Russian Woman Loses Over 1 Million Rubles in Fake Crypto Investments

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-18Actualizado a 2026-08-18

Resumen

A Russian woman lost over 1 million rubles (approximately 750,000 rubles of which was a bank loan) to a cryptocurrency investment scam. The victim saw an online advertisement in early June, registered on a purported crypto exchange website, and was contacted by a fake broker. Convinced by initial fake profits shown in her account, she transferred more savings and even took out a loan over two months. When she attempted to withdraw funds, the platform demanded additional verification fees. After she refused, her account was blocked and the "broker" disappeared. The woman reported the crime to police in Ulyanovsk, and a criminal case for fraud has been initiated. This follows a similar incident where a 47-year-old woman from Salekhard lost 9.4 million rubles after engaging with fake crypto "experts" on Telegram.

On June 3, the woman saw an online advertisement about an opportunity to earn money through investments on a cryptocurrency trading exchange. The Russian woman clicked the link and registered on the website, after which she received a call from an unknown person who introduced himself as a broker.

The interlocutor explained how to make money on cryptocurrencies and suggested making an initial deposit. Soon after transferring a small amount, the figures in the Ulyanovsk resident's personal account showed a profit. This prompted her to continue investing money.

The fake broker persuaded her to transfer her remaining savings and then take out a bank loan. Over two months, the woman transferred 1.046 million rubles. Of this sum, 750,000 rubles were borrowed as a loan.

The "cryptocurrency investment specialist" remained in contact, gave instructions, and insisted on new investments until his client decided to withdraw money from the platform. The Russian woman was met on the website with a notice demanding additional verification and payment of a transfer fee. After the woman refused to comply with these conditions, her account was blocked, and the fake broker stopped answering calls and messages.

Realizing she had become a victim of fraudsters, the woman contacted the police. The Investigative Department for the Leninsky District of Ulyanovsk initiated a criminal case under Article 159 of the Russian Criminal Code, "Fraud."

Previously, a 47-year-old resident of Salekhard lost 9.4 million rubles after communicating in Telegram with unknown persons who introduced themselves as cryptocurrency investment experts. The fraudsters promised rapid capital growth, high returns, and no risk.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the initial scam that the Russian woman fell for?

AShe saw an online advertisement about earning money through a cryptocurrency exchange and was contacted by a person posing as a broker.

QHow did the fake broker convince the woman to keep investing more money?

AAfter she made a small initial deposit, the numbers in her account showed a fake profit, which motivated her to continue investing.

QWhat was the total amount the woman lost, and how much of it was borrowed?

AShe lost a total of 1,046 million rubles, of which 750,000 rubles was borrowed as a bank loan.

QWhat happened when the woman tried to withdraw money from the platform?

AThe website displayed a message requiring additional verification and a transfer commission fee. After she refused, her account was blocked and the fake broker stopped all communication.

QWhat legal action was taken after the woman realized she was scammed?

AShe reported the crime to the police, and the Investigative Department for the Leninsky District of Ulyanovsk opened a criminal case under Article 159 of the Russian Criminal Code for 'Fraud'.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

Cryptocurrency analysis platform CryptoQuant reports that Bitcoin is approaching a critical level based on the MVRV Z-Score indicator, but the current situation does not yet confirm the start of a new bull market. The Z-Score is nearing its 365-day moving average, a key level that has historically signaled a market regime shift. Historically, a sustained break above this 365-day moving average signaled a transition from a recovery phase to an expansion phase, preceding major bull markets in 2017 and 2020-2021. Currently, however, the indicator remains below this average. A confirmed break and hold above it could signal renewed unrealized network profit and the start of a new growth period. Conversely, a rejection from this level might indicate insufficient overall market profitability to support a broader bull rally. The analysis notes a key difference from past cycles: during previous major cyclical lows, the MVRV Z-Score fell below zero into undervalued territory, which has not occurred in the recent correction. This could suggest Bitcoin is undergoing a structurally shallower correction or that a capitulation event on the scale of past macro lows is not yet complete. Additionally, the Z-Score has formed lower peaks in each successive cycle, indicating that market valuation excesses are becoming more constrained over time even if price reaches new highs. For a bullish scenario to materialize, according to CryptoQuant, the MVRV Z-Score must recover and sustain above its 365-day moving average. A bounce rejection would suggest the market is in a "recovery" mode, while a return of the indicator toward zero could reinforce the view that the current correction is not yet over.

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

**Summary of "Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: 3.96% vs 7.7% from the Same Curator"** This article analyzes a yield opportunity on Morpho, a permissionless lending protocol, where depositors can bypass curated vaults to directly supply stablecoins to individual lending pools for higher returns. The core observation is a significant yield gap: a conservative vault managed by "Steakhouse Financial" offers a 7-day average APY of 3.96%, while its higher-risk vault offers 5.09%. Meanwhile, directly depositing into a specific pool (USDC / PT-reUSD-10DEC2026), which several professional vaults like Steakhouse also invest in, yields approximately 7.7%. This ~3.7 percentage point premium compensates depositors for assuming the specific collateral risk (a structured asset expiring Dec 10, 2026) and forgoing the diversification, monitoring, and emergency actions provided by vault managers. The article details the risks: 1) Concentrated exposure to a single collateral type with potential de-pegging or expiry risks. 2) Low immediately withdrawable liquidity (only 5% of the pool's supply), meaning exits may require queuing. 3) No professional oversight for the pool. Key operational advice includes: * Using the number of reputable vaults invested in a pool as a primary filter (for exclusion, not endorsement). * Always calculating the "landed" APY based on one's deposit size and the pool's utilization rate, rather than trusting the listed rate. * Pre-defining strict exit signals (e.g., 2 weeks before collateral expiry, if liquidity falls below a threshold, or if the yield premium narrows). * Acknowledging that the arbitrage window will close as more capital flows into direct pools or product interfaces improve. The analysis concludes that at current low Ethereum gas fees, the cost barrier for this strategy is minimal (~$160 minimum viable position), making risk tolerance—not cost—the deciding factor. The premium represents payment for taking on risks that professional vaults choose to avoid for their conservative products.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

AI OpenAI Solved the Navier-Stokes Problem, Which Mathematicians Could Not Solve for a Quarter Century

On September 8, 2026, OpenAI announced that its AI system had solved the problem of the existence and smoothness of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems set by the Clay Institute in 2000. The problem, unresolved for over a quarter-century, asks whether smooth, initially calm fluid flows can develop a singularity—infinite velocity in finite time—under a smooth external force. OpenAI's system proved that such a singularity can occur, with the total energy of the system remaining finite. This corresponds to two of the possible outcomes outlined by the Clay Institute. The work was performed by an unreleased, advanced model. Starting on September 1, a coordinated group of approximately 10,000 AI agents worked for about 88 hours, exchanging millions of messages and generating roughly 130 billion tokens of text. The solution was formalized in the Lean proof assistant for verification. OpenAI stated it does not intend to claim the $1 million prize. On the same day, mathematicians Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge independently published proofs of finite-time singularities for related fluid equations. They raised questions about whether their work in OpenAI's Codex sessions might have influenced the company's model, but OpenAI denied accessing their specific data, noting the proofs differ in key aspects. The mathematical community will now review both results, a process expected to take months. If validated, it would mark a milestone where a problem of this complexity was solved primarily by a massively parallel AI system.

cryptonews.ruHace 25 min(s)

AI OpenAI Solved the Navier-Stokes Problem, Which Mathematicians Could Not Solve for a Quarter Century

cryptonews.ruHace 25 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片