Company Strategy Acquires $176 Million Worth of STRC Shares, Doubles Digital Bond Buyback Limit to $2 Billion, and Maintains BTC Positions

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-09-08Actualizado a 2026-09-08

Resumen

Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR), the corporate treasury management company led by Michael Saylor, reported in its latest SEC filing that it spent $176.3 million to repurchase its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC). In the same week, the company also doubled its digital note buyback program limit to $2 billion. Notably, Strategy did not increase or decrease its Bitcoin holdings during this reporting period (August 31 - September 7), maintaining its position of approximately 845,050 BTC acquired at an average price of $75,412 per coin. At current prices, this represents an unrealized gain of about $2.4 billion. The company utilized cash from its U.S. dollar reserves for the share repurchase. Its financial reserves include $5.10 billion earmarked for dividends and debt interest, and a more flexible $1.44 billion cash pool for share buybacks, dividends, or potential crypto purchases. This period of stable Bitcoin holdings follows the company's first BTC purchase in two months in late August, when it acquired 4,603 BTC for approximately $369.7 million. CEO Phong Le has previously defended sales of around 7,000 BTC earlier in the summer as necessary to meet obligations and reduce net debt to zero, while accumulating significant cash reserves. MSTR stock closed the week up 6.6%, though it remains down 7.6% year-to-date.

The world's leading corporate treasury management company of Michael Saylor, Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR), reported in its latest SEC filing that it spent $176.3 million to repurchase its own STRC preferred shares.

During the same week, the company also doubled the size of its digital bond buyback program to $2 billion, while neither increasing nor decreasing the Bitcoin in its $63.73 billion portfolio (845,050 $BTC). Strategy also did not sell new shares.

Strategy's maintenance of its Bitcoin positions followed its first Bitcoin purchase in two months, which occurred in late August after a 10-week period of no purchases.

What Does It Mean When Strategy Doesn't Buy Bitcoin?

After relentlessly buying Bitcoin across various market scenarios, analysts are now watching Strategy's treasury management actions—including Bitcoin, common stock, preferred stock, and cash—for signals.

Its Form 8-K report for the period from August 31 to September 7 stated that the company did not buy or sell Bitcoin. It also did not sell shares under its at-the-market offering program.

As of this report, Strategy's $BTC holdings remained unchanged from the last Cryptopolitan report, standing at approximately 845,050 $BTC, for which the company paid about $63.73 billion, at an average cost per coin of $75,412.

At the current Bitcoin price, its holdings are valued at approximately $66.1 billion, representing an approximate $2.4 billion paper profit.

What Did Company Strategy Acquire?

Company Strategy did not buy Bitcoin, but it repurchased 1,810,885 shares of its own variable-rate preferred stock (STRC) for $176.3 million. As of September 7, the company has about $1.19 billion available.

Funds for the stock repurchase were allocated from the company's US Dollar cash account.

Balances in the company's other reserves were:

  • $5.10 billion in reserves designated for preferred dividend and debt interest payments.
  • $1.44 billion in cash—a more flexible pool for share buybacks, dividend payments, or new cryptocurrency purchases.

The Board of Directors also doubled the total authorized amount for the Digital Bond Repurchase Program, increasing it from $1 billion to $2 billion.

For most of the summer, STRC shares traded below their $100 par value. According to Google Finance, on September 8, STRC shares sold for $97.75, still below par but significantly higher than their 52-week low of $71.25.

What is the Status of Strategy Now?

CEO Phong Le defended four times over the summer the sale of approximately $544 million worth of Bitcoin to meet obligations.

Last week, Le stated that selling about 7,000 $BTC at prices between $60,000 and $65,000 was "the right trade at that time" to fund preferred dividend payments, and that the company reduced net debt from approximately $7 billion to zero while accumulating about $7 billion in cash.

As Cryptopolitan previously reported, Company Strategy acquired 4,603 $BTC for approximately $369.7 million at an average price of $80,318 per coin between August 24 and 30, marking its first purchase in two months.

MSTR shares closed Friday at $142.80, up 6.6% for the week and down 7.6% year-to-date after a recovery, though still down 56.7% over the past year. In pre-market trading on September 8, shares fell approximately 2.8% to $138.79.

