Tokenized Deposits vs. Stablecoins: The Future of Finance is Not Replacement, but Integration

深潮Published on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

Tokenized deposits and stablecoins represent complementary, not competing, visions for the future of finance. Banks create money through fractional reserve lending, offering low-cost credit to large clients in exchange for deposits—tokenized deposits extend this on-chain but remain within the banking system’s regulatory and operational framework. Stablecoins, like USDC or USDT, function as permissionless, 24/7 cash-like instruments ideal for global settlements, especially in cross-border payments. The future lies in interoperability: corporations may hold tokenized deposits for credit benefits while using stablecoins for efficient, off-ledger transactions. Smart contracts enable complex, multi-party financial workflows beyond what traditional APIs offer. Rather than one replacing the other, both tokenized deposits (for banking-integrated credit) and stablecoins (for borderless liquidity) will coexist on-chain, enabling a more efficient and accessible financial system. The key is building bridges between these models, not choosing sides.

Author: Simon Taylor

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Banks create money; stablecoins move it. We need both.

Proponents of tokenized deposits say: "Stablecoins are unregulated shadow banking. Once banks tokenize deposits, everyone will prefer to use banks."

Some banks and central banks love this narrative.

Proponents of stablecoins say: "Banks are dinosaurs. We don't need them on-chain. Stablecoins are the future of money."

Crypto natives particularly favor this story.

Both sides are missing the point.

Banks Provide Cheaper Credit to Their Largest Clients

You deposit $100, it becomes $90 in loans (or even more). This is how fractional reserve banking works. For centuries, it has been an engine of economic growth.

  • A Fortune 500 company deposits $500 million at JPMorgan Chase.

  • In return, they receive a massive line of credit at below-market interest rates.

  • Deposits are the bank's business model, and large corporations know this.

Tokenized deposits bring this mechanism on-chain, but they only serve the bank's own customers. You are still within the bank's regulatory perimeter, still subject to its business hours, processes, and compliance requirements.

For businesses that need low-cost credit lines, tokenized deposits are a good option.

Stablecoins Are Like Cash

Circle and Tether hold 100% reserves, equivalent to $200 billion in bonds. They earn a 4-5% yield but don't pay you anything.

In return, you get funds free from any bank's regulatory oversight. An estimated $9 trillion will be moved cross-border via stablecoins by 2025. Accessible anytime, anywhere with an internet connection, permissionless, 24/7.

No correspondent bank inquiries, no waiting for SWIFT settlement, no "we'll get back to you in 3-5 business days."

For a company that needs to pay an Argentine supplier at 11 PM on a Saturday, stablecoins are a good option.

The Future is Both

A company that wants a good credit line from a bank might also want to use stablecoins as an on-ramp to long-tail markets.

Imagine this scenario:

  • A Fortune 500 company holds tokenized deposits at JPMorgan Chase

  • In return, it gets a preferential credit line for its US operations

  • It needs to pay an Argentine supplier who prefers stablecoins.

  • So, it swaps JPMD for USDC.

This is an example of where we are headed.

On-chain. Atomic.

Having both.

Using traditional rails where they work.

Using stablecoins where they don't.

It's not an either/or. It's both.

  • Tokenized deposits → Low-cost credit inside the banking system

  • Stablecoins → Cash-like settlement outside the banking system

  • On-chain swaps → Instant conversion, zero settlement risk

Both have pros and cons.

They will coexist.

On-Chain Payments > APIs for Payment Orchestration

Some large banks might say "We don't need tokenized deposits, we have APIs," and in some cases, they are right.

This is precisely the power of on-chain finance.

Smart contracts can build logic across multiple firms and individuals. When a supplier's deposit arrives, a smart contract can automatically trigger inventory financing, working capital financing, FX hedging. Automatically. Instantly. Whether from a bank or a non-bank.

Deposit → Stablecoin → Pay invoice → Downstream payments complete.

APIs are point-to-point. Smart contracts are many-to-many. This makes them ideal for workflows that cross-organizational boundaries. This is the power of on-chain finance.

It's a fundamentally different architecture for financial services.

The Future is On-Chain

Tokenized deposits solve for low-cost credit. Deposits are locked in. Banks lend against them. Their business model remains.

Stablecoins solve for the portability of money. Funds flow permissionless, anywhere. The Global South gets access to dollars. Businesses get fast settlement.

Proponents of tokenized deposits want regulated payment rails only.

Proponents of stablecoins want to replace banks.

The future needs both.

Fortune 500s want massive credit lines from banks AND instant global settlement. Emerging markets want local credit creation AND dollar on-ramps. DeFi wants composability AND real-world asset backing.

Arguing about who wins misses what's happening. The future of finance is on-chain. Tokenized deposits and stablecoins are both necessary infrastructure to get there.

Stop arguing about who wins. Start building interoperability.

Composable money.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument of the article regarding tokenized deposits and stablecoins?

AThe article argues that the financial future is not about one replacing the other, but about the fusion and coexistence of both tokenized deposits and stablecoins. Each serves a distinct purpose: tokenized deposits provide low-cost credit within the banking system, while stablecoins offer cash-like, permissionless settlement outside it.

QAccording to the article, what primary benefit do tokenized deposits offer to large corporate clients?

ATokenized deposits offer large corporate clients access to substantial, low-cost credit lines from their banks, as the deposits form the basis of the bank's lending business model.

QWhat key advantage do stablecoins provide for cross-border payments as highlighted in the text?

