bull cycle may not begin until Q4 2026, with a potential cycle low likely in Q3 2026. The report also posits that Bitcoin’s four-year cycle correlates more strongly with U.S. midterm election cycles than with halving events, citing heightened regulatory and political uncertainty as key drivers of market tops and bottoms. From a technical perspective, neither the monthly Stochastic oscillator (currently at ~39%) nor the monthly RSI (near 50) has yet reached key oversold thresholds that historically signaled major bottoms. A clear reversal confirmation—typically occurring after a break below extreme levels—has not appeared. The report concludes that the final market low has likely not been reached and emphasizes the need for patience. A sustainable recovery should be confirmed by clear signals of exhausted selling momentum, not just proximity to perceived low prices.

MatrixportHace 24 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros