Meta on Trial in the U.S.: 29 States Accuse Company of Harming Children

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-20Actualizado a 2026-08-20

Resumen

On August 18, 2026, a trial against Meta began in a federal court in Oakland, California. A coalition of 29 states, led by California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey, accuses the company of intentionally designing addictive features for Facebook and Instagram, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting data from children under 13 without parental consent. The lawsuit alleges violations of the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws. State prosecutors argue Meta exploited young users for profit, causing them physical and mental harm. Meta denies the allegations, stating a long-term commitment to youth safety and contesting direct links between social media use and declining teen well-being. The plaintiffs seek financial compensation and injunctions to force Meta to remove features like infinite scroll and visible likes, implement time limits for minors, and delete data of under-13 users. The bench trial, presided over by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, is expected to last 6–8 weeks. Testimony from former and current employees, including former staffer Arturo Béjar, has begun. The outcome could set a significant precedent for regulating how tech companies interact with minors and handle their data, potentially influencing future lawsuits against other platforms. The case reflects a broader regulatory shift, examining how algorithms and AI systems shape child behavior, not just platform content.

On August 18, 2026, hearings began in the Oakland court (Northern District of California) in the case against Meta* — the extremist company is accused of intentionally designing features of Facebook and Instagram that encouraged teenagers and children to overuse the platforms, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting personal data from children under 13 without parental consent. The lawsuit was filed by a coalition of 29 states, with California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey acting as lead plaintiffs. According to the plaintiffs, Meta's actions violate the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws.

Positions of the Parties

California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated on August 17: "Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to keep children on the platforms as long as possible — to the point of causing physical and mental harm. Exploiting the most vulnerable users for corporate profit is not only immoral but illegal." Similar statements were made by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman, and New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport.

In court filings, Meta indicated that the plaintiffs' calculations could theoretically lead to penalties of up to $1.4 trillion. Bonta clarified on August 18 that the states are not demanding this exact sum: "To be clear: we are not seeking $1.4 trillion." According to him, this is a maximum theoretical estimate based on the number of young platform users, and the actual amount of fines will be determined by the court.

Plaintiffs' Demands

In addition to compensation, the plaintiffs are seeking court injunctions, including:

  • removal of features that encourage prolonged platform use — such as infinite scroll, visible 'likes,' and recommendation algorithms;

  • implementation of usage time limits for minors;

  • deletion of data belonging to children under 13.

Meta's Position

The company denies the allegations. Meta states that the evidence will show its long-term commitment to supporting young users, and that research does not confirm a direct link between social media use and a decline in teen well-being.

Course of the Proceedings

The case is being presided over by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; the jury plays an advisory role, with the final decision resting with the judge. The trial is scheduled to last 6–8 weeks. Former company employee Arturo Béjar has already testified, speaking about Meta's internal culture and research on harm to teenagers. Testimony from Instagram head Adam Mosseri and other current and former company employees is expected; the question of calling Mark Zuckerberg to testify remains open.

The Oakland trial has become one of the largest proceedings against Meta concerning child protection on social media. The outcome will influence how technology companies structure their engagement with underage users and handle their data.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers' decision could set a precedent for similar lawsuits against other platforms, as COPPA and state consumer protection laws remain key tools for regulating the collection of children's data.

AI Opinion

Analysis shows that the case against Meta fits into a broader wave of legal claims against technology companies for their impact on minors' mental health. Concurrently with the Oakland proceedings, OpenAI recently released a separate version of ChatGPT for teenagers amidst lawsuits where plaintiffs link the deaths of minors to a lack of protective mechanisms in chatbots. This coincidence suggests that regulatory pressure is shifting from the question of "what social networks publish" to "how algorithms and AI systems shape a child's behavior" — the COPPA law, enacted in 1998 for static web pages, is being tested against generative and recommendation systems of a completely different scale.

