Netting $2.4 Million: These 9 Insider Addresses Knew the US-Iran War Best

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-25Actualizado a 2026-05-25

Resumen

On May 18th, Bubblemaps investigators disclosed the discovery of nine highly correlated anonymous accounts on Polymarket that netted over $2.4 million from prediction markets tied to US military actions, with a 98% win rate. The accounts focused almost exclusively on the 2026 US-Iran conflict, placing bets with uncanny precision days before key events like the "Operation Epic Fury" strike on February 28th, which eliminated Iran's Supreme Leader. Bubblemaps' analysis linked four core accounts—each profiting around $400k—and five others through synchronized timing, transaction patterns, and fund flows. The money moved through shared wallet networks, suggesting professional obfuscation. This case is six times larger than the earlier prosecution of US Army Sergeant Gannon Van Dyke for insider trading on Polymarket. While platforms like Polymarket have established AI monitoring and explicit rules against trading on stolen or confidential information, the incident has spurred controversial "insider copy-trading" services that help users follow high-success accounts, raising new regulatory questions.

Written by: Mahe, Foresight News

On May 18, Nicolas Vaiman, founder of Bubblemaps, and lead investigator Deebs (a pseudonym used by a former U.S. military officer for safety reasons) disclosed to the public: they discovered nine highly correlated anonymous accounts on Polymarket that collectively netted over $2.4 million from prediction markets related to U.S. military actions, with a winning rate as high as 98%.

Bubblemaps provided a detailed analysis of these accounts on Twitter. They almost exclusively bet on military events related to the US-Iran conflict in 2026, with timing so precise it was chilling—often placing bets just days before key actions occurred, and favoring long-odds, low-probability options.

This wasn't simply "good luck." After visualizing the trades in the "Will the US strike Iran for the first time before February 28?" market on Polymarket, Bubblemaps discovered a massive pink cluster previously unmentioned on the X platform.

Further investigation linked the initial 4 accounts to another 5 through identical time windows, trade sizes, and fund flow paths. The nine accounts followed highly consistent funding paths: funds were transferred via centralized exchanges into a shared wallet network within an extremely short timeframe, with suspected use of professional services to hide traces.

4 Core Accounts Each Earned $400,000

In the early morning of February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched large-scale joint strikes codenamed "Operation Epic Fury" and "Lion's Roar." US-Israeli forces conducted nearly 900 strikes against Iran within 12 hours, targeting nuclear facilities, missile bases, military command centers, and hideouts of senior leaders. Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several of his family members, along with senior commanders of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, were killed in the initial strikes.

As early as the day of the February 28 strikes, Bubblemaps had publicly flagged six "fresh" accounts. Most of these accounts were created and funded within 24 hours before the strike, accurately betting on "the US will strike Iran before February 28," collectively netting about $1 million (some reports said $1.2 million). At the time, market odds were extremely low, yet these accounts heavily bet on them. Bubblemaps called it "suspected insider trading."

Five months later, the nine-account cluster they discovered was larger and had a higher win rate.

The four core accounts were created a few days before February 28, each earning about $400,000; the subsequent five accounts were linked through fund flows and trade overlaps. The nine accounts placed over 80 bets, almost all on US military actions: the first strike on February 28, the specific timing of Khamenei's elimination, the announcement of a ceasefire agreement, etc. They even placed bets spread across multiple dates to maximize gains, while occasionally placing one or two small losing bets (like on February 20), likely as cover.

Bubblemaps listed the nine Polymarket wallet addresses (including 0x09d3273fa76282ce09f4f35a87d6f087c05f4e84, etc.), emphasizing that these accounts have long dominated the profit/loss leaderboards. Funds ultimately flowed to a shared wallet network, showing signs of professionalized money laundering or service use.

Vaiman stated bluntly: "Luck cannot explain these numbers." Deebs added that potential insider sources are numerous—government officials, military planners, intelligence analysts, even family members of military personnel.

Earlier this year, US Army Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke was charged with using classified intelligence to bet on special operations in Venezuela on Polymarket, investing $34,000 to profit $400,000 before quickly withdrawing funds and attempting to delete the account. Polymarket cooperated closely with law enforcement, ultimately leading to the prosecution. The Van Dyke case is seen as a landmark case for insider trading in prediction markets.

This nine-account cluster's profit is six times that amount, with a higher win rate, and is entirely concentrated on US-Iran military events.

Bubblemaps exclusively shared the investigation with "60 Minutes." The segment aired on the evening of May 17, garnering significant attention. The CBS report noted that Polymarket has established AI monitoring and blockchain forensics systems, reporting suspicious activities to law enforcement authorities once detected, and emphasized that "insider trading is not welcome on the platform."

As of publication, Bubblemaps has not directly linked the nine accounts to any specific entity or government agency, stating only that "the correlation and near-perfect win rate raise serious suspicions."

Fighting Insider Trading vs. Copying Insider Trading

Insider trading makes many market participants feel the game is unfair. Prediction market platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket, are taking more measures to combat it.

In late March this year, Polymarket updated its market integrity rules for its DeFi platform and its US exchange regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The updated rules clarify three core prohibited insider trading behaviors:

Trading using stolen confidential information—Participants may not trade any contracts if they possess confidential information about the outcome or likely outcome of an underlying event, and using that information would breach a pre-existing duty of trust or confidence owed to another person or entity.
Prohibition on trading using illegal insider tips—Participants may not trade using confidential information provided to them by another person, if the information was provided by someone who owed a pre-existing duty of trust or confidence to another, and the participant knows or has reason to know that the person providing the information themselves would be prohibited from trading on it.
Trading by those able to influence the outcome—Participants may not trade any contracts if they have authority or influence sufficient to affect the outcome of the underlying event.

However, rules always have loopholes. Since insider trading cannot be completely eradicated, some ill-intentioned so-called "insider copy-trading projects" have also sparked controversy. These applications compile trading accounts with abnormally high win rates for users, or flag suspiciously timed, abnormally sized trades, helping users copy these trades with one click.

Kreo's selling point is helping users "find insider traders before others." Polycool directly posts a "Polymarket Insider Trading Guide" on its website, stating "This isn't the stock market, betting with non-public information won't land you in jail, the rules for decentralized prediction markets are completely different."

A question then arises: does copying trades from insider trading addresses constitute a violation?

There has been no official response yet.

However, so-called "insider copy-trading platforms" like PolyGUN and Polycule have suffered hacker attacks this year, incurring losses ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did Bubblemaps investigators discover about a group of anonymous accounts on Polymarket?

ABubblemaps investigators discovered nine highly correlated anonymous accounts that collectively netted over $2.4 million from prediction markets related to US military actions, with a win rate of 98%. They were primarily focused on US-Iran conflict events in 2026.

QAccording to the article, what characteristics made the trading activity of these nine accounts highly suspicious?

AThe accounts were highly suspicious because they placed bets almost exclusively on US-Iran military events, their timing was unnervingly precise (often days before key actions), they preferred low-odds, long-term options, and they used shared wallet networks and professional services to obscure fund flows.

QWhat is the name of the US soldier mentioned in the article who was charged for insider trading on Polymarket, and what was his profit?

AThe US soldier mentioned is US Army Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke. He was charged for using classified intelligence to bet on a Venezuelan special operations event on Polymarket, investing $34,000 and making a profit of $400,000.

QWhat are the three core types of prohibited insider trading behaviors outlined in Polymarket's updated market integrity rules?

AThe three core prohibited behaviors are: 1) Trading using stolen confidential information. 2) Trading using illegal insider information provided by someone who breached a duty of trust. 3) Trading by individuals who have the authority or influence to affect the outcome of the event.

QWhat controversial practice related to potential insider trading has emerged on prediction market platforms according to the article?