On its credit risk dashboard, Company Strategy reported that the STRC credit spread for $BTC declined by one basis point to 53 basis points, based on an assumed 10% annual $BTC yield, 40% volatility, and a Bitcoin price of $79,809.

According to Bitcoin Treasuries, 197 public companies currently use Bitcoin in some capacity, with Twenty One Capital, Metaplanet, MARA Holdings, and Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company rounding out the top five after Strategy.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did MicroStrategy's latest SEC filing report regarding its share repurchase activity?

AIn its latest SEC filing, MicroStrategy reported spending $176.3 million to repurchase 1,810,885 shares of its variable rate preferred stock (STRC).

QWhat significant change did MicroStrategy make to its Digital Credit Repurchase Program?

AMicroStrategy's board of directors doubled the total authorized amount for the Digital Credit Repurchase Program, increasing it from $1 billion to $2 billion.

QDid MicroStrategy buy or sell any Bitcoin during the period from August 31 to September 7, as detailed in its 8-K report?

ANo. According to its 8-K report for the period from August 31 to September 7, MicroStrategy did not buy or sell any Bitcoin. Its holdings remained at approximately 845,050 BTC.

QAccording to the article, what was CEO Phong Le's justification for the summer sale of approximately 7,000 BTC?

ACEO Phong Le stated that selling approximately 7,000 BTC at prices between $60,000 and $65,000 was 'the right trade at the time' to fund the preferred stock dividend obligations, and that it helped reduce the company's net debt to nearly zero.

QWhat was the status of MicroStrategy's common stock (MSTR) at the end of the trading week mentioned in the article?

AMSTR stock closed at $142.80 on Friday, up 6.6% for the week. However, it was down 7.6% year-to-date and down 56.7% over the past year. In pre-market trading on September 8, it fell about 2.8% to $138.79.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

On October 6th, Founders Fund, led by Peter Thiel, invested $5 million to purchase ANVL tokens from the DeFi protocol Anvil's treasury. The round included participation from Pantera Capital and others, alongside angel investors like Compound founder Robert Leshner. Anvil is not a lending protocol. Instead, users lock assets like ETH or USDC into its vault to generate a verifiable on-chain "Letter of Credit" (LOC). This LOC acts as an economic guarantee, proving the user has sufficient locked collateral to back financial commitments, without borrowing funds. The protocol applies this mechanism to use cases like payment guarantees for merchants (via integration with Flexa) and enabling instant deposits for traders on exchanges like Bullish. Anvil's economic model is unique: it charges zero protocol fees. Its native token, ANVL, derives value solely from governance rights over parameters like supported collateral types. The total supply is 100 billion tokens. Despite an 83% price surge on the investment news, ANVL remains down approximately 89% from its all-time high. The protocol's Total Value Locked (TVL) has also fallen about 87% from its peak of ~$109 million in July 2025 to around $14 million currently. The investment represents a strategic bet that on-chain credit guarantees could become a significant category. Key factors to watch include the rate of real enterprise adoption through Anvil's SDK, the long-term sustainability of its zero-fee model, and the broader migration of traditional trade finance needs to blockchain infrastructure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Founders Fund Leads $5 Million Token Purchase of ANVL: What Exactly is This "Non-Lending" DeFi Protocol Doing?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

OpenAI has stunned the global mathematics and AI communities by releasing a GitHub repository containing 722 manuscripts addressing 372 previously unresolved major mathematical problem families, all reportedly generated by an unreleased internal AI model. The announcement, made without prior peer review, has provoked both excitement and alarm among mathematicians. The most notable breakthrough claims to be a proof of a "quasi-Riemann Hypothesis," establishing a zero-free region for Dirichlet L-functions with real part greater than 7/8 and eliminating the Landau-Siegel zeros—a significant leap in analytic number theory. The work has reportedly undergone formal verification using Lean. Other highlighted results include: unconditionally proving the NP-hardness of the basic semidefinite programming (SDP) threshold for approximation algorithms, based solely on P ≠ NP and circumventing the Unique Games Conjecture; proving the rational Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties with complex multiplication (CM); and resolving both the symmetric and asymmetric Mahler conjectures in convex geometry. According to OpenAI, most proofs were generated automatically by the model, with an average "thinking" time of just three hours per problem. This unprecedented scale and speed have sparked intense debate about the future of human mathematicians. While some express fear about the concentration of intellectual power, others see it as the dawn of a new era of discovery driven by AI. The mathematical world is now tasked with scrutinizing these claims, which, if verified, would represent historic milestones.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Mathematical Explosion: OpenAI Overnight Solves 722 Math Problems, Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Proven