The financial aspect of the case rarely makes headlines: even partial satisfaction of the claims could change the architecture of recommendation feeds not only at Meta but also at its competitors, who follow its product decisions. Will the liability of technology companies remain limited to social networks, or will the next wave of lawsuits target AI assistants and gaming platforms?

*Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, is recognized as an extremist organization and is banned in Russia.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main accusations brought by the coalition of 29 US states against Meta in the lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit accuses Meta of intentionally designing features for Facebook and Instagram that encouraged excessive use by teens and children, concealing known risks to minors' mental health, and collecting personal data from children under 13 without parental consent. These actions allegedly violate the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and state consumer protection laws.

QWhat are the key injunctive relief demands that the coalition of states is seeking from the court?

AThe states are seeking court orders to require Meta to: 1) Remove features that encourage prolonged platform use, such as infinite scroll, visible 'likes,' and recommendation algorithms. 2) Introduce time usage limits for minors. 3) Delete data belonging to children under the age of 13.

QHow does Meta respond to the accusations in the lawsuit?

AMeta denies the allegations. The company states that the evidence will demonstrate its long-term commitment to supporting young users and claims that research does not confirm a direct link between social media use and a decline in adolescent well-being.

QWhat is the broader regulatory trend suggested by the analysis of this case against Meta?

AThe analysis suggests regulatory pressure is shifting from focusing on 'what social media companies publish' to 'how algorithms and AI systems shape children's behavior.' It questions whether laws like COPPA, enacted in 1998 for static web pages, are sufficient to regulate generative and recommender systems of a completely different scale.

QWhat potential industry-wide impact could the outcome of this trial have, according to the article's analysis?

AEven partial fulfillment of the lawsuit's demands could change the architecture of recommender feeds not only for Meta but also for its competitors, who often follow its product decisions. The analysis also questions if the next wave of lawsuits will extend beyond social media to target AI assistants and gaming platforms.

Lecturas Relacionadas

MSX US Stock Daily Observation: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings: AI Cloud Revenue Growth Hits Record High, AI Cloud Achieves Profitable Closed Loop

**MSX Daily US Stock Watch: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings – AI Cloud Revenue Hits Record Growth, Achieves Profitability Milestone** Alibaba's Q1 FY2027 revenue slightly exceeded expectations at 268.9B yuan (+9% YoY). However, adjusted net profit of 20.7B yuan (-38% YoY) and adjusted EPS missed consensus significantly. This shortfall was primarily driven by increased AI investments and two one-time items: a 5.5B euro provision for an EU Digital Services Act fine and 4.46B yuan in goodwill impairment. The restructured business segments showed clear divergence. The standout performer was the AI Cloud & Computing Services unit, with revenue surging 45% YoY to 48.44B yuan. Crucially, its adjusted EBITA jumped 133% YoY to 5.63B yuan, with margins expanding to 12%, signaling a profitable commercial loop for AI infrastructure. Within the Commerce Group, revenue growth was mixed: China Local Services (instant retail) grew 45% to 53.3B yuan, largely offsetting an 8% decline in Traditional China Commerce (110.9B yuan). International commerce revenue fell 1%. Despite this, the Commerce Group's adjusted EBITA dipped only 1% YoY to 39.75B yuan. A key area to watch is cash flow. Capital expenditures soared 75% YoY to 67.68B yuan, turning free cash flow to a net outflow of 44.67B yuan. However, operating cash flow remained positive and grew 11% YoY to 22.95B yuan, indicating the cash burn is a strategic choice for AI capacity build-out rather than operational weakness. In summary, while headline profits were pressured by heavy AI spending and one-off charges, the core takeaway is the emerging profitability of the AI Cloud business. The success of Alibaba's current investment cycle hinges on whether the profit improvement in AI Cloud can outpace the depreciation costs of its massive computing infrastructure expansion.

Odaily星球日报Hace 22 min(s)

MSX US Stock Daily Observation: Alibaba FY2027 Q1 Earnings: AI Cloud Revenue Growth Hits Record High, AI Cloud Achieves Profitable Closed Loop

Odaily星球日报Hace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片