AThe controversial practice is the emergence of 'insider copy-trading' platforms or applications. These services identify accounts with suspiciously high win rates or anomalous trades, allowing users to copy their bets, essentially attempting to profit from potential insider information.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

The AI industry is witnessing an unprecedented concentration of capital into a handful of leading players, signaling what insiders call the "eve of a final shakeout." A staggering funding surge exceeding $7 billion hit just three Chinese companies in May alone—Kimi, StepFun (接近完成融资), and DeepSeek—with the latter's valuation reaching $45-$50 billion. Globally, giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX (set to merge with xAI) are preparing for public listings, collectively eyeing valuations over $3 trillion. This capital is no longer fueling a broad "hundred-model war" but is being funneled to "refuel" the final few contenders, following a sector-wide attrition rate exceeding 90%. This frenzy is driven by a fundamental shift in industry logic. The focus has moved from比拼模型智商 (competing on model intelligence) to "token factory economics." The explosion of long-context AI agents has massively increased token consumption per task. With token supply constrained by bottlenecks in HBM memory and power infrastructure—key factors in production costs—dominance now hinges on owning and efficiently operating large-scale compute resources. Major tech firms are investing hundreds of billions annually in this AI "power grid." Consequently, competition pivots to three core areas: 1) **Monetization** as the "AGI premium" cools, forcing a shift from user growth to revenue; 2) **Cost efficiency**, where reducing inference costs becomes the ultimate KPI as model capabilities commoditize; and 3) **Strategic path divergence** between enterprise-focused AI (prioritizing integration and reliability) and consumer-facing applications (betting on scale and user engagement). The message is clear: the final capital injections are determining the endgame lineup. Success will depend not just on technical prowess, but on transforming technology into a sustainable, profitable business model with demonstrable return on massive compute investments.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

A massive wave of IPOs from AI giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX is taking shape, potentially reshaping the U.S. stock market. OpenAI is reportedly preparing for a historic IPO, targeting a valuation over $1 trillion and raising roughly $60 billion, which would dwarf previous records. Anthropic is also advancing its own IPO plans, projecting significant revenue growth and achieving quarterly operating profit. However, their financial profiles starkly differ. While Anthropic is nearing profitability with a focus on enterprise clients, OpenAI continues to report substantial losses, with a negative operating margin and expectations for positive cash flow only by 2029-2030. Analysts warn these listings could trigger a major "passive fund reshuffle," forcing index funds to sell holdings in established tech giants to make room for the new entrants, potentially pressuring the broader market. Some observers view the IPO rush as a "risk transfer," allowing early private investors to cash out at peak valuations while passing future financial uncertainty to public market investors. The divergent paths of Anthropic's near-term profitability versus OpenAI's long-term, high-cost growth narrative present a critical choice for investors. The outcome of these IPOs is seen as a major swing factor for risk assets in 2026, testing whether this surge marks a new cycle or a potential peak.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

Kevin Warsh, with a personal fortune exceeding $130 million, became the 112nd and wealthiest Chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve on May 22nd. A former Wall Street investment banker and key figure during the 2008 financial crisis, Warsh lacks a traditional academic background for a central banker but brings deep market experience. He proposes an unconventional policy approach of simultaneously reducing the Fed's balance sheet ("quantitative tightening") while cutting interest rates, arguing that a smaller balance sheet would allow for more effective rate policy. His ascent marks a potential regime change at the Fed. Warsh aims to reform the institution's decision-making processes, tighten communication discipline among officials, and reduce reliance on forward guidance like the "dot plot." This shift responds to the Fed's current dilemma: fiscal policy is expanding the government's balance sheet through deficits, while monetary policy's ability to shrink its own $6.7 trillion balance sheet is severely constrained, creating pressure on long-term interest rates. Analysts expect Warsh's tenure to sustain high volatility in the U.S. Treasury market due to persistent supply pressures. Furthermore, his leadership coincides with a gradual, structural erosion of dollar dominance, evidenced by its declining share in global reserves and cracks in the petrodollar system, with increased use of alternatives like the Chinese yuan in oil trade. For investors, this environment underscores the importance of portfolio diversification, including assets like gold and Chinese sovereign bonds, amid a fluctuating dollar credit anchor.

链捕手Hace 27 min(s)

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

链捕手Hace 27 min(s)

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar WAR

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar WAR (WAR) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar WAR (WAR) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu WAR (WAR)Después de comprar tu WAR (WAR), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear WAR (WAR)Tradear fácilmente con WAR (WAR) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

147 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.04.28

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de WAR (WAR).