AStablecoins provide a permissionless, 24/7, and fast settlement method for cross-border payments, enabling transactions like sending money to an international supplier at any time without relying on traditional banking hours or intermediaries like SWIFT.

QHow does the article describe the role of smart contracts in the future of on-chain finance?

AThe article states that smart contracts enable multi-party logic and automation across organizational boundaries. They can automatically trigger actions like inventory financing, working capital loans, and FX hedging upon payment's receipt, making them more powerful than point-to-point APIs for complex financial workflows.

QWhat is the final call to action for the industry presented in the conclusion?

AThe final call to action is to stop arguing about which will win—tokenized deposits or stablecoins—and instead start building interoperability to create a future of composable money on-chain.

Related Reads

Mars Morning Post | After Fed Rate Cut, US Dollar Records Worst Single-Day Performance Since September; Trump: Rate Cut Too Small, Could Have Been Doubled

Mars News, Dec 11 — Following the Fed’s decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points, the US dollar recorded its worst single-day performance since September, with the dollar index falling 0.4%. Fed Chair Powell emphasized labor market risks and downplayed inflation concerns, contributing to the decline. President Trump criticized the move, calling the cut “too small” and suggesting it should have been doubled. In other developments, Stripe acquired the team behind crypto wallet Valora to expand its stablecoin services. The CFTC launched an innovation council with members including Polymarket, Kraken, and Gemini. GameStop reported a $9.4 million decrease in its Bitcoin holdings in Q3. Elon Musk hinted at a potential SpaceX IPO, while Michael Saylor argued that limiting passive Bitcoin investment would be counterproductive. A new wallet accumulated 1,200 BTC, and the crypto fear and greed index rose to 29, a one-month high. Meanwhile, the Norwegian central bank announced it sees no current need for a CBDC, citing an already efficient payment system. Paxful agreed to plead guilty to U.S. charges and will pay $7.5 million in fines. a16z Crypto opened its first office in Seoul. Analysts noted the Fed’s dovish tone, projecting 100 basis points in rate cuts next year, though internal divisions remain. Powell stated that further rate hikes are not the base case, and the focus is on whether to hold or cut rates.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Mars Morning Post | After Fed Rate Cut, US Dollar Records Worst Single-Day Performance Since September; Trump: Rate Cut Too Small, Could Have Been Doubled

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

A Brief History of the Encrypted Future: Seven Major Trends Reshaping the Industry Narrative in 2026

"Crypto Future: 7 Trends Reshaping the Industry Narrative in 2026" This article outlines seven key trends expected to define the crypto industry in 2026. First, **Appchains** will see a major breakthrough, as applications built on custom, purpose-specific blockchains optimized for unique user experiences and cultures will flourish, enabled by modular infrastructure. Second, **prediction markets** will continue to innovate, with success hinging on solutions that reduce spreads, increase open interest, and capture specific categories of volume. Third, **Agentic Curators** will emerge, using AI agents (LLMs with tools) to manage DeFi risk and strategies through reasoning, not just fixed algorithms, competing directly with human managers. Fourth, **short-form video** will become the dominant traffic and commerce gateway, with platforms blurring the lines between content and payment. Crypto is essential for enabling microtransactions and tracking complex revenue sharing. Fifth, **new AI Scaling Laws** will be driven by blockchain, as decentralized training and inference networks move from testing to production, offering verifiable, confidential computation and challenging centralized AI development. Sixth, **RWA (Real World Assets)** will achieve real-world adoption at scale. Tokenization will expand beyond stablecoins to assets like commodities, credit, and equities, upgrading global capital markets through on-chain transparency and DeFi composability. Finally, an **Agent-driven product renaissance** will begin, shifting the internet's core from apps we use to agents we converse with. These AI agents will manage complex on-chain tasks, filter information, and execute strategies, reducing friction and unlocking a new era of user empowerment.

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

A Brief History of the Encrypted Future: Seven Major Trends Reshaping the Industry Narrative in 2026

Odaily星球日报Hace 9 min(s)

Shorting the Dip, Buying the Rally? FOMC Outcome Reveals the Truth Behind Bitcoin (BTC) Price Trends

Based on historical data from 2025, Bitcoin's (BTC) price action around FOMC meetings reveals a distinct pattern: the market often prices in macroeconomic expectations in advance, leading to a "buy the rumor, sell the news" dynamic. Despite the actual policy decisions, BTC typically experiences selling pressure post-announcement, even during rate-cut cycles. Key findings show that BTC declined after most FOMC events in 2025, with the sharpest seven-day drops (-6.9% and -8%) occurring after the two 25-basis-point rate cuts in September and October. In contrast, meetings with unchanged rates resulted in mixed performance, ranging from +6.92% to -4.58%. This counterintuitive reaction is attributed to structural market dynamics rather than macroeconomic fundamentals. Before FOMC meetings, especially in July, September, and October, significant capital inflows and leveraged long positions were observed, leading to reduced spot liquidity. This over-leveraging often meant that any "hawkish" momentum was already priced in, leaving the market vulnerable to a sell-off once the actual decision was announced. Analysts note that FOMC events act more as market reset points than directional catalysts. When policy outcomes are highly anticipated, pre-meeting volatility compresses, and post-announcement volatility expands, creating predictable short-term dislocations. The data suggests that traders should prepare for heightened volatility, with potential retests of key support levels, such as $88,000, following the typical post-FOMC decline.

cointelegraph_中文Hace 28 min(s)

Shorting the Dip, Buying the Rally? FOMC Outcome Reveals the Truth Behind Bitcoin (BTC) Price Trends

cointelegraph_中文Hace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片