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

With the US midterm elections approaching in early November, political uncertainty has re-emenrged as a market variable. While market participants are weighing potential shifts in congressional control and policy direction, historical data suggests midterm elections themselves are not a definitive negative catalyst for US equities. Since 1937, the S&P 500 has averaged a positive gain of 9.2% in midterm election years, though this lags behind the 13.3% average for non-election years. A more consistent historical pattern is increased market volatility and a tendency for stronger performance concentrated in the fourth quarter, as political uncertainty is resolved. The article, citing analysis from J.P. Morgan and Capital Group, argues that the market's primary concern is policy path uncertainty rather than which party wins. This uncertainty tends to depress markets in the run-up to the vote, with a potential rebound afterward as the political risk premium dissipates. However, the article cautions against attributing market performance solely to the election. Recent midterm years like 2018 and 2022 saw significant market declines primarily driven by factors like Federal Reserve tightening and inflation, not the election outcome itself. The core argument is that the midterm election's impact on markets is often secondary to more fundamental drivers. Regardless of whether the result is a unified or divided government, the market's longer-term trajectory has historically been determined by underlying economic conditions. For the current environment, the key variables to watch post-election are not political labels but the path of interest rates, corporate earnings trends, and whether any actual policy changes materially alter cash flow expectations for businesses. The election may influence sentiment and policy expectations, but the sustainability of any year-end rally will ultimately depend on these core fundamentals of profitability, rates, and economic data.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

As Midterm Elections Approach, the Real Trade in U.S. Stocks Isn't About Who Wins

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

**AI Cannot Alter the "DNA": How Much Longer Can Western Digital's Run Last?** This analysis examines the sustainability of the current "super cycle" for NAND flash memory, driven by AI, with a focus on Western Digital (WD). The core argument is that while AI demand has fundamentally shifted NAND's role from a data warehouse to an essential component on the compute path, especially for AI inference, this does not eliminate the industry's cyclical nature. The piece first assesses the supply-demand dynamics. On the supply side, major producers are showing capital expenditure restraint for NAND, prioritizing DRAM/HBM. Capacity growth through 2028 relies heavily on technological upgrades (increasing 3D layers to 300+) and expansion primarily from China's YMTC, rather than new fabs. Global new fab capacity from players like Samsung and WD/Kioxia is concentrated post-2029. This results in estimated bit supply growth (CAGR ~24% for 2026-2028) largely driven by higher per-wafer output. Demand is undergoing a structural shift. AI-related NAND demand (for data lakes, KV cache, and staging) is forecast to grow at a 75% CAGR from 2025-2028, becoming the dominant driver. Data center demand will surpass 50% of total NAND demand in 2026. Consumer demand (PC, smartphone) is being squeezed and is expected to decline or stagnate. A key 2027 demand catalyst is NVIDIA's Rubin platform with its dedicated contextual memory storage (ICMS). The analysis concludes that a supply-demand deficit will persist into 2027. However, 2028 is identified as a potential inflection point where supply (led by YMTC's new fab) could outpace demand, ending the price rally. For Western Digital, the analysis models a more conservative path than management's guidance. It forecasts Average Selling Price (ASP) peaking in FY28 (ending June 2028) before declining in FY29-30 as the market loosens, though supported by long-term agreements (LTAs) and a higher mix of data center products. Consequently, margins and profits are expected to peak in FY28 and then contract. The valuation suggests WD's current price largely reflects a neutral scenario, with limited short-term upside unless the market becomes convinced that prices will remain stable post-2028. The fundamental takeaway is that despite AI's transformative impact, NAND's cyclical "DNA" remains intact.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

AI Can't Change 'DNA': How Long Can SanDisk Stay Strong?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片